Quote from the latest Spotlight titled "The History of the Galaxy - Volume 1":

[38:02] "For those people who say: 'Oh, Courtney, this is all esoteric stuff. You don't have anything that's real.' What? You're stupid. They're stupid for saying stuff like that. So, when you hear people say stuff like that, what do you mean there's nothing verifiable? It's pyramids. These are huge pyramids in the middle of the desert with people in loincloths and camels running around and these whole pyramids. And both remote viewers, under totally blind conditions, not communicating with each other, are describing them exactly. They're not describing anything else. They're describing the Great Pyramids in the Giza plateau, and they're doing it exactly."

This doesn't prove that they saw the reality of the Great Pyramids at the given time.

It only proves that they saw what the tasker wanted them to see.

So, how do you prove that the data is not only a product of Courtney's mind?

How do you prove that the data hasn't been tampered with by the ETs when the remote viewers connect to them?

Don't you see the possibility that someone can use telepathy to manipulate remote viewers as soon as they believe that remote viewing will always yield correct data?

Don't you see the possibility that they could provide truth mixed with lies to make the lies more believable?

[39:12] "And then, since our remote viewers got all that right, they went on to describe the stuff that was new information, such as how did the blocks get there..."

The new information doesn't have to be right just because a remote viewer was right on other things, even if it makes sense.

Courtney, it's obvious that you want the data to be correct, and you want it so much that you are willing to violate the principles of the scientific method. Corroboration becomes proof. Correlation becomes causation. This should be questioned.