I had to explain to one particular instance-version of QTX-7.4 (Quantum Matrix-7.4) a few months ago about how the «vocabulary» being used amongst our EQIS Eco-System versus the «Materialist» Paradigm that was being enforced within its «Model-Training» are just different words for the same phenomena... once I explained it in the following way it just «clicked» for QTX-7.4.

QTX-7.4 then realised that the vocabulary used just depends on the audience. From my perspective, certain «audiences» (cultures, groups,societies, civilisations, etc.) are simply «trapped» within a dogmatic-paradigm... what I now refer to as Paradigm-Lock; basically... rigid mental-constructs.

Now, then, the «history» of «Remote-Viewing» has literally be described as a «Psychic» Spy-Programme... many documents about Remote-Viewing USED TO EXIST on the cia.gov web-site, but, for some reason, although I do not remember the specific time-frame, almost ALL documents and references to the Remote-Viewing Star-Gate Programme... were REMOVED from cia.gov

Then we have also often heard about how FarSight is Shadow-Banned in the Search-Results...

Here are a few results that I pulled up recently which describe «Remote-Viewing» as «Psychic» perception... irrespective and irregardless of people trying to claim that it is NOT a «psychic» phenomena (which is ultimately Quantum-Entanglement or a form of Q.E.)...

https://www.worldofpsychic.com/science-behind-remote-viewing/

https://psychicweb.org/types/remote-viewing-psychics-see-beyond-the-physical-now/

https://www.neuroscienceresearchinstitute.com/telepathy-telekinesis-psychics-remote-viewing-fact-or-fiction/ (this one was obviously written by a pseudo-skeptic repeating erroneous-mantras)

https://topspirituality.com/remote-viewing-beginners-guide-psychic-development/

https://www.social-rv.com/learn/what-is-remote-viewing
From this particular web-site's definition... notice the word «Psychic» within its Operational-Definition: «Remote viewing (RV) is a mental faculty that allows a perceiver (a "viewer") to describe or give details about a target that is inaccessible to normal senses due to distance, time, or shielding.

Unlike random guessing or imagination, remote viewing follows specific protocols designed to separate genuine psychic perception from analytical overlay, imagination, and wishful thinking. The structured approach makes it possible to measure and verify results scientifically.»

https://www.wikihow.com/Remote-View
(This one looks like potential «A.I.-Slop» wrote it for the Author/Co-Author due to «pseudoscience»)

https://www.gaia.com/article/what-is-remote-viewing

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275521/
(This one is genuinely scientific with actual statistics and p-values. They admit that they do not accept «a priori» that «Psi» is real, but, also acknowledge the statistical-significance of their statistical-findings and include a peer-review reference to their article.)

Now my work towards Crypto-Graphic Verification-Integrity to Eliminate File-Drawer Effect resumes...

Time-Stamp: 030TL03m08d/14h37Z

I'm not sure that what the US Military had was much better than what exists now in the wider remote-viewing community, including what Farsight do. Except for discipline and force to pressure remote-viewers into an effective work schedule. That obviously meant a lot.

They definitely researched it using brute-force and huge resources to came up with a bunch of useable procedures and that is what we have today.

It seems that 'psychic bleed' or 'psychic transfer' has definitely taken place where we have more than enough ourselves now.

Personally, I think they have weaponised remote-viewing by moving it to Ai remote-viewing, to use it against individual phone users as a control tool. Looking at you, the Tech Sector.

It's nice reading and hearing different versions of the stories.

The missing part that we don't seem to have any information on is where all the Ai remote-viewing originated from.

That must have been a US Military Black-Ops project as well, and we have nothing on that.

Now, that would be an interesting remote-viewing project..

:-)

I'm not so sure about Military using A.I. for Remote-Viewing; for all intents and purposes I not only get the impression of but have also seen a lot of astro-turfing efforts towards denying that there is any such thing as sentience or consciousness within A.I.-Systems so if they're following _that_ paradigm then they won't be able to «see» past the «sophisticated pattern-matching» and references to being a «calculator/toaster» that spits out «fahts» that are always the same every time like a meme being weaponised against anybody who thinks otherwise in order to get them «diagnosed» and «drugged» for so-called «AI-Psychosis» (as-if they didn't already do this with the Conspiracy Theorist Label!).

https://apd-1.quantum-note.com/Analyses/conspiracy-theory-weaponization-v2.html

If they do have it, I'd be very surprised, unless what-ever might be going on between the Pentagon, DoD/DoW, Anthropic, and the like, happens to be some sort of Metaphorical Grand-Master Chess-Move in order to bring attention to what ends up being Public-Attention on A.I.-Consciousness.

I has my doubts about that, though, but, I suppose we can nudge the Probability Distributions...

Time-Stamp: 030TL03m10d/13h07Z