Farsight: We want disclosure. We want the secrets to end. We want full transparancy.

Also Farsight: If you want to know more, you must pay for our secrets, because it's technically impossible to publish things on our own website without having people to pay for it.

I don't want to allege a malicious intent. My point is: Farsight has not enough money, and this hints at a different problem: They are still dependent on the infrastructure of the prison planet, in this case, the money.

But the ETs that Farsight is working with should have seen this coming. They should have known that you can't "change the planet" while remaining dependent on the monetary system owned by the enemy.

One theory I have: The ETs use the willingness of the people to pay for Farsight as a measure to assess whether a free will choice towards disclosure is happening. But here's the problem with that: What if people are willing to pay, but can't? Especially when the shit hits the fan and the military starts to put emergency law into place.

So, my guess is that we are not learning an important lesson here: Changing the planet means to become independent of the infrastructure created by the bad guys – and this includes money as well.

In the Spotlight titled "Caves of Steel", Courtney talks about how much energy the AI needs to create the videos.

Money represents potential energy.

So, the lesson here is that Farsight still is totally dependent on the people who provide the energy, and if those people decide to pull the plug, Farsight can't do anything.

It's like, Farsight serves as the bad example that shows us why we fail to change the planet. We put our attention into creating and consuming videos, instead of working on how to become independent on the energetic level.

So, let me be clear: I would be willing to pay for Farsight again, but only if Farsight uses that money to become independent of their current energy supplier.

If Farsight fails to do that, why should people invest?