In the latest Farsight spotlight, Courtney says the war in Iran is winding down with a US defeat.

I don't think it's going to be that clean or that simple. I read today that the US is pulling its last carrier from the Asia/Pacific region.

Here's what I think: while the Iran crisis continues, the US lowers its defenses in Asia. At the same time, the Russia/Ukraine situation gets more desperate. Stress builds on multiple fronts.

A lot of focus by Courtney lately is on whether Trump was/is going to say a few words to disclose something in July...or August. This shouldn't be the primary focus. If Farsight's original data was correct...and I believe it probably will be... disclosure isn't going to revolve around an announcement. It's going to be the result of a cascade of paradigm shifting events...namely crises.

I think that's still on the table. The aliens wouldn't of course let Courtney know exactly when this is. He seems to have forgotten about it a bit himself. But that has to happen. For the paradigm to shift, the events that need to take place need to catch almost everyone off guard. Otherwise, it would be too easy to stop the paradigm for shifting for people who want the current paradigm.

Anyways, the point is, I'm still expecting stress on some systems at some point. The US is the trigger point. If it gets stressed, the whole body that is the Earth spasms. I still think that's on the table. I don't know when or how, but I've been feeling like someone is still trying to jackhammer the big bridge...it's holding for now and been holding for a while...but each week seems to stress the system more.

Disclosure will not come from an announcement but something much bigger, I feel.

You raising very good points.

@Just Another Isby:

"Disclosure will not come from an announcement but something much bigger, I feel."

Watch the moon.

I've been thinking lately that if the political system is compromised in terms of holding humanity back, and it seems to be, then the aliens would want to really plan to have a reset of the political system. They wouldn't use the broken system to facilitate the release of information so, logically, they would need to replace it first. It's not an indictment of any particular individual in the system other than that they can't be trusted not to be manipulated.

Replacing the world's political systems is not a small task, obviously. I don't know exactly how that can go with minimum casualties but the pattern I'm seeing in the world news right now is interesting.

@Just Another Isby:

There are ETs who want to replace the political system with a system based on their ideology.

And there are ETs (and humans) who want to remove the political system entirely, because politics is inherently unjust and incompatible with free will. The problem with this approach: Humans believe they need politics, because they have been indoctrinated by the bad guys.

If you now ask: Why is the political system inherently unjust and incompatible with free will?

Because politicians represent people who believe that they can use the violence of the majority to enforce what they think is right. It's a violent system that doesn't follow the non-aggression principle.

I think it has to do more with the limiting of information. If most could gauge the intentions of political leaders through telepathy or some other means, there would be a lot less deception. But I agree majority rule sometimes has problems too although some systems, like the US, are set up to prevent majorities from hurting minorities too much. The US is a rudimentary system probably compared to a system that others out there developed a long time ago. There are certainly a lot of possibilities as to "what ETs want" but if they're serious about freedom, they had a lot more time to think about it than we've had.

Something else: if the ETs want to foment political revolution as a result of crises, I'm starting to think after the USA midterm in November makes more sense. I waa operating under the assumption it'd happen before the midterm but there's an excellent chance the US is going to have a divided government in six months. As other crises happen that involve the US, there will be gridlock and inaction because the parties won't agree on anything. There are already diverging viewpoints on whether to stay or go in Iran and neither side is backing down with that or other issues. An overextended US economy and military at the same time there is an American constitutional crisis, precipitates a collapse. I think Courtney might be off on his interpretation of the timing but not the climax. It makes a lot of sense for the crises to happen next year. I figured it needed to happen before 2027 too because I listened to CB but actually I think logically it makes more sense for the crises to all come in 2027 or 2028 for that reason: political gridlock in US will happen then.

I know everyone is impatient and wants the good ETs to settle things next week. I don't think so though. The conditions need to be right. It's getting there but needs more time. Not a big deal to wait another year or two when you consider the time scale under which they allegedly operate.

People wanted DDay a couple of years earlier too. But careful planning and patience paid off in 1944. It's even more deliberate now.

I personally think the reading of "crisis" in political and military terms in relationship with "paradigm shift" and "disclosure" just isn't correct. People keep expecting to see violent "crisis" in the form of violent upheaval, military or political crisis or some other such dramatic event.

Thomas Kuhn is the one who popularized "crisis" in relationship with "paradigm shift" (Structure of Scientific Revolutions) and revolutions. And I honestly think the "good ET's" likely meant "crisis" more in alignment with how Kuhn characterizes it. You often have parallel paradigms operating simultaneously and you can't just argue with or change someone's mind who is operating from a different paradigm. They literally don't see it or they see you at war with them because you're coming from a different paradigm. I recommend a closer look at Kuhn for this one. Apply it to disclosure and paradigm shifting.