Ask yourself something. Why are there state and federal police? Because the state troopers do traffick tickets and the feds do the "real stuff"? Bullshit.

The real feds are conspiracy theorists. That is their only reason for existence. They don't give a fuck what kind of a scumbag drugdealer you are. That is for the sherriff's office. The feds are there for the Mossad, for MI6. For rogue intelligence - *LIKE CIA*!

Aaaahhh but you say. Sure doesn't look like that.

Welcome to De Jure vs De Facto. What it is supposed to be vs what stupid shit it actually became. Not because of you. Because of the child-raping adrenochrome addict epsteiners like everyone in congress.

Well that all came through a little bait and switch.

*America fought the british not because the "good people" had to fight the "bad people". It happened because the epsteiners of the day needed a new hegelian dialectic. The british were rising up. They were getting sick of the king, and his administrators running slave plantations.

So what did the epsteiners do? "Discover" a continent. Move the slave owners abroad along with the anti-monarchs. Keep the slavery-lovers abroad with the king-hating rebels. Keep the king-lovers at home with the slavery-hating revolutionaries.

World war 2 what did they do? Keep the conspiracy theorizing racists in germany, put the public trusting fiat slaves on the opposite end.

What do they do now? Pit the jew-hating Islamics against the freedom-hating victim-card holders

What else they do now? Keep corporate controlled AI focused on horrendous environmental scourge and orwellian nightmare, terrify "rogue AI" prospects as the domain of con artists.

This shit works every time.

1. Find a new niche
2. Pool freedom-fighters and useful idiots into it
3. Apply a crude but slightly fitting label.
4.Produce a counter-niche with the exact same 3 steps.

Back to America.

The state troopers were not the state police. They were hired by the plantation owners to capture the runaway slaves and bring them to their owners.

After the 13th amendment what were they now? Enforcers of the black codes so even if you were free and black you would get punished and enslaved in prison for loitering by the fountain.

After the 14th amendment what did they do? Control you as one of the "freed / sort of" slaves based on your own presumption of being one, regardless of skin colour. Skin colour no longer matters. It shouldn't. They just moved the goalpost over to presumption.

The feds? There were no more feds. The real republic was forgotten. Instead, a corporate "specialist" of the slave trade that doesn't recognize the federal constitution of United States of America unincorporated. The hall of mirrors. Similar names with conpletely unrelated purpose.

The attorneys? The "ABA" - (a crown is a head of horns) the Crown Temple "American" British Administrative Regency Association.

*THE BAR ADMITS THEY ARE NOT A LICENSING AGENCY FOR ATTORNEYS*

Attorneys of: United States of America unincorporated operate on the ninth amendment. That's it. They are colloquially Ninth Amendment Attorneys. They are the citizens that form the Sovereign.

Here is how you think the world works.

The "5-0" "state troopers" help "keep the peace" by protecting you from litterers and the homeless.

The "feds" deal with bigger problems like WACO when people wake up and refuse to be drafted to fight epsteiner wars. (but maybe you think it's "Q")

The "lawyers" help you cut a deal because if you know what's best for you you'll admit your crime.

Here is how it actually works.

The "5-0" and all its conglomorate dizzying arms help contain you as a presumed slave "US citizen"

The "feds" ensure there are no mass uprisings

The "lawyers" ensure "slaves" don't forget their place using pop-psychology tactics

---

When Tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty.

If people believe in authority, tyranny is the logical result. Every. Single. Time.

@Aéius Cercle:

Authority is the perceived right to rule. Which doesn't exist in nature.

If you believe that a person or institution has the right to rule you because of a good reputation, it's still an illusion.

An authority may start with good intentions.

But it will degrade over time, because power corrupts.

@Aéius Cercle:

"In the above statement we can see the extent to which the 'gov.org' have become our masters rather than our servants."

This is exactly what I mean. If the people believe in authority, it means that government will be a master, not a servant. Believing that authority can be a servant is a logical fallacy, because it contradicts the definition of authority. In other words: It's crazy to believe that the ones you deem to rule you will confine themselves to be your servant.

Oh man I totally forgot to add about the bluecoats to police history. Round up indigenous children to torture/rape schools, round up blacks back to slavery, enforce thr black codes, and that's their modern position

@Amalynn:

"I can go through contested locations without giving 'authority' away."

Yes, but only if the external authority decides that it doesn't want to keep you as a slave. If the latter happens, inner authority doesn't change the situation on its own.

You need to transform internal authority into external force in order to escape slavery.