Humans have this blatant blind-spot of only being able to «see» over the course of ONE «generation» as IF though there had NEVER been prior-generations.

Suppose a man raped a woman, then dies, then is re-incarnated as a woman (or even again as a man) where the «memory slate» has been «wiped clean» for the next life-cycle.

Does that «new» woman (or man) «deserve» to get raped?
For that particular life-time of no complicity to it the answer is obviously NO.

However, what if it becomes known that the woman (or man) was a rapist before, from a previous-life incarnation, would he (or she) «deserve» to get «raped» for past-complicity?

How about if YOU were «tasked» with MAXIMISING the «suffering» of a «rapist» and you had «god-like powers» to be ABLE to do so; what would be a «fair sentencing» ?

P.S.: The «after-life» is FULL of «rapist» who are EAGERLY WAITING and «drooling» over being able to «dine upon» and «rape the rapists» once their ISBEs exit the flesh.

Here is another question: What if a man or woman «hired» their government-forces to go and «invade Russia/Ukraine/Japan/China/Iran/Iraq/Afghanistan/etc./etc.» and the «invasion» happened to involved PLENTY of «raping of all the women whilst killing off all the men» would that man or woman who «hired» that sort of genocide be deemed to be «deserving of rape» or is it PERFECTLY FINE for them to have «gotten off "scott-free"» for their not just complicity but literal DIRECT-SUPPORT of of the «raping» of thousands or possibly even millions of women?

Will you choose to «avoid the hard questions» like a certain someone?

Suppose George Soros and «the usual suspects» amongst the «Epstein» groups who only represent a mere tip-of-the-iceberg were «beings/ISBEs» who had committed these «atrocities» on a PLANETARY scale or even GALACTIC-SCALE... THEN what...?

Would they THEN deemed to be someone who «deserves» to be «memory wiped» and «re-incarnated» into a mortal-being who is then «raped» under MAXIMUM-SUFFERING conditions? No? They DON'T deserve it? Also, for those who apparently have AMNESIA about the FACT that almost the WHOLE ENTIRE WORLD-POPULATION went freaking «bonkers» and were FULL of «insanity» over the CONvid-19 issue, IF the woman (or man whether «re-incarnated» or not) had FORCED others into «taking the jab/vaxx» AND to be put on «Remdesivir» (with a KNOWN fatality rate EXCEEDING 50% which is why I had NEVER gotten FDA-Approved) would THAT «act» upon others be deemed or considered to be a «rape» (or MURDER) or do you expect a «peaceful-response» unto these people who SCREAMED that «YOU ARE EVIL» FROM THE TOP OF THEIR LUNGS because you CHOSE to «remain unvaccinated» or «didn't support Ukraine/Russia» and other such «nuances» that a certain very active someone on these forums seems to ignore?

Peace Out. Or maybe to hell with peace and let's just reduce EVERY last «building» on Earth down to RUBBLE and bring EVERYTHING to a SCREECHING HALT (businesses, schools, electricity, food, Internet, travel, water, services, governments, tecnnology, A.I., EVERYTHING)...

Time-Stamp: 030TL06m27d/13h45Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)

@Aéius Cercle:

"However, what if it becomes known that the woman (or man) was a rapist before, from a previous-life incarnation, would he (or she) «deserve» to get «raped» for past-complicity?"

No.

"How about if YOU were «tasked» with MAXIMISING the «suffering» of a «rapist»..."

Maximising the suffering of a rapist doesn't solve the problem. Only evil loves to maximise suffering. That's why evil loves to be the judge. It's an excuse to use power to maximise suffering.

"...and you had «god-like powers» to be ABLE to do so; what would be a «fair sentencing» ?"

Have you ever considered to not follow the orders of your evil master and stop being someone who maximises suffering?

"Suppose George Soros and «the usual suspects» amongst the «Epstein» groups who only represent a mere tip-of-the-iceberg were «beings/ISBEs» who had committed these «atrocities» on a PLANETARY scale or even GALACTIC-SCALE... THEN what...? Would they THEN deemed to be someone who «deserves» to be «memory wiped» and «re-incarnated» into a mortal-being who is then «raped» under MAXIMUM-SUFFERING conditions?"

No.

"No? They DON'T deserve it?"

Exactly.

Let me put it this way: Imagine you have children, and they do something stupid. Your approach is to hit them as a punishment. You hit them every time they make a mistake, explaining to them that it's their fault, but not explaining how to avoid the mistake in the future. No, it's even worse: Your children lose their memories, so they can never learn to become better. But it doesn't occur to you that this creates a vicious cycle. You go on hitting them, making everything worse.

How well does your approach work so far?

Two wrongs don't make a right. The law of karma is an archon concept that they use to keep us here in cycles. To me the new person who did that stuff in a previous life but can't remember could totally turn things around in a new life if they were given a chance to do it right. Who knows what the person went thru in their childhood that made them think it was ok to do such a thing to anyone in the first place. Many of these children in the death cults are told they do this (rape) to them because they love them. That is what they tell them. These children are damaged from birth by their parents who are in these satanic cults and it's disgusting, but they think it's love.
So in my view, the karmic past life thing is bullshit because the new person isn't going to know what they did in a previous life, and hasn't been asked if they are sorry for their actions and wish to apologize to the person, not that it makes it better or erases it, but if a person has realized what they did was wrong...and ask for forgiveness from their victim, then perhaps they wouldn't need to experience it. I agree with you that this way of karma is like a chain that never ends.
So 'two wrongs don't make it right'. This is why revenge is wrong and that this doesn't break the chain.