So, I thought about how we could get remote viewers to attach to the truth of a target, instead of what the tasker wants the target to be. It sounds like it's not that important, but if you consider that remote viewing of dreams is possible, or that telepathic overlay could overwrite things, seeing the truth of a target might be more difficult than expected.

The first question is: What even is the truth?

Starting definition: Truth is that which is. This definition doesn't account for time though. For example, an ISBE just is, and because of that, the ISBE is true. But if you ask where the ISBE is now, where it was in the past, or where it will be in the future, we need a different type of truth – which I will call "local truth".

A local truth does not mean that it's only true at a certain locality and not true anywhere else. A local truth is true everywhere. Local in this context means something different: It means that you can understand – or describe – the truth only with the knowledge of locality within space and time.

Here's an example: Last night at 3am, I was in my bed, sleeping. This is a universal truth. But this truth is attached to spacetime coordinates. It's a truth about me in relation to the whole universe. My bed is a place. Last night 3 am is a point in time. The truth about this situation can't be described without describing relations (my body lying on the bed, night time in Germany, etc.)

So, if this was a remote viewing target, the tasker would have to provide the spacetime coordinates in a way such that the viewer's consciousness can understand where to look.

Now, AOL and distractions come into play. What if the viewer was looking at this boring target, but there's something else in the vicinity that draws attention. The other thing is not part of the target, but it's more interesting, or easier to understand. For example, there's a cat outside, and the viewer becomes aware of it because it's jumping around.

These thoughts led me to an idea. Maybe other remote viewers already had that idea, but I have not come across it yet.

My idea is a technique I call "Navigational Overlay" – or just: the Map.

Instead of writing on one paper at a time, you have a second paper next to it. This paper is the Map. The Map is a simple coordinate system with an x-axis and a y-axis.

The truth of the target is in the center of that coordinate system.

The x-axis is the timeline the target is on. The y-axis is another aspect I will explain later.

Now, if the viewer has an AOL (analytic overlay) while doing the session, he/she doesn't just put it aside as usual, but instead, puts it on the Map. If the AOL lies in the past of the target, the viewer marks a spot on the left side of the coordinate system. If it lies in the future, the viewer will mark a sport on the right side.

This means that the viewer can formalize how far the AOL deviates from the target, based on the intention to connect with truth, independent of what viewer and tasker want to be true.

This doesn't just include deviation in time, but also deviation in space. That's what the y-axis is for. For example, it's totally possible that the viewer hits the correct time, but wanders off (because the cat in the vicinity is more interesting). A positive value on the y-axis (everything above the x-axis) means something else is more interesting in a positive sense. A negative value (everything below the x-axis) is a negative distraction.

Now there's a special case we have to consider: The perception of the target could be blocked or manipulated.

We can use the Map to make visible whether the truth is hidden or not. In order to do that, we can use a technique called triangulation. What is triangulation? In trigonometry and geometry, triangulation is the process of determining the location of a point by forming triangles to the point from known points.

It sounds complicated, but bear with me, it's actually really simple.

We need 3 points, and two of those must be known truths. Those two are the reference points. The third point is the target.

The viewer now marks the reference points on the Map. As the references can't be blocked or manipulated by whoever doesn't want you to see the target, the Map now will show you the true relation between the reference points and the target.

Here's an example for better understanding:

The target is the death of Jeffrey Epstein. That target is blocked by a third unknown entity, such that a potential assassin can't be seen. The tasker chooses the following two reference points: The prison cell 1 day before Epstein's death, and a potential assassion 1 day after Epstein died.

Expected result at reference point 1: Epstein inside the prison cell, alive.

Expected result at reference point 2: Another subject, not Epstein.

Reference point 1 must lay on the x-axis of the map, left to the target.

If reference point 2 also lays on the x-axis of the map, but right to the target, we know that there is an assassin on the same timeline. If reference point 2 deviates from the x-axis to a positive value (upwards), the assassin is not part of the same timeline. If it deviates downwards, there is no assassin at all.

Obviously doing remote viewing without a blind target and know the target is dumb. You can't always trust the mind to fill in the blanks and it could be partially right but get other things wrong...remote viewing must be done with blind target, maybe even double blind. Like Aziz is given the target but he isn't given what it is, he then assigns it to the remote viewers, which would be more reliable than a target that is known.

Dick Algire did his remote sessions on his break at his job. He did some special breathing process and wait for the movie. I've closed my eyes before and see a tv screen come up and a scenery going only I can't see what is going on in the movie, it's really hard to get the TV to come into full focus of what is on it. Dick says it was real like he was in it or the person who he was viewing. He thought it was odd it was just some guy shopping, looking at suits...so they were testing to see if the remote viewers could remote view him shopping not knowing their target.

@Nancy:

Not one word I've written suggests to do remote viewing without a blind target.

@Nancy:

"Either way, Epstein isn't dead."

Of course he's not dead, because ISBEs can't be killed. But he could have lost his body to get out of the prison.

@Nancy:

If he was into cloning, the easiest way to get out of the prison would be to "die" and then go into the cloned body.

There would be no need for prison guards to snuck him out.

@Nancy:

Well, they do have the technology to transfer an ISBE into another body, because they are using it every day with us humans.

@Nancy:

What you are saying makes no sense.

1. An ISBE is individuated consciousness. You distinguishing between consciousness and ISBE is the belief that there are beings that are not connected to the source, which is impossible. The bad guys are connected to the source – that's why they exist in the first place. The only difference is that they can't use the life energy on the basis of love. They made the decision to reject the source, which led to them feeling positive about being negative. They need suffering of others in order to create so-called loosh within themselves, while normal people need love to create loosh within themselves.

2. The reason why their clones don't last very long is this: The cloned bodies have built-in breaking points. It's a way of controlling the ISBE that is using the cloned body. It has nothing to do with consciousness.

Regarding Epstein, we have two main possibilities:

1. He was killed inside the prison. If this is true, it's because he lost his status inside the prison planet system, which would mean that he was processed by the death traps to get rid of him. This also means that the purpose of clones was not to get him out. He would have lost access to clones if he lost his status.

2. He didn't lose his status and therefore wasn't killed. If that's the case, the purpose of the clones is to distract the public from his true whereabouts. But this leads to an interesting question: Why not just kill a clone in order to prove to the public that he is dead? This would be so much easier.

Also, how does Farsight's remote viewings fit into the picture?

The question is: Why is the target protected in the first place? What do they try to prevent us from seeing?

And this is where the Map can help.

@Nancy:

If you are so convinced that everything is fake, why are you bothering to talk to me at all?