It’s hard to believe in your independence and that you are telling the truth.
After israel invaded and ravaged Gaza and killed at least 135,000 Palestinians, you “suggested” and claimed that the Palestinians started it.
Every sane person knows that this is a lie; israel is behind every war and act of terrorism, seeking to annex the Middle East and control all oil reserves— for Greater israel.
Ergo: everything you claim must be taken with a grain of salt.

9/11 was also an act of israeli terrorism; radar images and security camera footage prove that a missile fired from an Israeli submarine docked at the Washington Navy Yard struck the Pentagon.

> israel is behind every war and act of terrorism

Wow. That's amazing.

I'm sure you are including wars when it didn't even exist as a country?

Do you have a quote that Farsight indicated Palestinians starting a conflict?

I don't rebut anything about the evil nature of Israel.

The political states as they exist (the legal UN nations) are all evil in my opinion. All centralized authority on earth must die. Israel is certainly a good start.

It doesn't matter to me at all who you believe.
People have been given the right to choose for themselves.
History doesn't lie; they just try to distort it.
There was a reason why, 2,000 years ago, a certain ethnic group was excluded from European society.
The Bible (the unaltered version from the 1800s) also states that they were not chosen, but rejected.
You need to research and read European history.
But if you only have a little time: Henry Makow

Thank you for your comment; as far as I'm concerned, I'm done here.
The right to choose: Do you believe everything you're told, or do you seek the truth?

This post does not attack any religious group: it questions the "facts" "suggested" by the site.

Why are you done so quickly? Is Farsight irrelevant?

I like to think that if remote viewing is consistently practiced and measurably legitimate, I would gladly take an arrogant remote viewer with obscene commentary; over someone who takes every political caution they can conceive of and yet avoids remote viewing because of doubt.

Humanity is incredibly stupid because of its slow ambivalence toward a practice that challenges virtually everything about our paradigm