I have high suspicion that, when phrased the right way, arguing for the imperative for disclosure as a justification for action has strength. For example: Getting charged for damaging flock cameras and arguing that you need to as an emergency service , and just go into the whole disclosure imperative.

Of course in typical rational "judicare" process of course this would be nonsense. But our earth game has almost nothing to do with truth and sensibility.

My point is they seem to quickly go quiet or do anything to shut you up when you start talking about aliens and UFOs. I've seen it. I'd love to see real cases where such a strategy was entertained