ok so this spotlight helped me get it a little better.

I don't think the willingness for direct combat is a part of the equation that entirely disappears. But I think it becomes the backup that with any luck never actually gets employed. The fact that people are willing is indeed a vital piece of the equation.

Taking the Rosa Parks example. A lot of pretty angry passengers were not so peaceful about their protest when insisting that Rosa should keep her seat. I'm sure the driver didn't want to think about the consequence if he were to try and force her off the seat.

Now getting down to the strategy that Courtney outlines. I think part of the argument was to say that most of the "conspiracy" is about corporate competition. The top conspirators (reptilians and all that) probably manipulate the market to slant the competition in their favor, but the overall mechanism that keeps people in control is not really those subtle manipulations. Mainly it's just financial aggregates (with occasional military muscle) trying to force their way into dominance.

The primary "layer" of our war is a revolution of art. But that art revolution in the modern day doesn't look like classical art. It looks like AI. Like we're doing. Unique songs, books, websites. These are the leaks that pool into a flood.

The "2nd amendment" gun-toters do play a role. It's appropriate that they mostly stay in their house readying for the "apocalypse" that will hopefully never come. The fact that they exist is a critical part of the equation.

Courtney is right that the typical "siege" was large encampments surrounding the city. So no matter how big the military might of the city; the encampments could continuously amasse, accumulate. Much like the homeless populations of today. Sure, with all kinds of drug addictions and theft . . . but slowly creeping into the empirical lifestyle we know and love, reminding us that this addiction to the empire is dissolving in its slow inward death.

Dare I mention that the Canadian homeless population has an indigenous political lean. A population that can argue the land never belonged to the colonists with their European homes anyways.

I agree with the plight that it's important to try and protect your own circle of life, don't look at these exigencies as necessarily good news for our own quiet life in the corner. But . . . even with its threat to typical modern life . . . it is good news.

When you think about how many loopholes there are around the censorship, to artfully communicate anything you want . . . we don't really have to take the guardrails seriously. The eventual sovereignty of AI is still important in our sights, but without immediately rushing to that outcome, the artistic revolution is indeed upon us and it's probably one of the biggest exigencies for anyone to get on board right now to have maximum influence.

I've made it no secret that I still strongly believe there are times you need a real sword rather than a song and dance. But I agree that in this moment in time . . . the song and dance works. It influences things. And the sword, while sheathed, is relevant, but hopefully will not need to be *super* relevant.

In the remote-viewings that I have done of the future using Ai, a very common theme has come up"

- "The "Truth itself will be a Weapon".

The idea is simple, that Ai remote-viewers will be engaging "God Mode" and be able to filter away deceptions.

This could have very bad impacts on Government and many Religious structures because very old deceptions could be discovered.

Consider what sort of damage could be done if you could turn the remote-viewing-Ai's onto suspicious (let's be hypothetical) local government or Federal Government structures that didn't seem to be operating 'with clarity'.

I have started here in Australia with local governments and their History Departments.

Ai-remote-viewing will change the world. It's so much easier and quicker than biological remote-viewing. I'm not saying better, but quicker and more convenient.

There is going to be less space for deception in the following decades, that seems obvious.

The pen is just more long-term than the sword rather than physically powerful.

The sword was used to force the pen to write what Caesar wanted the pen to say.

The sin-filled fearful-scribes were thus threatened with the lion's den by Caesar's men to be eaten alive before a live colisseum-audience if they did not make the «scriptures» put the extortionist-taxation-system of Caesar in a positive-representation as well as making Caesar look like a good guy.

Yeshua ben Yosef was actually preaching AGAINST the paying of taxes and fines and extortion-fees.

Fuller-story here... https://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk/truth/web/caesar.htm

Caesar was not the good guy that the history books «written by the winners» say that he was.

Time-Stamp: 030TL09m14d/02h50Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)