You're assuming that the powers that be don't want disclosure. What if the agenda was disclosure and eventually alignment with some extraterrestrial military. Disclosure for military reasons would make a lot of sense. The powers that be will likely try to leverage disclosure for their reasons. JFK's plan decades ago for potentially more benevolent reasons might not have fit with their agenda or timing.

The PTSNB (Powers-That-Should-Not-Be) most-certainly want «Disclosure» but for it to come in the form of the «Alien-Invasion» Narrative where they want «humanity to unite under a one-world government in order to have any modicum of chances to be able to repel the alien-invasion threat» which is essentially that one-world-religion system that even I know how to «orchestrate» through carefully controlled and curated information that builds up over the span of multiple centuries since subtle-changes over each subsequent-generation makes deceptively mis-leading information look more and more «normal» by making each sub-sequent generation grow up without ever having known a different «reality» than to simply accept authoritarianism and materialism from birth...

Time-Stamp: 030TL07m08d/19h30Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)

> You're assuming that the powers that be don't want disclosure.

and you are assuming that I have not done any remote-viewing on what exactly will happen.

Actually my position is data-driven. I "have the memo" about what is going to happen.

The Political discussion about different groups intentions is really of no interest to me. I'm more interested in the actual major event as it will be experienced on the ground.

I will publish the data this week, it can be seen or not seen, and drop out of this thread.

OK, it'll be interesting to hear your data. I think remote viewing the future is hard though. The future is in always in motion.... The political stuff is interesting to me though. It's like a chess game. If one side is going to disclose something, there's a reason for it and the other side will react. I'm assuming all sides (could even be more than two), perhaps the political puppet string masters, have r.v. and they're all viewing possible futures and always adjusting their moves and countermeasures.

Yeah, if the US government is disclosing something about ETs this year, I don't trust it completely. The best I can hope for is that something happens with it that actually helps freedom.

Manuel wrote:

> but no WTF moment,

I don't think that's correct.

> and no aliens showing up.

That's so sad.

I'm obviously talking about the video of the Future Forecasters linked above. The title of the video is:

"Remote Viewer Describes the Moment the World Reacts to Something Nobody Expected"

In reality, there was no moment the world reacted to something nobody expected.

Manuel wrote:

> In reality, there was no moment the world reacted to something nobody expected.

It seems like you don't know how remote-viewing works and what it sees and what it doesn't.

Daz could have been explaining the collective consciousness of the crowd.

I admit that sometimes they tend to talk up the dramatic, and if you had done much remote-viewing of future events you would know that this is a characteristic of the remote-viewing process itself.

I did remote-view the World Cup before it happened and I didn't detect any evidence of a UFO interaction but then again I didn't have any high-speed Infrared cameras pointed at the games.

I think that you need to publish your own remote-viewings of the future so that we can scrutinise them and help you understand what types of results are normal and what sort of results are not.

I’ve been remote viewing over 15 years following CRV method. When viewing the future, you’re not necessarily seeing possibilities and timelines like people want you to think. You’re simply interpreting data from the subconscious mind. When it turns out to not be accurate, simply the viewer is wrong. Every professional school of remote viewing understands that, only farsight says we viewed a different timeline or we prevented it, nonsense. It’s ok to acknowledge that you can be off target from time to time, nobody is a 100 percent perfect. It’s easy to be in a session and be on target and then the conscious mind jumps in and you start making things up but you don’t know that you’re doing that and because these “professional viewers” aren’t solving crimes or getting real feedback they don’t know. Esoteric targets for advanced viewers should be maybe 1% of there sessions or it will be like ARV where you’re good in the begging but suck long term because your conscious mind starts putting together a story. And before you no it, there’s reptilians only in every session. Dick and Daz did predict Covid quite accurately a few years in advance. There predictions for the next few years are nothing like farsights predictions, will be interesting to see who is right.