Genuine good people follow simple rules:
1. Offer cooperation.
2. If the other accepts cooperation, continue to cooperate.
3. If the other rejects cooperation, respect the rejection.
4. If the other aggresses against you, retaliate.
5. If retaliation was successful, offer cooperation again.
This is a simple algorithm that everyone can understand. Humans know this algorithm by the name "Tit-for-tat":
For comparison, the "algorithm" of a bad person:
1. Demand obedience.
2. If the other accepts obedience, continue to own it.
3. If the other rejects obedience, condemn the rejection.
4. If the other defends itself against you, retaliate.
5. If retaliation was successful, demand obedience again.
Now, what if your "third eye" is able to see, via deep mind probe, what algorithm a person is following?
The two models can be put on a scale say axis-p with endpoints of 'a' and 'b'. Viewer can do Subject deep mind probe and still be blind to axis-p.
But from what Farsight seems to suggest, consciousness in general seems to lean toward the first model. Which is why their cognitive scales seem to remain based on compromised thinking vs genuine thinking. So the distinction seems to be more generally "are they really themselves". Except characters like Zeus seem to be the rare type that simply leans toward the secondary.