Here's a completely different way, NON-HEIRARCHAL, NO BOSS method of organizing an RV group.

You have one "Organizer" or "Tasker". They pass out identical random tags to all viewers, and also complete a session record of their own for each target.

Each person in the group knows that one of the tags will be "theirs". They can either opt in for a "look ahead" at their own lives for 6 months or so into the future. Or, they can opt for "their" task to be something different, perhaps a longer term look at their own life and how to improve it, or some other target.

EACH VIEWER HAS TO SIGNAL BACK TO THE ORGANIZER THAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN DOWN "THEIR" TARGET CUE FOR "THEIR PARTICULAR" project.

Each viewer also has to opt in to do a session record, and the number of random tags passed out is

(Number_of_Viewers) + 1 tasker.

Once each person in the group has signalled they have done a session record for the current task, the organizer/tasker hands out a fresh tag.

So, at the end, each record has a stash of session records. They don't know which is "theirs" and which isn't, so every one is done blind.

The organizer also a set of session records. To get all of the other viewer's session records, they (the organizer) has to compute a list of which target belonged to which viewer (and they can get that through a random number generator).

So each viewer gets the tasking list, they can compare notes so they ALL got the same tasking list. They ALL get each of the sessions. BUT, the ones the care about are the ones which were THEIR particular project.

And at that point, everybody shares their session records. Everybody KNOWS which of the projects was "THEIRS".

This is completely different to the way the military, the spies, Farsight, Ed Dames, Daz Smith and Dick, or anybody else currently organizes a Remote Viewing project.

SPQRV does not have a "boss". It does not have "slaves". It has individuals who co-operate in order to get insights about their own futures.

So CB and fans, what do you think? Any quibbling that this is a bad idea? What's wrong with it?

Do you all want to hug your chains forever and blame your own mistakes on other people?

This way, the power and information gets spread evenly, and the people who get the data are the people that need it.

If I understand you correctly, I'm already working on this to a certain extent.

I'm planning a website where everybody can provide targets. The website assigns random target coordinates automatically, filling a pool of targets the viewers can select from. After a viewer provided his data, the target and the data the other viewers provided is revealed. That's the basic idea.

Well, the best bet is to keep each group pretty small - say 3 viewers and an organizer.

That way, each participant gets some data on what they want within a short period of time.

Including the organizer, who also views but doesn't know "Which" target is the going to be the one they are interested in.

I think it smart if the organizer doesn't select a task for themselves, but instead draws one at random from a pre-selected "own huge bag of sealed envelopes" trick.

And this way, if the organizer or one of the participants has a track record of good viewing, then everybody should get SOME nice sketches or maybe even 3D models of what they targeted.

The cute part is that it empowers each viewer. Especially in regards to how they can improve their own lives over the short-medium term future. :)

"That's not necessary."

I wasn't expecting EVERY RV project from this moment forwards using SPQRV tasking for every project. :) I am not that ambitious.

I was thinking more along the idea of a viewer both producing some blind data for other people, but ALSO getting the benefit of some blind data on their own "unknown futures" for them personally.

The idea being the exercise helping to build stronger viewers, especially in regards to meeting up potential future opportunities for positive developments. To them, personally.

It is not selfless, altruistic, but it is more of a social exercise hopefully leading to better stronger viewers.

Kind of an enhancer for participants as a whole, more so than regular tasker-viewer heirarchical viewing. Not so different it breaks rules, but different enough for viewers to grow a little with the tasking process.