My position (and sure you can troll it and we can make a bunch of ad hominem barks , that's fun too)

Seeing the world kind of unravel, hopefully it continues, violently if necessary, sorry to innocent victims of such things,

My position is that there are at least 3 moral positions / beliefs / whatever that seem contradictory but in fact converge. They are all fine, they are all acceptable to me even when they seem strongly morally juxtaposed.

The first is the pacifist, as Courtney self proclaims. Ideally, these are preppers. They don't just try to live in peace, they prepare for danger. They don't just hide out, they speak their opinions because being quiet about violence is not pacifist, that supports tye violence by complacency.

The second, quite contrary, is the "terrorist". Now days, the quasi-authority that parades itself under color of law (that includes all courts in the United States of America that do not have a grand jury - that includes all police officers aka road pirates across the united states of america - that includes all soldiers who fight abroad under US military - that includes all members of the Crown Temple BAR) , has created a false narrative that creates a slippery slope which defines anyone they feel like to be a terrorist. These people have all committed perjury and enforce terrorist violence while easily calling you a terrorist. But that's not my point. I'm actually not opposed to these sorts of extremists (the ones that the fake colour of law deems "terrorist" even viilent ones) . But their reason for acting is very sticky. First of all they can never hide behind religious doctrine. They can never assume that their own protection is justified. Typically what we are looking at here is angry lynch mobs, not RPG bearing caliphates (notice "caliphate" has an islamic tone) - but even those may prove to have some beneficial effect.

The third is the law-abiders. In the USA there is another term for these people: the Sovcits. Everyone else is committing perjury for a simple reason. If the law of the land is that citizens are the sovereign and you claim to be citizen but not sovereign you commit perjury.

There is only one real purpose for this message.

These 3 moral stances are, believe it or not, compatible.

Now come trolls and feast. I put out some lovely kibble for you 😉