So you know it's nothing new from me to tell you we're at war.

Not this "principalities" bullshit. That biblical reference is used to make it sound once again complacent. "We're at war with our personal values" give me a damn break.

A war. Like actual war with bombs and genocide and people dying and when you go "I'll just progress toward something better by picking a better way of living" let me ask you is that what you're gonna say while someone gers raped in front of you in broad daylight?

Anyways, here's the simplicity of it. Centralized AI and surveillance with drones is the modern weapon. It achieves both the psyop, the panopticon and the missile / vehicle guidance of tomorrow.

But it is currently quite vulnerable. The "boston tea party" style of trend is a real thing. The americans considered the tea tax the last straw that "broke the camel's back" late one night they threw the tea overboard to show they were done with british usurpation. They tarred and feathered tax collectors, there was a large rise of sabotage and occulted groups. This is why arguably the constitution viewed private militias (decentralized) as superior to central military.

Anyhow. The same fashion of enterprise is trending. People everywhere are refusing. Remote viewing, as Farsight describes, is a key piece of the puzzle. But if you think the uprising is a peaceful vector you have to be shitting me.

So people are saying they want privacy. Well the problem with that is Epstein class had loads of privacy. People want transparency. Well the problem with that is you have to let go of a convoluted idealized vision for transparency.

We all know the statanists employ constant double standards. Transparency for you, privacy for them. Subjugation for you, weaponization for them, memory loss for you, memory retention for them. Censorship for you, free speech for them.

The important part is not what they want. That's obvious. The important part is how they manipulate your own mixed feelings as a means to constantly co-opt your thinking.

You have to puck a vector. Not even a side. If you caress the wet dream of everything in its compartmentalized place you doom humanity with your naivety. These things are private but those things are public. These things are censored but those things are transparent. These things are free speech but those things are censored.

Give it up. You don't have those conveniences and you never did. Not on this planet in its form. The way I see it there are two simultaneous vectors that are workable

*Secrecy for strikes. Gather, shut up, block, plan, execute.
*Transparency for all else. If the panopticon statanists struggle to keep their systems private (because cryptography is a large inconvenience) then just use their game. Make mass surveillance also transparent surveillance. Don't tell the police. Tell the world. Don't call your governor. Call the world. Don't just stop privately reaching out to authority. Assume there is no authority. They aren't law entities they are all criminal cartels the world over.

So it becomes s question then. Whom is the real criminal? Where law becomes tyranny, resistance becomes duty. That resistance will not feasibly take the form of cautious taxpayers picking the organic grapes in the produce aisle and this is their contribution to the new world.

The real heroes will be those that hack, break, and possess their way - all while playing the usurpers game of chicanerous "logic."

*There is no peace in war*

The "world wars" was another psyop lie you were being fed. Because once you buy that, you deny the fact that the world always was at war for a very very long time. We just didn't know whom is on what side. Well slowly but surely that becomes more clear.

You either centralize, or you decentralize. And it doesn't look calm. It doesn't look happy. But it does look possible that decentralized xan won the day.