So, with the wilderness ahead, we should start to think about what type of system we want to rebuild.

What type of civilization we want to be.

After centuries of political division and indoctrination, there's a high probability that many humans will rebuild the system they are used to, because they don't even recognize how politics implemented slavery.

I'm talking about the holy cow of democracy.

Quote from another forum user:

"Democratic freedom: The ability to vote based on freely educated political will-formation."

What people need to understand: Yes, there's the ability to vote, but there is no right to vote. Because what are people voting for? Exactly: Governments.

If nobody has the right to rule over others, then nobody has the right to vote for people who rule over others.

Democracy is just another form of slavery, in which the slaves are made to believe that they are participating in the process of decision-making. It's the most-sophisticated form of slavery, because the slaves think that they are free, while in reality, they are voting for – and therefore consenting to – aggression against other humans.

I highly recommend to watch the movie Jones Plantation:

Well our slavery is better than their slavery....LOL

What is the need for governance? What types of people survive the falling of a nation or civilization?

Surely people who survive it to rebuild wouldn't need or want 'gooberment'. You believe there's anyone actually voting here? The only thing we choose if we're being honest is the 'lessor of two evils'.

Sovereign people don't need leaders, they put on their big boy/girl pants and unite and help each other out.
These folks goal is to get rid of organic life on this planet....and it's an A.I. invasion we are dealing with...not so much ETs, there's eighty some races.

We humans need to just work on being sovereign and perhaps if SHTF you have a plan. Or setting up a committee that can organize and help to keep things going smoothly but that there'd be no one in particular in charge of any one, just so things can get organized.

Heck, instead of being afraid of what might happen after the world crumbles, like most that just stand around and wait for saviors, start now and imagine how awesome the world would be if we got rid of all the ETs and Archons ourselves...because at this point the ETs aren't going to help, and the so called good guys would never intervene or help until the fight was already won.

They need more Astral Warriors to do this work cuz this isn't done here, they'd created the 'above so below' artificial construct, this mirror world, and most 'sheeple' don't see it...these are the ones you might need to worry about in a crisis, they don't have a plan, they don't make their own choices...they're the 'order followers' like Mark Passio speaks about.

A hug to all the 'conspiracy theory' folks....they (we) were right all along.

Let's not wait till they do their 'movie' Armageddon. Let's do what we're able to go after the real enemy instead of waiting for 'good' ETs to help.

Demo(n)cracy was never constitutional. It was introduced in order to stage the hegelian dialectic. Such as deuchebag who doesn't know vs turd sandwich who doesn't care.

A republic is an administrator to the people, not a decision maker, in the same way that a judge is administrator to the jury, not a decision maker.

These clever scumbags figured out that all you have to do is pull a little switch. Introduce a sort of republic, and sort of courts, and sort of rights, and sort of constitutions, and sort of money.

Now we speak full babel. Words without a real understanding of their meaning. I understand, I face that same dilemma. But we have a number of moments in history where people were in fact overpowering the statanists.

And here's what I think is the most dire lesson. ET factiobs might push us in a multitude of directions, but unless we do it ourselves in a rather short window of time: we're pretty screwed

@Tazz:

"Words without a real understanding of their meaning."

Then let's talk about your holy republic.

➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_publica

"Res publica, also spelled rēs pūblica to indicate vowel length, is a Latin phrase, loosely meaning "public affair". It is the root of the word republic, and commonwealth has traditionally been used as a synonym for it; however, translations vary widely according to the context. Res is a nominative singular Latin noun for a substantive or concrete thing (matter, thing, affair)—as opposed to spes, which means something unreal or ethereal—and publica is an attributive adjective meaning "of or pertaining to the public, people", hence a literal translation is "the thing, affair of the public," or "the thing, affair of the people.""

So, in a republic, the "right of the people" weighs more than the right of the individual. It's a collective where the people can decide that an individual has fewer rights than the collective. In other words: The individual is owned by the collective.

That's why it's called "affair of the public". Because the affair of the individual doesn't count.

This is slavery based on the illusion that a "public welfare" can be achieved if people are made subjects (slaves) of the (re)public.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/78273-what-i-hate-so-much

Dear Tazz, is your holy constitution a LAW that people are FORCED TO FOLLOW, or is it a contract that people have the free will choice to accept or reject?

No constitution is "the right one" , there are groups forming their own nations with their own foundational law. Those folks are doing great things. However, they do so by addressing the laws that are cherished by big numbers.

If you subscribe to natural laws, power simply derives from big groups of individuals, like it or not. Use it instead of wishing it wasn't real.

@Tazz:

"If you subscribe to natural laws, power simply derives from big groups of individuals, like it or not. Use it instead of wishing it wasn't real."

So, you believe that you can wield the "ring of power" because you are different?

You obviously are a collectivist. The individual doesn't count, because... POWER!!1

That's why you belong to the bad guys.

You give us so many Lectures of things that we learned in Primary School.

@David Lyon:

"...none of his content seems to have any relationship to Farsight content as far as I can determine."

This topic has everything to do with Farsight content, because the people's belief in authority is the reason why Earth is a prison planet. Without the belief in authority, the prison wouldn't work.

"If any Adult wants to understand Democracy they can register themselves as a Political Candidate as I have done in the past, go campaigning and get Votes. As I have done."

So, you have been willing to get votes in order to do what? Use violence against people on behalf of your voters? And you still believe that this is a right?

Did you learn that in Primary School?

@ David Lyon
'Where did you register as a Political Candidate ?'
-I had the chance of a political career, but I rejected: Too dirty job in the swamp.... I know that since I was a teenager.
I had several politicians in my socioeconomics/politics advanced course, in school - back then already federal leaders of the youth organizations (head and vice chairman) of two big parties, and had even also a now former financial minister at that school during that time. They went straight to federal and state parliaments right after finishing school. So I grew up in a political environment (e.g. shared the same table 6 hours per week for 3 years with a federal youth chairman of a governing party) and know such things very well. Also got elected to a non-political expert seat in a city council committee, when I was 19. I experienced strategic political/party influencing attempts first hand -even at the lowest levels of political decision making.
The main ability as a political candidate you need, is being able to manipulate an audience by rhetorical means. The political direction does not matter for professional politicians -they can take any standpoint and defend it with ease. We trained this a lot in role-plays. The professional politicians joined special training programs for this by their parties.
If the audience realizes the manipulation (for example by an unsuccessful politician attempting to speak for them as a group and making his own personal goal-oriented opinion to look like "common sense") or if the opponent discussion partner exposes such a low-level dirty rhetorical trick: he will loose the debate. And that will be very frustrating for him...
So I answered your question, but you did not answer my question, yet... Are you avoiding that purposefully, or wasn't there actually anybody else than yourself who you were speaking for when you wrote "us" and "we"?
Which party did you run for as a Political Candidate? (You should answer at least this question -it would just be fair, as I told you my personal political background when you asked for it.)