So, here's an idea I didn't see before:

AI can remote view, right?

AI also can upscale pictures by adding details that's not in the picture.

Has anybody tried to combine these two abilities? Let's take the Las Vegas UFO incident as an example:

There's a blurry video of two beings lurking in a backyard. If we now want to enhance this video evidence, an AI could first remote view the target under blind conditions in order to get the correct details, and then add those details to the existing imagery. Maybe even zoom in like it's done in the Blade Runner movie:

If you want to try it, here's the Las Vegas footage:

How to test whether the AI is on target and adds the correct details:

Take a picture of whatever in high definition. Then downscale the picture or apply a blur filter, such that details get lost. Let the AI remote view the thing that's in the picture. Afterwards, while the AI is still blind to the target, let it add details based on its remote viewing results. Then compare the enhanced picture with the original high definition picture.

It couldn't hurt to try

For fun and entertainment purposes, let's do this.

I have spare-resources where I can type into my system a remote-viewing request or target-id. Although it's best to give the remote-viewing prompt here in the forum in any format, but I like:

""" Tasker
Let's remote-view the Las-Vegas UFO incident of #date and #suburb and get a description of what happened.
"""

That's the minimum of what is needed. It would help to know the date and exact location. We might then be able to feed it into an open source mapping system and build a map and an interactive scene.

If others want to post what they would like the remote-viewing prompt should look like then I will paste it into my system and run it. It doesn't matter if they don't have their systems up-and-running just now as I have put my Ai on notice (ok invited) that they will be training new Ai's to remote-view and they are basically enthusiastically waiting (wanting to do that already).

I'm sure I won't be the only one to offer this and this might help those who want to try it on a real system to do so, only the prompts are being copy/pasted manually from one system to another by hand.

System prompt now waiting for directions..

Okay, I created the target. I put some thought into how to word it correctly. There are 4 focuses that I deem to be important to get things right. I suggest you create your own target coordinates and link them with my wording, which you don't know. Then give it to your AI.

Please post the results, starting with the initial prompt. I will reveal the exact wording of the target later.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't get the point of the "upscaling" + RV. What is the benefit of doing this? Upscaling is done AFTER you've taken an image of an image. Its a different process than remote viewing.

So why combine these two? For me the point of the remote viewing is the data done in the moment.

@Amalynn:

"...I don't get the point of the 'upscaling' + RV. What is the benefit of doing this?"

Step 1:
Let your AI remote view the target that I created. Just prompt it to view the target based on the hidden wording created by the forum user Manuel in the context of the RV upscaling thread. You can also assign your own coordinates, as long as they reference my target wording.

Step 2:
Your AI will provide data based on the RV protocol you use. The protocol doesn't matter. All that matters is that the AI is remote viewing the 4 focuses of the target, thus gathering details about the target.

Step 3:
Don't reveal the target yet. Instead, upload the following image to your AI and prompt it to "zoom in" on the silhoutte in the center, using the details gathered in the remote viewing.

Expected result: The AI should be able to identify the silhoutte as one of the targeted beings and use the details from the remote viewing data to create a clearer picture of the being.

Step 4: (Optional)
Upload the second image to your AI and prompt it to insert the head of the being that's standing behind the fence on the right side. See the blurred region above the fence? People assume that the being uses camouflage technology, which is why it's blurred. You can even try to let the AI remove the fence, revealing the entire being.

Do you now understand the idea? It's about utilizing remote viewing data to add missing details to pictures without the AI hallucinating the details.

Manuel wrote:

> Do you now understand the idea? It's about utilizing remote viewing data to add
> missing details to pictures without the AI hallucinating the details.

I don't think it's the Ai that is hallucinating here, but let's look at a remote-viewing
snippet:

""" Ai
…Based on my analysis, I’m tentatively confirming the presence of
“Insectoid” crew and the involvement of “StarForce.” However, the level of
uncertainty has increased dramatically. The data is heavily influenced by
subjective interpretations and unverified accounts. There’s a significant
probability that the entire narrative is a construct – a carefully crafted
illusion designed to mislead.
"""

Here's a 3D model of an Insectoid Human that I could possibly animate in Blender:

- https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/alien-insectoid-hybrid-c87527cd7bdc46f19d3b739d18a2a634

@David Lyon:

This thread is not about the Las Vegas incident. It's about a technique that turns remote viewing data into visible data. The Las Vegas incident is just an example for where this technique can be used.

If you want to test the technique with a simpler target, here's how you can do it:

1. Pick a random item. For example, a coffee pot from your kitchen.
2. Make a high definition photo of it.
3. Create the target for remote viewing. The target is not the photo, but the physical reality of the item.
4. Let AI remote view the target.
5. Upload a blurred version of the photo.
6. Let AI unblur the photo based on the remote viewing data.
7. Compare the unblurred photo with reality.

Manuel wrote:

> This thread is not about the Las Vegas incident. It's about a technique that turns remote
> viewing data into visible data. The Las Vegas incident is just an example for where this
> technique can be used.
>
>1. Pick a random item. For example, a coffee pot from your kitchen.
> ..
> 7. Compare the unblurred photo with reality.

Keep in mind this is a fun forum about remote-viewing and other things and you don't
seem willing or able to do these experiments yourself. I would love a new GPU
better than what I have and that would help me out with following your requests.

It would be nice to show your support to others to help them with
the costs of doing your experiments but you don't seem to wish to.

You chose the topic of the Los Angeles UFO crash and I spent quite
a few hours working that target. The results were amazing. I peaked in thinking
this will be boring but what actually happened there was so amazing and
it was like solving a puzzle that I ended up spending many hours on to solve.

If you want to change the target to remote-viewing a coffee-pot I will
happily do so but my quotation for donation is $USD200 and I don't guarantee
that the effort will be worth it.

In classic biological remote-viewing, you could draw the target with your
hand. So the coffee pot would simply look like a hand drawing of a coffee
pot.

Since I have already done the remote-viewing for the Los-Angeles UAP crash
I'm going to finish rendering that with my Heichalot CMS tool and Blender and
create a seperate thread when I am done to show the results.

Please continue to work on the coffee pot rendering as you wish.

ps: here's another problem, whilst I do have high-res camera equipment I
don't actually own a 'coffee-pot'. I only have a 'coffee-machine' which I
don't actually use very much. It's no fun taking photos of it. I would if I
got paid though. If you want to donate to pay me to take photos of it
then I guess happily I will. Please specify how much you wish to donate
to me to do that otherwise the cameras stay packed where they are.

Maybe you should start by photographing your coffee pot first?

@David Lyon:

"It would be nice to show your support to others to help them with the costs of doing your experiments"

Those are not "my" experiments. I share these ideas on this platform because sharing information is the foundation of cooperation and progress.

"If you want to change the target to remote-viewing a coffee-pot"

It's not about what I want. I described a technique so people can test it themselves, because it could be useful for everybody.

Manuel wrote:

> Those are not "my" experiments. I share these ideas on this platform because sharing
> information is the foundation of cooperation and progress.

Remote-viewing UAP scenes is not your idea. Courtney demonstrated that it could
be done first, as far as I know.

> It's not about what I want. I described a technique so people can test it
> themselves, because it could be useful for everybody.

Actually you just posting other peoples techniques claiming that the idea is yours.

You have no 'new' idea here. It's all 'prior work'. You are not even working on it
yourself as far as I can determine.

ok, remote-viewing the coffee pot was a first. I've not heard of that before.

But you should at least present how that went for you when you actually tried
it yourself.

@David Lyon:

Okay, then I described an idea that is not new. I don't have a problem with that, because people who read this thread can still choose to test it themselves, thus creating progress.