B TOMASEVIC - ROKVIC
less than a minute ago
PR image: a woman in bikini. Are you serious? You cannot be serious.
What will be attractive to the eye? I already commented on this, I understand your viewpoint, but I still disagree. Its like oil and water. They simply dont mix together. Half but naked avatar giving RV data. It is bizzare to say the least. It is not just bad taste,or out of place. It is bizzare. People who employ PR teams, and guess what, I left their platforms. You are forcing me to write this, and I really dont want to. We live in post-Epstein files world, of mass children, and women traficking, sex exploitation, rape, torture, domestic violence, the misogyny is at its worst that it has ever been. I went on a beach with my husband recently, I dont want to even write what I encountered. Men up to their 40s are completely screwed, they are mentally ill. I dont know how else to describe them. They are sadistic, even to complete strangers, passer byes. And you are basically feeding into that same sick mindset. Women are not better. They are as bad. Collective consciousness has def shifted. Just the world feels off. I cannot go along with your stuff. I dont care.

I used to worry that the world was getting too desensitized. There were all kinds of "concerned advertisers" about it in the 90s.

But in my experience psychology just doesn't work that way. We've been completely misled. "Oh their fragile minds will be exposed to inappropriate things"

Honestly we are born with a sense of good and evil and we will navigate as we see fit if we just stop being constrained. Weird bikinis and thongs and leather and jumpsuits are not exactly my cup of tea. But these things are not the same as child-raping pedovores who pose as celebrities and drink baby adrenochrome blood. They ought not to be lumped together.

I hope you consider keeping with farsight weird or not

I didn't see the "PR" image you're talking about.

I like Courtney Brown, but he is still the same person who thought Jack the Ripper was a good target to give to his remote viewers (and clearly traumatized them). Was there any benefit of such a target apart from his own morbid curiosity over a historical example of brutal sexual violence against women? I don't see one.

Is Farsight willing to use sexualized images of women to benefit their bottom line and their mission? Probably.

Yeme Jene did some very bad visual images of herself in a thong of some kind if I recall that made it difficult to even listen to the remote viewing session because her ass was visually centered on the screen. I still don't remember what that one was about because I turned it off.

Having said that, their market may be men with a lot of time on their hands, not women who are going to be annoyed rather than wowed at a MK ultraed style sex kitten assassin's ass front and center in the video. I'd guess their audience of viewers lean toward men.

Having said that, much of the remote viewing is worthwhile seeing for the data. I recommend you not follow anyone in farsight for their views like it is a cult. Think for yourself. Make up your own mind about things. View their data. Some of what they do is good. Some isn't. Note that people tend to be consistent. If someone is willing to exploit women for their own benefit or to give their remote viewers targets like "Jack the Ripper", then note that is part of their core values and their frame of reference for the world.

There may be a difference in scale between "child raping pedovores" who pose as celebrities and regular men who see women as objects for their exploitation and extraction. The core law "extraction" is the same. A difference in scale doesn't change the basic law of operation.

Really just depends on which «demographics» one is trying to reach;

Women in bikinis is good for targeting young teenage-males in particular.

A portion of Corey Rudl's book, R.I.P. to him since the early 2000s, explained how hiring a model in a bikini at a car-fair when you bring your Ferrari Roma or Lambourghini Countache (which you could also have just rented rather than necessarily needing to own one), you could set-up a stand or booth and «sell» polaroid-photos to the teenage-males to sit in the car with the bikini-model, and those male high-school students would just lap it up and you'd be making bank by hundreds of $$$ by the end of the day since it really would be worth it to them to spend 100$US to have such a photo of themselves with some «hot babe» sitting at the passenger-seat (or even 500$US sitting upon the lap).

That being mentioned, the question that comes to mind for me are, essentially, what is the «demographic-audience» who is most-likely to choose to learn about and investigate in and into and actually do and field-test and practice actual blind-protocol remote-viewing for themselves?

That certainly puts a big question-mark on my mind... I should probably also mention the various «trends» that I have seen in «populations» like video-games and multi-player video-games... most games had historically been designed such that the vast majority of gamers were almost always primarily male... eventually, certain games ended up having a higher-percentage of females, but, the «competitive» and «PvP-Oriented» games still remain primarily male-dominated, whilst games with the combination of better aesthetics and longer-form game-play (like those MMORPGs) tended to get a closer male:female balance-ratio (other than the 80% of the female-characters actually being just guys pretending to be girls or because of those weirdoes who make 80+ different characters and accounts since they obviously got too much free-time on their hands that no-one else has).

Heck, even in animé, some shows just seem to gain a wider gender-diversified audience than other titles and releases. Some «re-actions» do tend to be over-board, though; and I am not a fan of the «police» (due to how corrupt their whole entire industry has become) nor «thought-policing» (think 1984 as authored by George Orwell) nor «censorship» (consider all of those legitimate-voices who had been shadow-banned, de-platformed, de-monetised, etc.; modern-day versions of book-burning, dis-information, mis-information, astro-turfing, character-assassinations, even literal-assassinations, propaganda, social-engineering, and, various other forms of mind-control and narrative-control) .

Are we «over-reacting» to certain aesthetic-expressions in a similar-manner to how a racist might express disgust or hostility towards someone of some particular skin-complexion just because of the physical-appearance even when no interference into free-will had occurred? I certainly hope not.

Time-Stamp: 030TL06m06d/20h46Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)