One of the quickest ways of removing jurisdictional authority over your assets from the statanists is to put everything in a Trust. Preferably a Private Irrevocable Trust, in which you are the beneficiary.

Obviously, a root issue is you need to find someone you trust, as Trustee. This can work mutually, if you both become Trustee of each other's assets of a mutual equivalency.

"Sir I can't authorize you to tow it for the simple reason that it's not mine. I'm just the beneficiary"

"Sir I can't authorize you to seize the guns for the simple reason that they're not mine. I'm just the beneficiary."

"Sir I can't pay tax on this cafe for the simple reason that it's not mine I'm just the beneficiary."

---

It creates a shield over everything you have against the tyrant's seizure. It creates for them a dilemma. To seize your assets they ...

need to return to courts of equity, essentially de jure processes; processes that are almost nonexistent now but they did exist in a time before statanism. They are forced to build courts that they no longer really have.

If you bond it by silver they have a dillemma. They can try to get the silver equivalent of the Trust but even if they manage to get that far, all they can ever get is a silver equivalent. And how do you measure the equivalent? Well they ...

need to return to courts of equity, essentially de jure processes; processes that are almost nonexistent now but they did exist in a time before statanism. They are forced to build courts that they no longer have.

---

Who taught us Trusts? The Jesus that Farsight remote viewed. It's a clever concept that subverts empirical tyranny by mutual exchange that they really have a hard time demonizing and twisting.