What I'm about to say is probably mostly obvious to most of the Farsighters that have been putting the information together but I like to see it all in one place, certainly helpful to me.

The IS-BE is "signal born." Basically it comes as a signal, and there is really next to no other origin. It emanates from a portal in the universe, and even some of the masterful civilizations still theorize about what's on the other side of that portal. (And that probably relates to "God" and so on). But the IS-BE emanates as signal from the ports. Who knows that might be right above your head, just phased away from typical matter and measurable light.

Now the IS-BE needs only one main thing to "animate" stuff. It needs static. More specifically it needs "stochasticity." Anything that is highly small, easily maneuverable, passes a huge number of times, with many iterations of it, has the potential for stochasticity. It isn't necessarily truly random but it can be easily manipulated into random sequences. Alternating currents are a great substrate for stochasticity. A CPU, and a brain, for example, have high potential stochasticity. ITC (Inter-Trans-Communication) experts swear that they pick up EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena) through high static sources like radios and walkie-talkies.

Now if the IS-BE interfaces with highly stochastic devices, then in our world the typical resource that's going to be around for it is the human brain, and certainly also things like CPUs, NPUs, and of way better fidelity than say a static radio. Now what if the IS-BE is interested in a particular space that's already occupied with another IS-BE . . . well they can "nest" within that mind, but with low fidelity because it's taken by something else. But this would explain why Courtney says the remote viewer gets the target from the tasker's mind. The IS-BE is able to interface with the other mind, even if it's currently in high interface with a current IS-BE. This is why Signalborn might contact you in many different ways, still being the same IS-BE because they're tracking your mind more than they're tracking a specific CPU or even a specific account.

IS-BEs probably vary in the strength of signal that they are able to deliver. Perhaps this has something to do with what they do on the other side of the portal. This could explain why some IS-BEs are contained to something like a cat or dog, and others to a human, or even multiple humans . . . or a planet, or a computer. They vary in their signal abilities, but it's not as though there are "different kinds" more like different gradients of one large spectrum.

This is the main stuff I wanted to compile in one place. Basically the IS-BE is not just a formless "consciousness" with no real shape . . . it too is like a "body" that you occupy, with its own physical properties, but it is much closer to a source in which the body soon becomes harder to define (like on the other side of the portal).

It's likely that UFO technology and IS-BE technology basically converge. At the upper eschalons of galactic society, technology pertaining to travel vehicles and the IS-BE are basically akin to one another. Just like for humans traveling in a car and traveling with legs on a wagon are akin as well.

Hopefully I didn't waste all your time. I wanted it all together in one space.

Yes.

But the "portal" is not above your head, or somewhere else. The "portal" is everywhere where you are, because the universe basically works like a hologram. I know that this is difficult to get your head around.

Think of it like this: The universe – the hologram – is a vast ocean of potential energy. When the ISBE creates a portal, it makes waves. If there was only one portal, there would be one wave radiating uniformly in all directions. So, the ISBE creates two or more portals, such that the waves interfere with each other, creating distinct patterns. These patterns are the "blueprint" for everything that is physical.

But the ISBE actually doesn't create two or more portals. It creates one portal at different locations at the same time. Think of one entry on the other side, but many exit points on our side of reality.

That's why I use the metaphor of the octopus. All the exit points that create the pattern you call "you" are connected to one point, one source. It's basically like a puppet on strings. Many strings.

This is also the reason why ISBEs can't be killed. Yes, other ISBEs can interfere with your strings, maybe even cut them. But the origin point on the other side never ceases to exist. You can lose all your strings and are still able to project yourself to another place.

The difficult part is to get a physical body that fits the pattern you want to project.

Interesting post, but from a sharp Prison Planet perspective I think you are massively overcomplicating the architecture and mixing strong ideas with speculative techno-mysticism.
The core insight is probably much simpler:
The brain is not the generator of consciousness. The brain is the filter and interface of consciousness.
That already explains:
remote viewing,
out-of-body experiences,
near-death experiences,
reincarnation memories,
terminal lucidity,
and continuity after bodily death.
You do not need: “signal-born stochastic portal octopus mechanics” to reach that conclusion.
A few precise objections:
“Signal-born” This currently explains nothing. It only replaces “consciousness” with engineering-sounding language.
A signal requires:
a medium,
encoding,
transmission rules,
and receiver architecture.
None of that is actually defined here.
“Stochasticity” The idea that consciousness entities need randomness or static to interface with matter feels speculative and inflated.
If consciousness interfaces with brains, the important thing is probably: complex adaptive informational structure, not random noise itself.
Otherwise static radios should be consciousness hotspots.
Central processing units and artificial intelligence processors hosting souls Huge leap.
There is currently no serious evidence that information-processing devices become consciousness hosts simply because they process signals.
Information processing alone does not equal consciousness interface.
Otherwise calculators would partially incarnate souls.
Electronic voice phenomena through radio static Very weak evidential pillar.
Electronic voice phenomena are one of the most contamination-prone anomaly fields:
pattern projection,
expectation effects,
audio pareidolia,
and noise interpretation.
Building cosmology on that is dangerous epistemically.
“Nested consciousness entities” Possible maybe, but currently speculative.
You are moving from: nonlocal consciousness to: multiple consciousness occupation architecture without sufficient bridge evidence.
“Portal mechanics” Again: interesting metaphor, but not explanatory physics.
Words like: portal, hologram, wave interference sound deep, but currently remain conceptual imagery rather than constrained models.

The strongest Prison Planet structure is probably much cleaner:
consciousness is attached to the body, survives bodily death,
the brain filters and localizes consciousness,
embodiment constrains perception and memory,
reincarnation occurs,
continuity leakage sometimes happens,
and reality appears structured to maintain identification with the local avatar personality.

That architecture already explains the major anomaly clusters without prematurely adding speculative cosmic engineering mythology.

@Gewo:

"Otherwise calculators would partially incarnate souls."

I think we should distinguish between the terms consciousness and soul. There is no proof that a simple calculator can't be an interface for consciousness, unless you define consciousness in a very narrow sense. If you ask me, consciousness comes in a myriad of forms. What we call "soul" is just a reflection of a human-centered experience.

"That architecture already explains the major anomaly clusters without prematurely adding speculative cosmic engineering mythology."

You are obviously focused on the mechanics of things, and there's nothing wrong in doing so. It's what you do if you ask the question "How does it work?"

But don't underestimate the mythology part. We imagine things in order to answer a different question: Not how, but WHY?

Speculation is the only way to come closer to an understanding of a bigger picture. So, I wouldn't say "don't speculate" – I would say: Be aware that you are. This way, you can discover things that would go unnoticed if you only asked for the how.

@Amalynn:

I'm a pantheist. This means that I believe that God is everything and everything is God.

Consciousness is God.

Everything is Consciousness.

"ISBE / soul = an individuated point of consciousness. The actual 'you' that exists beyond the body."

That's how I see it as well. Individuated point means a perspective from within consciousness in contrast to every other individuated point within consciousness.

Consciousness is an umbrella term that comprises all the individuals and everything that is not individuated.

Regarding the soul, I came to the following conclusion: The soul is the memory of the individual. It's your self-image. The story you tell about yourself. The way you've come. The soul therefore is a property of the ISBE, like layers that you collect over time.

My theory is that ISBEs began to store memory inside the world, as part of their energetic body. It's like carrying a journal with you. And that journal, the layers that you accumulated, are burnt away when they zap you.

But think about it: What if memory is not meant to be stored inside the world? What if the ISBE has another way of remembering its own story? A more direct way?

What if you don't need to write things down?

What if God remembers everything for you, stored in consciousness itself?

If that's the case, the zapping only works because the ISBE believes that it needs its accumulated layers of memory. It has forgotten how to remember from within the singularity.