Things along these lines have been discussed already but I don't know if it boiled down to this. This is largely based on Farsight ethos based on what they've discussed.

There are seemingly 4 major factions competing for Earth. 2 "good guys" , 2 "bad guys" The Orions (annunaki), the Draco, the Domain, the Federation.

The Draco follow a strict tier system of a governing class, a warrior class, and a slave class. IS-BEs are highly prevented from ever changing classes but some rare exceptions get made.

The Orions come from a highly complex legal system where consent is more codified and "have-nots" typically remain have-nots, which basically argues that "stupid is equivalent to evil". They want to on-board us to their system but mostly as the have-nots and they have skirmishes with the Dracos but largely they're willing to do business for mutual gain. I think they feel uncertain about their future survival, but they have a lot of IS-BEs that will not be so eager to be put to justice by the federation

The galactic federation has rebelled against both Draco and Orions, pushing them to the fringe of the galaxy. They value freedom and would like to see tge galaxy enjoy its own sovereignty

The Domain plans on assimilating the galaxy into their stewardship, but it would not enjoy the same type of individual sovereignty. They consider freedom ... pretty high on the list but allow various IS-BE prisons to form within their constraints. I suspect the Draco actually occupy sectors within the Domain but are just more heavily restricted wherever the Domain exists.

---

That being said, it doesn't necessarily do much for us in the here and now even if it hovered around the truth. But something like this would be a bit of an explanation when it comes to the strange secret societies that were formed and their rules and competitions.

I don't trust a particular philosophy. I think an appropriate goal is a mean or median between the conceptual elements.

I also believe behavior is ballot. But what are you trying to vote for? Perhaps Somewhere, anywhere, not on an edge. Whatever that might mean.

I think at some point humanity will be shocked at the total numbers of beings out there that have or are visiting this planet. The number of factions could be equally large.

I find one thing concerning:

The latest Spotlight is titled "ET Factions", and Courtney made very clear that whoever is not speaking about factions, those are not the good guys.

But we still don't know who the ETs that Farsight is in contact with belong to. They don't identify themselves, and we can't identify them either. What are we supposed to make of that?

Channelers and "contactees" often give us a whole plethora ethos of types and beings, they say it plain matter-of-fact "oh yes this is the bikinbok from planet tumtum" - goes on forever.

I get why I wouldn't want to get swept up in that. It would make sense to expect the population to put together the puzzle moreso based on evidence.

It sure would be nice though if Farsight's NHI group had a symbol, a flag ... something

There's only one narrative: The ETs Farsight is in contact with are the "good guys".

Without further information and evidence, I can only suggest to stick to principles. If they don't adhere to the non-aggression principle, they are not the good guys, regardless of how they call themselves.

To me, the 4 factions look like this:

Draco: aggressive, therefore bad guys
Orions: aggressive, therefore bad guys
Domain: aggressive, therefore bad guys

Galactic Federation: Not sure. The Federation seems to value tolerance and diversity on a national level, but also seems to be built on the basis of governments that are allowed to be aggressive against their own people.

A "faction" by definition "is a group or clique within a larger group, party, government, organization, or the like, typically having different opinions and interests than the larger group".

If there are "factions" then they are all part of the same overall organization or larger group but are at odds with one another for various reasons.

We know a few things (about Farsight) based on what they say (and nothing stops anyone from remote viewing further as Edward did):

they identify themselves as opposed to the group they see as controlling the planet but locked in with neither side winning
they have brought different types of beings to the "board meetings" (greys, reptilian, jellyfish-type/aquatic, AI)
they create hybrid grey/humanoid offspring
they do subtle things to create a "breaking point" and breakdown in societies on earth as a way to break the standoff
they want disclosure
they get "shot down" and captured by human/ET allied space programs
they want to "show the math" as it were and they tell you they've suggested viewing targets to Courtney
they openly tell you Courtney and Aziz have grey hybrid children and they've brought them to "meet" the audience
they have "commanders" who are Courtney's "boss"
they want freedom
they want people to be aware and have direct information (remote viewing capacity)
they want people to be aware that much of the galaxy works with telepathy as a form of communication
they want people to be aware earth is a prison planet and they aren't "free"
they want to expose who/what/when/where of what is controlling earth and beyond
they give a narrative, but they also show the math (ie, their remote viewing data)

@Amalynn:

"If there are 'factions' then they are all part of the same overall organization or larger group but are at odds with one another for various reasons."

Correct. They are factions of ISBEs, who have all the same rights by nature. The ISBEs are at odds with each other because some ISBEs believe they have more rights than others. So they create factions based on the idea that a collective stands above the individual, resulting in aggressive behavior against individuals and other factions.

"We know a few things (about Farsight) based on what they say"

This is second hand knowledge, also called hearsay. You don't know by evidence. All you know is what they say.

"and nothing stops anyone from remote viewing further"

That's all well and good, but we actually still don't know whether the remote viewing yields objective data. Remote viewers can be manipulated. Targets can be protected. Remote viewers also can view fictional stuff without recognizing it's fiction.

We actually don't know. I haven't seen strong evidence from Farsight so far. They say remote viewing proves everything if different viewers get the same data. But if the viewers are manipulated in the same way, or all of them connect telepathically to the same source, corroboration doesn't prove anything.

I haven't seen different types of beings at the board meetings. I've seen humans who claim that they see beings that are invisible to the camera.

Can we now just remote view them and in doing so, see the truth? See, Lacerta claimed to be able to project a different image of herself into the minds of humans. If that's a possibility – and there's no rational reason to ignore that possibility – we need to know how to detect and circumvent these psychic manipulations. If we don't know how to do that, we can't actually trust what we see in our own minds.

The ETs want us to believe them, and to believe what we remote view, without physical evidence.

This still feels fishy to me.