You have 3 primary domains where values and mechanisms of those values exist or shift between.

When I say values I mean things that are described with one word, even complex words, they are generally immeasurable but outcome focused. Charity, love, ascension, justice ... there are hundreds of words in the English language that fits "values" by tgis standard.

But you also have value mechanisms. Things that seem very ideal to a set of values which lives strongly bot only in publications but in people's minds. Things like the bill of rights, the ten commandments, the 8-fold path.

Many of the mechanisms of value systems survive by institution, but institution by itself is not enough. The institutions are only successful if these systems survive by traditions.

Once in a while a mechanism like this arises by mere personal conception. A select group of people publish or take action with an articulable novel principle, and it becomes tradition.

Enter earth. The traditions of values is the fulcrum, and the driver of that fulcrum has been institutions. These institutions, of course, are enslaver designed. The enslavers know that the control cannot be 100% institutional drive. The people manifest traditions, perhaps psionically, in recognition that they were individually developed. They trust traditions based on its creation by benevolent individuals. Buddha, Jesus, Mohammad. These originators were not necessarily nefarious. Their ideas were simply co-opted institutionally.

Ok all of this information is useless for you if you can't apply it.

Tradition, like it or not, is the fulcrum.

Individual traditions get broken all the time. But traditions as an entity are the best survivors on the planet. They survive individual lives, they often survive genocides, they survive revolutions.

The farsight ethos encourages us to abandon institutions. But we're not being encouraged, nor would I realistically encourage, to try abandon traditions. It doesn't matter if you like them or dislike them. The point is they survive better than you do. Even if the ideal thing to do is to break a tradition, you're challenging a battle that is probably not worth fighting. Institutions, on the other hand, are more fragile. They don't just need belief, they need continuous material resources.

There is a way to break institutions while not trying to kill traditions. It's in the traditions where the cognitive dissonance lies. The space where people you had hoped would be your allies will become your enemy.

Go with the grain, take the path of least resistance.

So what are mechanisms of tradition? You're not gonna like it.

The king james bible. The quran. The Vedas. The tao te ching. It's also the constitution, the bill of rights. And today we might also include the book of urantia, the alien interview, the toltec 4 agreements, aesop's fables, Plato's republic.

Traditions are often based on a cherished book or a sacred text, but they can also often be based on a section, a talisman, even just geometry.

My main point is that you're not going to turn the world around attacking traditions. That's like trying to turn a car around when you can actually access the steering wheel.

Let institutions burn, violently if it has to be. Allow traditions to survive. Because they have a life of their own, a will to survive. And as much as it's true: institutions will violently oppose you when you try to destroy them. Well they are a walk in the park compared to traditions.

This, to me, is the path. Keep your traditions. But we, the galactic federation, are here to destroy your institutions.

There simply are not any "true" deities. Never have been.

There may not be, at least as we depict them, but fighting those that believe in them is an uphill battle

This comment probably will not go down well because remote-viewers seem to be convinced that "they invented remote-viewing", when actually "remote-viewing" is a tradition called "Mysticism".

Yes, the US Military did refine it to the point where it become a 'procedure' that was written down in a document.

However, it was weaponised. And the procedure "leaked:.

The actual "tradition of Mysticism" goes back in Judaism thousands of years and is embedded in the Torah, which is what Christians call the bible.

Let's just say that over the millennia Chrisitans as well as the Jewish Tradition has tried to keep Mysticism alive. In addition, although I know litte about it Islam also has a tradition of Mysticism especially in Turkey where It's demonstrated.

Judaism also has its own ideas about Deities, which don't align with what is taught in Christianity or Islam. But probably do align with traditional "Indigenous cultures".

There (in Judaism) the ideology says that on Earth, there exist certain places where the 'veil of reality' get thin. Or, in other words, places where one can access the divine get stronger.

What even are deities?

Here is where most people only define "bad ET's: (as defined by Farsight) as 'Deities'. This is incorrect and the tradition of Judaism doesn't agree. So whilst 'worship' of deities might be forbidden, connecting for information is not. That is a "Bad ET rule" in Farsight terminology - ie an institutional rule of the Bad ETs.

A deity in Judasim can be a crystalline mountain or valley, where connection to the Source or 'G-d' is thin.

This is what Jerusalem really has. An energetic connection point to "G-d". It's even undeniable for the "Christian tradition", for those that align to the Yeshua/Jesus 'tradition'.

Other Judaism acknowledged 'deities' include other mountain ranges, for example 'The Weaver' which is a mountain range in Romania, Mt Fuji in Japan and ZerMatt in Switzerland. These are all crystal conduits of 'G-dness'.

You wouldn't try to find a Synagogue or a Church there, if you were a Mystic, remote-viewer or 'spiritual' you would go try to find a cave to meditate in. Letting all the energy of the mountain come to you to change your perception.

These are called 'Pilgrimages' and are traditions in certain countries.

Even singing in church on a sunday as a get together activity or going to Synagogue for Shabbat are traditions to help people align with the frequencies of the Divine and "the Life Force".

It's possible to remote-view what I'm saying and decide for yourself.

"Keep your traditions."

Slavery also is a tradition. I don't want to keep it.

"Traditions are often based on a cherished book or a sacred text, but they can also often be based on a section, a talisman, even just geometry."

You're looking at the second step while ignoring the first. Every tradition starts with how parents treat their children. This is because of how children learn – they learn by example.

If parents have a certain habit, children will adopt that habit very soon. The habit then will become a tradition over time.