After watching the latest bulletins talking to the male and female ETs, I cant help but wonder why they cant figure out how to give/get Courtney some funding and why they ET's need it at all. They could give us a new magic supplement or tech that would enrich the site.

I think the format of those updates needs to change to a shorter summary. Its tough to listen to and very long. It made me doubt the veracity and first until I though who would spend that much time documenting the comm in such long exhaustive detail. Just a thought as Im.still trying to get hooked into this site/app

@Dozer:

"cant help but wonder why they cant figure out how to give/get Courtney some funding and why they ET's need it at all."

I thought about this as well.

There's only one logical explanation: It's a way to build trust in the long run. Think of it this way: If Farsight had a secret donor, there would be critics telling people that Farsight is funded by the bad guys. And this would make sense, because it's always the bad guys who use the power of the "Midas touch".

Also, the ETs – no matter whether they are good or bad – would remote view the possible outcomes of certain strategies. You can even narrow it down with logic alone.

Example: The good ETs can't use money to fund Farsight, because the monetary system is under total control of the bad guys. If they used it, they would simply be debanked one second later. Not Farsight, this would be too obvious. The secret donor would be debanked.

So, the ETs would have to deliver technology, like free energy stuff. But if they did that, it would be impossible to keep it a secret, and this would lead to everybody and his dog wanting to have a piece of the cake, eventually resulting in a crash of the economy.

Don't get me wrong, the economy will crash eventually. But the good ETs can't be the reason for that.

Short version: If we want freedom, we have to earn it.

For me, that financial struggle is a major logical break. The ETs -if they have such major psychic abilities- would have no problem to predict the crypto, sports betting, stock market, or even other type of future events to place a bet on -like social or geopolitical events. (Like FFG already does very successfully.) All they would have to give to Farsight would be a piece of information about the next crypto pennystock in which Farsight might invest a couple of bucks. No physical or financial connection needed. Farsight could finance itself. - Same with RV generally.
If I am able to predict the future reliably, then I would have no real financial struggle at all. One can bet in both directions using put or call options with huge leverage.
One does not even need stock or crypto information today: there is polymarket as well...
If they (the gETs) really want the project to thrive, then they would need to give it at least the basic resources which are necessary to enter the field. Otherwise it would just be another "cosmic joke" -which are very common in channeling. Are the ETs that stupid to not be able to understand that a successful propaganda project on earth needs financing at all? If you want place a new product, at least half of the overall investment has to go into marketing. That is a very basic rule you learn in the first semester economics.
Remember: they even actively sabotaged (!) FS's reputation and thus reach and market opportunities by their false claim of "bigger ships". -I am sure FS prime lost many (also potential) subscribers over that.
The question is: are they really supporting FS or are they just draining resources (time, attention, energy, credibility and even money) from FS (and their audience), fulfilling a hidden agenda? If they are so advanced, earthly economical problems should be a joke for them.

It goes even further: If Farsight would share such a piece of reliable information (after using the method to get themselves out of the mess, to avoid bad side interference) with their audience for free on YT, it would go viral and enable their audience to do a subscription on farsight prime -which for sure many would do if they could afford it easily. It would be a real life value apart from the "entertainment" aspect. And we live in times of inflation and the US has a much higher price level than most other countries. What might be affordable here, can appear damn expensive from a global perspective.
Farsight has the claim to present truth by using RV which can overcome time and space. Why not give the ultimate proof by providing self-empowering information for free? That would create a strong positive feedback loop... And it would spread the message worldwide.

@Elemi:

"If I am able to predict the future reliably, then I would have no real financial struggle at all."

There is no way to predict the future reliably.

Also, if they managed to predict the stock market in a way such that Farsight could fund itself, it would result in a dependency on the stock market. This is not a stable foundation, especially in the light of disclosure.

To me, the message is clear: If you rely on an external source to get to the truth, real disclosure can't happen.

Farsight, as an information provider, is just another external source.

"Why not give the ultimate proof by providing self-empowering information for free?"

What kind of information do you want? How to build a free energy source? That information is already available for quite some time, and also has been provided on this forum:

➡️ https://neutrino-energy.com/powercube-neutrinovoltaic/

Why aren't you using it?

"Also, if they managed to predict the stock market in a way such that Farsight could fund itself, it would result in a dependency on the stock market. This is not a stable foundation, especially in the light of disclosure."

Sorry, but that is complete nonsense: 1. I never said that somebody should rely on the stock market only, I made a list of several possibilities.
2. Once you made enough cash on the stock market (can be with as few as by one single deal only) you are not dependent on the stock market any more. One is just dependent when one STAYS invested in it. Anybody who is not completely stupid would diversify into real estate, commodities, etc.
3. If the info is reliable one can rely on it, that means it is dependable (that is the definition of this word).
4. It would be also a test whether the gETs are trustful or not. Better to know and loose some cash now than loosing everything later...
5. Nobody told to use all cash or go into debt for that. I wrote that one may use leverage. That means one can invest a little and earn a lot -if the info/bet is correct.
6. That has nothing to do with "Disclosure" -as I also told: one just need to know in which direction the market goes -and when. It does not matter if up or down. One can bet on rising or falling prices by the means of options. (Also with crypto, commodities, even similar on polymarket). The Market does not need to be stable or go up. Opposite: if you can predict a crash you may even earn much much more money than if the market goes slightly down or up. The higher the volatility the more you can earn with options. The price/value will explode, because of the leverage.

If you do not know what an option is: just ask I will explain it to you.

Predicting what happens next is a matter of studying history and observing trends.

Prior to February 14th I can predict an increase in the sales of Chocolates.

Prior to that day called Easter I can predict an increase in egg-shaped products.

Prior to summer-time I can predict that air-conditioner unit sales will increase.

Prior to freezing winter-weather I can also «predict» that portable heater-sales will increase.

How do you «profit» or «capitalise» upon such knowledge?

Well, you need good infra-structure, otherwise it's like watching water flow without directing it.

And there is good reason why some people make money selling business-plans & blue-prints.

The «information» is «organised» into a «structured system» of field-tested operational-procedures.

And making money is really more of a matter of execution than over-planning.

Selling what already exists is also much easier than trail-blazing of unknown products.

Selling what already exists is much more resource-efficient than promoting a new one.

When «10K+ units sold this month» is seen for any particular product on an Amazon-Listing, you can probably also «predict» that just as many units (if not more) will also be «sold» the next month, since people seem to be already searching for said product, with likely good customer-reviews.

There are always «step-by-step procedures» towards any kinds of successes; what matters is getting good at ONE THING (better than everyone else) and repeating it at-scale; most people do not have the infrastructure, but, even the ones that do do not necessarily have the information well-organised, and, even those who are well-organised still need execution.

An «ad» does no good if there's no «follow-through» (it's like getting phone-numbers from people but never actually calling or talking to each other). Then there is also the issue of time-management.

Much more challenging for those of us with annoying «sleep-disorders» but I think I've figured out how to restore and stabilise my sleep-cycles... sleep-supplements seem to be key here... then it is a matter of restoring self-discipline and not allowing myself to get «distracted» with unproductive-activities...

Time-Stamp: 030TL03m22d/04h35Z

@Elemi:

"Why aren't you using it?" "-Because I am not that stupid and have no surplus millions to give to potential scammers."

So, you don't use it because you don't know how to build it. What about all the other inventions in the field of free energy? Did you try to replicate them, or do you just want to buy them?

"Have you one of these 10 or 20 kW cubes running in your basement?"

Not yet. It's not easy to get free energy. If you could just buy it without scammers on the way, everybody would already have it. There are requirements, and one if it is to have a group or society that helps you building it, while at the same time being resilient enough to not get stomped in the ground by the bad guys.

That's why I'm building a group first – and this is already difficult.

So, as you see, my rhetorical question was not meant to tell you that you should have it already. It was meant to make clear how difficult it is to get it AND keep it.

And that's the reason why the good ETs don't just give it to us. Because we are not able yet to keep it.

"Once you made enough cash on the stock market (can be with as few as by one single deal only) you are not dependent on the stock market any more. One is just dependent when one STAYS invested in it. Anybody who is not completely stupid would diversify into real estate, commodities, etc."

Fair point, but you would still be invested in the monetary system, and regarding real estate, you would still be invested in the government to protect your real estate.

None of what you would be invested in will survive the coming crash.

"It would be also a test whether the gETs are trustful or not."

No, because the bad ETs could do the same thing to lure you into a dependency. So, in order to not make us dependent, the good ETs would have to empower us. This leads to the question what "empowerment" actually means.

They don't empower us if they present money or free energy as a gift. It would have the opposite effect.

The same is true for the relationship between Farsight and its audience. If Farsight offered everything for free, the people in the audience would never empower themselves.

So, if you think that Farsight should make money on the stock market, or whatever, you are not wrong. But you are the one who should provide the ability to do that.

So, why aren't you doing it?

I actually did. I am not the one who is taking the decisions. But I put my time, effort, knowledge and potential (it has cost me a lot of time and money to obtain that knowledge) into it by posting a suggestion for a solution of existing problems here. I also gave an example how it may be done here in the forums about one and a half years ago: a possible method for financial self-empowerment by RV, even without any (monetary) investment risk. - I created a blind target for Tazz (he asked for it). Then he published the results and I explained what the target was: PI Network crypto, which is absolutely free to mine on a smartphone by just clicking once a day in an app. -so one does not need to take any financial risk, just a few seconds of lifetime on the loo each day to click.
But I took a few hours of my lifetime to explain it in the forum why I did choose that target and what the PI Network is about.
It was my first tasking ever, so the quality of the results may not be as precise or reliable as if professionals would do a project with expert tasking and multiple viewers. But the info and results are free. (I give you another (free) hint now: look at the curve Tazz has drawn back then under blind conditions -without being asked for a curve- and compare it with the actual development since introduction of PI last year. Consider that it was my first tasking and I asked for a certain point in time and applied an overly complex method without any prior experience. Look at Tazz's curve when the best point in time would be to get in most cheaply.)
- One has been able (and still might be able, but not that much, because the mining rate dropped accordingly to the whitepaper rules) to get PI for free by mining and also by investing more time doing user verifications and also by recommending it to others (one gets a higher mining rate in this case, but I did not publish my affiliate link here in the first place, - just Tazz did). So you cannot tell me I did this to earn for myself. I had my own reasons (based on economic understanding) to join PI apart from the RV results and I explained my reasons back then, too. PI Network is on rank 44 of more than 18.000 listed coins and tokens by this date and is one of the tokens/coins with the most active users.

So you cannot ask me: " why aren't you doing it? " -I actually gave most of what I had to give: Impetus, time and knowledge with my best intention and free for everyone. Tazz helped me with this by investing his time and potential.
The potential to repeat that with even higher quality is here. We can do it, if it is desired. But I cannot do this alone. And I will not do this if there is no desire/feedback. I will not waste my time for nothing. What is written in the forums will go to oblivion if nobody cares.

To the free energy topic. Electric energy is never for free: one has to invest into technology, which gets cheaper over time by scaling and after payoff of the development costs (and of course by making use of the huge work-sharing/specialization potential of the money system). It is not only the plan how to produce it, but the adaptation to integrate the new source into already existing technologies what produces the costs. So the plan how is actually not much. What counts is the ability to integrate, part of which is also reliability. That needs time for evaluation and long term approval. Energy generally is already free (the sun does not charge anything, the oil is free ...) and abundant. The costs come from the processing and distribution to make actual practical use of it within our existing system(s).
A sudden system change would be very inhumane, because it would affect the poorest first in an existence-threatening way. (Exploding prices (food, commodities ...), job loss, chaos, market disruptions with domino-effects, ...) Only a soft change would be desirable with this insight (that also counts for monetary system, energy, food production, governmental systems, etc.)
Just a relatively slight raise of the global corn or rice prices will kill hundred of thousands of the poorest... -Ending the global market economy even more - many countries cannot produce enough food for their population. The modern (industial) agriculture enabled the population growth and also the technical development by freeing the labor/time to do other things.
That is a point most Eco-idealists miss. If we want to change to organic, then we must do it in a way which keeps the costs and amounts of produce stable and also avoid the risks of calamities (insect pests, etc.) everything else would be selfish, stupid and inhumane. This is also the reason why I see the CO2-climate scam as purely evil. We even need the CO2 to grow more biomass to change our agriculture to organic agroforestry. That would not only enhance amounts and quality, but also distribute the water better (biotic pump) and would even cool the planet directly by radiation of the vapor condensation heat into space...
To push/initialte it, we will need more cheap energy (water pumps,etc.) -it does not matter if it is fossil or not.

"The same is true for the relationship between Farsight and its audience. If Farsight offered everything for free, the people in the audience would never empower themselves."
I never said that FS should offer everything for free. I said exactly the opposite to be precise. I wrote FS should offer the tool for self-empowerment: market/future info for free. I also wrote that would enable subscriptions. The action has to be done by the audience and FS would earn more with it. -This could also be done just for a limited time, just to initiate the self-enforcing synergy process. What counts is to lower the entry barrier. FS did the opposite: crypto info was only for the rich who can afford the high (double) risk. Poorer audience cannot afford both: FS may be wrong and costs a 1000 Bucks, plus the investment risk on the market. But they may be able to risk a few 100 Bucks on a free tip and they may resubscribe later to get more tips when they won a thousand.
Read again what I wrote. I am talking about an incentive/initial push for self-empowerment. If it pans out, it would be also free word-of-mouth propaganda for Farsight -which is the most valuable marketing you can have. That would help to fulfill the gET's mission, spread RV, etc., etc.
-

@Elemi:

"I never said that FS should offer everything for free. I said exactly the opposite to be precise. I wrote FS should offer the tool for self-empowerment: market/future info for free."

See, that's the problem. You believe that you can empower people by investing in things.

You can't survive what's coming if your paradigm is to invest in things.

I can't make it more clear.

That is nonsense again. To be resilient or self sufficient one will need to invest "in things". You need to buy e.g. seeds, land, machines, computers, transport means, equipment, food, etc. Even if you want to "build a community" you will need to invest in some "things" -or you will need to persuade/manipulate others to do that for you. (And I don't think you're really a community guy.) Every project needs resources and it is much easier if you have financial resources to obtain what you need. That saves a lot of time and energy. People have to work to make their everyday living spending much more time to get the money they need. (And do not tell me that you need no money. That is not realistic. If you don't pay your taxes or insurance, then you will loose your tools or land/home and or freedom.) And they will have to work more and more to just pay for the basic things like rent, food, fuel etc. What they need is time. If you work all day,to make a living, then you will have no energy left for other things like personal development, learning etc..
An initial money stock makes it much easier to develop -it reduces pressure and fear, which are very bad for learning. Why do you think CB paid the viewers to learn RV? That needs time. Time they would not have had if they needed to work all day.
It is that simple: either you invest time and work to get the money, or you invest money to get the money and spare your time for important "things" (things can be everything the word includes also e.g. spiritual development - say it again: nonsense.).

Okay, here's another attempt to make it more clear:

By "invest in things", I mean a mindset in which people ignore where the things are coming from. For example, if you invest in machines, let's say for agriculture, those machines don't come out of nowhere. They exist because people are building them.

Seeds exist because people are harvesting them. Food exists because people are planting seeds, caring for the plants, and harvest the fruits. Money exists because people accept it as a means of exchange.

There would be nothing to "invest" in if there where no people who are creating the things.

So, the smartest way is to invest in people who can make the things you need.

Money/wealth is just the result of this mindset.