(title had too many characters for the algorithm)

Sovcits aren't using convoluted legalese to perpetuate more convoluted legalese. They are using it to force all around them to make it make sense or kill it.

They pay a bill with a bill not because they want to manipulate you. They are forcing you to make it make sense. The statutes say they can do it. And if you can't make it make sense, you are forced to honor their will or change the system.

If they force you to adhere to constitutional law, then they will use constitutional law until you find something that is immoral even though constitutional. At which point you are forced to make it make sense or honor your oath. And if you one day find your oath is to a nonsensical immoral constitution, it forces you to pledge a new oath.

And then they will go after your oaths. What did you pledge allegiance to? And if you can't make it make sense you must submit to honoring your new senseless oaths until you change once again.

These people are given a name in our society with whatever buzzwords pop up in an epoch. But they are a certain kind of IS-BE. They are here to audit everything you claim to stand for. They stand to get rich off your idiocies. Not by keeping secrets, but by exposing your own lies.

You may think they're just another thorn on the side while the "aliens get ready to save us."

But on the contrary. Wait for the aliens and you're fukd. Fight with words, fight with weapons, and in some cases fight by refusing to fight. Whatever it is: there are several battlegrounds and you don't need to pick "the right one." You just need to be in one.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/4l8w4ckwcfxig69edz3w1/Meet-and-Confer-Call-with-Carl-Glendale-Round-5-8-20-26.mp3?rlkey=6atnkqomahk0mhnheeo1fzb4w&st=tlzccwdv&dl=0

I don't understand what you mean by "make sense".

In Nazi Germany, the laws stated that Jews had less rights than Germans, until the laws allowed people to get rid of people.

In the United States, the slavery of black people was allowed by law.

What is the deciding factor that makes a law "make sense" for you? Asked differently: What violation has to take place such that laws don't make sense anymore?

It's a good question but basically nothing has to be driven from a fundamental understanding. It can all start from a top down approach.

The officer pulls me over for not having a registered license plate ...

I don't need to say: "here is why our society is corrupt and we live on a slave planet and we need the aliens to come help us"

Start with the context they were trained on.

"Ok so you have a code book saying that I'm supposed to have registered plates with the DMV but the DMV is an anti-theft program for residents which I'm not. So you can get curious and we can discuss it further or you can give me the ticket and I'll sue you it's up to you"

A later court conversation comes to where does the constitution apply

When application of the constitution is proven, a later conversation becomes: what if we don't adhere to the constitution? Can you not form a separate nation under a trust

When trusts are applied a later conversation includes whether the UTC is the governing body of Trust law or rather just a code book to define philosophical concepts behind them.

An entirely different code book that basically translates UTC and indicates how the rules are governed under its authority can be applied.

This continuum is pushing the same objective-

Define your understanding of how things *ought to work* and provide rationale subject to rigour.

Perhaps no UFO armada ever comes. Perhaps the entire system gets eaten apart from the very gears that it operates. Like some corrosive rather than hoping for some sudden crash.

@taz:

"Ok so you have a code book saying that I'm supposed to have registered plates with the DMV but the DMV is an anti-theft program for residents which I'm not."

They don't care whether you are a resident or not.

You still ignore the reality of the situation, so let me tell you: Why do they want you to have a registered plate? Because you are a slave that is able to damage the property of the slave owner. The house slaves within the administration bear the burden of controlling all slaves on behalf of the owner. License is insurance. It's their duty to prevent or minimize damage, and if they fail to do so, they are the ones who pay instead.

If you now say "I'm not a resident of this plantation", the house slaves don't care. Most of them don't even process that information, because the possibility of not being part of the plantation doesn't even occur to them.

"what if we don't adhere to the constitution?"

The slave owner then registers you as a danger to the plantation.

"An entirely different code book that basically translates UTC and indicates how the rules are governed under its authority can be applied."

Your delusion isn't even funny anymore. Do you really believe that the slave owner allows a different code book? I was part of a movement here in Germany. We wanted to do exactly that. This movement doesn't exist anymore. Let me tell you what they did:

They sent police to steal everything from us. Appeals at court didn't help, because if you accept the court, you accept their code book. You can't argue anymore that they don't have the right to rule you, because you already accepted their rules.

One of the rules is that every person that is against the state has no rights. Because the entire system is built on the illusion that rights come from the state. Without the state, you are outlawed.

So, if you want to secede from the existing state – which is what we tried – the authorities fall back into the mindset of an outlaw. They start to behave like amoral animals, because in their thinking, that's the world outside of the system. They don't care about laws anymore. All they care about is destroying you by all means.

Your fantasy that the slave owner sets you free because you make better laws is ridiculous.

But I guess you need the experience, as I did.