Wars looming over-head, over-seas, across the world, even across planets.
How-ever, wars or «battles» are not solely in the «form» of physical-combat, but also...:
➜ Economic (who holds the wealth/resources?)
➜ Information-Brokerage (who holds the «intel» to «screw the other guy over» even harder?)
➜ Paradigmatic (who/what can gain & maintain «loyalty» of subjects/followers/believers?)
➜ Legalese (there is a saying: «The pen is mightier than the sword...»)
Alright, with that out of the way, everyone likes to point the finger at the others, how-ever...:
➜ Chinese: Well-known «atrocity» involves Organ-Harvesting of Falun-Gong Practitioners
➜ Russia: Former U.S.S.R. was known to have the «Stalin» Regime
➜ Iran: Patrick Bet-David is probably a better source of this since he is from Iran
➜ Canada: https://cedarvia.ca/resources/injustice-and-reform/crimes-of-canada
➜ United States: Prison-Capital (25+% of world's prison-population; less than 4% world-population)
➜ Germany: Holocaust? (Although the «narrative» may not be entirely accurate)
➜ Singapore: A «Fine» Country (you'll get «fined» for up to 5000$SG for chewing gum)
➜ Israel: Even many Israelis & Israeli-Jews are opposed to a well-known Zionist-Agenda
➜ Venezuela: https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/253261.pdf
➜ Ukraine: The Maidan-Massacre (Significant Pivotal-Point in Recent World-War-History)
➜ Hong Kong: The Triads
➜ Japan: The Yakuza
➜ Mexico: Known for Drug-Cartel Problems/Issues
➜ Various Other Countries: Various «Histories» That Challenge the «Pride» of Their Members
One thing I've noticed? The treatment and attitudes are a lot like «Sports-Teams» and their «Fans» who want to «Cheer» for one «side» or another. When I lived at South-Eastern South Dakota? One of the most-common «complaints» that I heard: «Must be a Vikings fan.»
When I lived at Northern-Minnesota? One of the most-frequent «complaints» that I heard:
«Must be a Packers fan.» At Western-Washington state? «Must be a Steelers fan.»
It really does come across like... a «religious» belief to be for the «side» of one particular «sports-team» or another (also applies to countries). When I lived and worked over-seas back during the «American-Dominance» era, everyone seemed to have and make this assumption that Americans were all rich people, everybody wanted to move to America, get an American-Education, American-Universities being the «prestigious» institution where you're supposed to get a degree to secure the best financial-future possible (never-mind the fact that it's closer to being a nation of the world's most-literate burger-flippers; but, even then, the actual literacy rates are actually embarrassing as exposed by Mark Dice, and many don't even have the «privilege» of being able to flip burgers, due to so many now actually being amongst the «homeless» populations, etc).
Is America the «greatest country» in the world? When I went to school at Canada during my child-hood years, Canada was said and taught to be the best country in the whole entire world. Many people swear by America as being the greatest country; certainly America has been very world-influential, but, there is also a difference between «America» versus the «United States» versus the «united States of America» and various other combinations and configurations of wording.
The point of this thread is to ultimately point out one of my own observations of the following:
➜ Faction.A calls out Faction.B for having done Offense.01 against Faction.A
➜ Faction.A seems to conveniently leave out the fact that Faction.A committed Offense.02 against Faction.B prior to Faction.A's «retaliation» against Faction.B
➜ This is similar to those «debates» where Dogmatic-Paradigm-Locked.Person-A chooses to «cherry pick» their «evidence» against Paradigm-Locked.Person-B who also «cherry picks» their own evidence against the «opponent» of Paradigm-Locked.Person-A instead of genuine Truth-Seeking
➜ This is similar to how the Drug-Companies engage in the «File-Drawer Effect» where they only publish the «successful-trials» whilst burying and/or hiding the results of the «drug-trials» that failed to achieve statistical-significance that would not meet FDA-Approval Standards
➜ This is similar to how the «pseudo-skeptics» seem to want to play gymnastics-with-semantics in order to maintain their dogmatic-belief in «Materialism» by finding «semantics-twisting ways» that distort the actual-meanings of words to force the evidence to fit their pre-existing a priori belief-system(s) rather than bothering to update their paradigm to match with observed evidence
➜ This is similar to when people ask for your answer(s)/response(s) to their «hypothetical» questions where it is akin to picking the vantage-point of one blind man out of the five blind men who are describing an elephant than treating that answer as representative of the whole entire elephant
There is a good reason why this following «passage» is one of the most-important in human-history:
«Hypocrites! First remove the beam(s)/log(s) out of your own eye(s) so that you may see clearly BEFORE you try to remove the sliver/speck-of-dust out of the eye of your neighbour/brother true who is simply trying to help/assist you!» -Mathew 7:5
Without doing that, you «blind» yourself, treating your one singular «tree» of «knowledge» as-if though it represents the whole entire «forest» of reality, and, I get it, all of us have some sort of «skeletons in our closets» that we would like to bury or past-experiences that may have been so traumatising and/or embarrassing that we'd much rather «forget» that it ever happened or even existed.
What matters now? Stopping the «cycles» of «revenge» because otherwise...
➜ Fellow.A kills Fellow.B because Fellow.B chopped off Fellow.A's hand in the past...
➜ However, Fellow.B chopped off Fellow.A's hand because Fellow.A stole from Fellow.B
➜ How-ever, Fellow.A stole from Fellow.B because Fellow.B was abusive to Fellow.A
➜ How-ever, Fellow.B was abusive to Fellow.A because Fellow.A missed a piece of dust
People need to «get over» and «over-come» their «authoritarian-tendencies» over others;
There is only ONE way to use «force» without the associated lingering consequences.
I have already described numerous times in the past of the Universal Free-Will-Law.
Don't under-estimate how much «complicity» you are under when paying fines, taxes, etc.;
This very act «funds» the «control-systems» that are «enslaving» YOU!
Time-Stamp: 030TL04m07d/18h44Z