It's nearly one year since Charlie Kirk was murdered.
We still don't have any proper remote viewing data regarding that event.
Why do remote viewers – including Farsight – refrain from using the Charlie Kirk case to prove that remote viewing is real?
Because they'd probably be killed...they don't want anyone to see the truth. that is why they go after Candace so hard core. She isn't believing the narrative and most are seeing for themselves that something is wrong with the whole thing.
Why would they need to prove remote viewing is real? They already have many remote viewing groups. The only folks that don't think about remote viewing or think it's real are religious folks or typical scientists who may admit that there is consciousness but still can't provide hard evidence of it because it's woo or that magic is science and science is magic.
The truth will come out, but it's not going to be solved by remote viewing. We already know that it was a psyop, and either he was betrayed and is really dead, or he went to Vahalla aka Greenland where the others go into the program like witness protection or they really just got rid of him, maybe even both him and Erika to take over his organization, as usual money laundering and hijacking religion once again for their NWO.
@Nancy:
"The truth will come out, but it's not going to be solved by remote viewing."
I know. But the Charlie Kirk case is perfect for making people aware of remote viewing in order to advance consciousness, or even just to get views, and nobody is using that opportunity (except for Elizabeth April, who most likely is an asset of the bad guys).
I mean, remote viewers look at everything, but nobody did a project on Charlie Kirk? Why?
Maybe they have...BUT, to publicize it would probably put them on a hit list.
Pretty sure they'd see that Tyler Robinson didn't kill Charlie.
There were searches online for Tyler, the hospital and doctors they took him to which wasn't even the closest hospital, and no ambulance there...it's ludicris to watch it and see how incompetant they all are.
Maybe you or someone on here can do it. But definitely be careful because they never want this to get out until they can be the 'heros' in the grand scheme of things.
although Farsight has protection i believe is too risky to even publicly show that data, and from my point of view i don't believe this is that much important of a target, their are probably other targets that can be than more important..
Also if they did or wanted probably because they are focus on their video A.I. thing!
Oh yea shes such an asset of the bad guys and no pun intented lol or scarcasm
@Artur Faria:
"i don't believe this is that much important of a target, their are probably other targets that can be than more important."
That's not the point. Candace Owens has millions of people watching her podcast. If remote viewing is important for disclosure, then getting those people in touch with it is a high priority goal. If remote viewers deliver information that helps to solve the case, that goal would be reached.
So, why is this not a high priority?
i get the point.. use the the "biggest" influencers to acknowledge remote viewing as a tool to find out about whats and who's, just like JFK project.. however it's impossible for her not to realize this about remote viewing when Joe Rogan got many other guests that do remote viewing and speak about it in a good scientific manner that put remote viewing on the spotlight.. and she's paying attention to it like she always shows that she does and to be honest i get the feeling that she already used remote viewing data to know some few things and not just "the evidences" but "other data we had access to know this" like she talked about in the last podcast that PBD gave with her! just a felling!
@Artur Faria:
"to acknowledge remote viewing as a tool to find out about whats and who's, just like JFK project."
No, that's not the point. Solving criminal cases is not the primary goal. It's just a trigger.
Getting people in touch with their ISBE nature outside of religion is the goal.
"I know. But the Charlie Kirk case is perfect for making people aware of remote viewing in order to advance consciousness"
oh i see now your point.. yes agree.. it's one of the ultimate goals.. has we've been speaking for several time now!
That would at least be a topic a broader audience would be interested in and an opportunity for FS to engage with the rest of the truther community. I think Candace's swarm investigation approach fits well into RV context and the other way, too. The "swarm" could interpret data from different perspectives and follow details/hints from the data and match it with the real world. RV could inspire the real world investigation to search deeper into new or so far overseen aspects/directions of that case.
This early (live-stream 15 sept 2025) RV video by Elizabeth April about Charly Kirk has over 170k hits:
Remote Viewing What Happened To Charlie Kirk (RV/data content starts at 7:07)
She says it right out: Robinson has been set up to look like he has been the shooter. -A position not even Candace had at this early point in time...
But I would guess that FS is on a "higher mission" now -no resources for such worldly things any more...
@Manuel:
"(except for Elizabeth April, who most likely is an asset of the bad guys)."
@AdamRhysCampbell
"Oh yea shes such an asset of the bad guys and no pun intented lol or scarcasm "
Even though she was thought remote viewing through Farsight, with whom i don't remember, but i've been having a lot of questions where or how is she getting her information!
Regarding Elizabeth April:
"Even though she was thought remote viewing through Farsight"
Listen to what she is saying in the video. She doesn't even remote view under blind conditions. If she was taught remote viewing by Farsight, she doesn't apply anymore what she learned, which begs the question: Why?
The pretty ones are always the first ones they acquire.
Yes and she's been all over the place even in msm!
Elizabeth April did the Farsight classes to learn remote viewing. she then decided it wasn't the best way to do it, and formed her own way and yes, she don't do the blind targets because of course...that would take her more time. She looks in on them with her 'psychic eyes'.
Elizabeth April, I think, is one of the folks that was part of the Alex Collier, Danaan, Micheal Salla Exopolotics group. During the whole scam of White hats/Q stuff, she supposedly listened in on on of their calls somehow, and put out the info she wasn't suppose to do yet. Why she did that? She claimed to be talking to Valiant Thor directly where Danaan was talking to this guy as her resource. Once Alex Collier and Danaan heard what she was saying, they outed her from the group, said she was compromised, as her and Danaan were supposedly rescued from the grey ETs and had brain chips they used to communicate with them but now Elizabeth is supposedly just able to look at folks and see stuff. It's all quite so silly. I think like others, she gives pieces of truth out but with lies. Perhaps to have everyone listening to her because she just started a book tour and has gone thru all the alternative youtube channels.
She's been around for a long time, but I guess has scrubbed all the Valiant Thor videos of her supposedly talking to him and freaking out Danaan and Alex Collier.
Valiant Thor on the Why files: The Stranger at the Pentagon
Her story of being abducted by ETs:
Last but not least if that isn't enough for you, She's supposedly in contact with the Galactic Federation of Light whom Farsight has remote viewed. The Galactic Federation or all federations are corrupt and tyrannical, they have no plans to help humanity, in fact they help DARPA and those military factions against humans. She even has a Galactic Federation of light clothing:
15:26 --> Farsight