In the latest Spotlight titled "Nothing in Life is Free", Courtney explained that the threat of walking away must be believable, so people can't take advantage of you.

But here's the thing: I don't believe this "threat" anymore.

I don't believe anymore that the so-called good ETs are here to help humanity.

I believe that they are here because they don't have the choice to ignore humanity.

If they walked away, humanity will be transformed into a military force inside the system of the bad guys. They will be used to attack and conquer the good ETs. This has already been confirmed.

So, the intention of the good ETs is to convince humanity to not do that.

And this actually means that the good ETs need help from us.

See, now I could turn it around. I could use the threat to walk away, and not help the good ETs.

But I won't do that. I'm willing to help the good ETs.

I adhere to the non-aggression principle. This means that I will never attack another being unless the other being attacks me first.

I promise that I will not follow a system that wants me to aggress against others.

I promise that I will not follow orders – or laws – that try to command me to attack you.

But I need the same thing in return...

Actually, what Courtney said makes perfect sense if you're looking at it from a human point of view. How do we learn get outside help? I still think that learning about our true origins might be necessary to change fundamentally, otherwise, we'll stay on the same path. How can you change if you don't know the truth?

Wars on Earth are caused by our ignorance in the first place. Fundamentally, if we knew the truth, our decisions might be different. Why is America fighting with Iran if we know that we were placed here during some forgotten space war? The divisions among humans would be entirely different.
Unfortunately, this world is not going to wake up on its own without a little help.
After the mess, the "bad apples" might need to be sent to another place, wherever that is, because they aren't willing to be in partnership with the so-called good ETs farsight says watching us.

How many humans follow the non-aggression principle?

How many humans follow the principle of self-defense, based on the knowledge that you own yourself?

From the good ETs perspective, this planet is still the enemy.

Isn't it interesting that the ETs Farsight is in contact with never talk about this? How can we make the choice, if the majority doesn't even know what the choice is about?

Instead, Farsight's narrative points to a totally different choice: Who we want to team up with.

It's not about principles, or morality.

And this, to me, already is a red flag.

Having a hard time buying into the good ET narrative of not intervening until “we” make the decision to change. First of all, who is “we”?

If they mean humanity as a whole, we are screwed. The bad ETs have no reservation about working with the cabal, and the cabal has no interest in changing wagging our finger at them won’t change a thing. so what am I missing?

@helm:

Possibility 1: The so-called good ETs still believe in authority, as most humans do. But this would make them another taste of bad guys who just want to get control over the human population.

Possibility 2: The good ETs want us to come to an understanding of why the belief in authority is wrong without telling us directly. Show, don't tell.

Possibility 3: I am one of the good ETs and fulfill the role of telling you (which I can't prove to you). This would raise the question why Harvey, Ebonique, or Farsight aren't telling you.

See, there's still the possibility that this is a lesson. Maybe the good ETs believe that if they told us, we could align with them for the wrong reason? (Because we would see the good ETs as the new authority, which they don't want to be.)