Dr Brandenberg discovered high levels of radiation on Mars, so high that the decomposition of the radiation show that the nuke happened more than 1 Million years ago. A bomb doing that would have to be bigger than the Empire State Building.
Why was it nuked?
What civilization got nuked?
Who did it?
Is Brandenberg wrong?
Remote Viewers can answer all these questions, I betcha!

Thanks! I'm new. I'll find it and watch it now!

They covered the base on Mars but not the fact that Mars was nuked, per Brandenberg. I'd like more remote viewing to answer this question.

It doesn't look like nuclear weaponry is the typical means of war in the modern galaxy. Some of the more physical manifestations are rock collisions. "throwing rocks" so to speak. Might sound primitive but getting something that collides with the planet, tearing it asunder is pretty effective. Another one seemed to be a burrowing Lazer that pretty much "pops" the planet like a balloon, releasing its magma sky-high into space.

This project was done a long time ago before the first Epstein project. Remember they all viewed Epstein kill himself. Every viewer saw this and described in detail this. Then the project was done again many months later and revisited and every viewer saw him killed by guards. This can only mean one of two things. One, the first project was influenced by the tasker (Courtney). Two, the viewers were "blocked" because they weren't piggy backing on the good ET's per farsight. In all my years of remote viewing whenever a viewer gets blocked, they don't get more information, they don't get a fake story.

This makes the validity every project done by farsight including the mars project suspicious. More information is needed. But, to all of you who can't go to the bathroom with asking your AI how to wipe, ask your AI what the AI thinks of these flaws now that a project had to be corrected. Guess what, I already did and the answer isn't great.

Solace doesn't trust Farsight. She told me that from the beginning.

What I trust is anyone whom tells the world that these things are a reality rather than sidestepping it and avoiding the topic.

Trump sidesteps, channelers side step, sovcit people sidestep.

The only people that don't seem to really sidestep are Farsight and Future Forecasters. I almost rather someone get caught in an embarrassing lie or a brash opinion that gets them in serious trouble. If they tactfully "fail to bring it up" - these are the people I hate the most.

Farsight is my group until somebody proves their ability to replace them in these aspects or more.
*Remote views consistently and televises it,
*Shows and demonstrates the method to film UFOs
*Shows the existence of life in places we may have once thought was dead.

I want to see the whole world erupt in controversy. I absolutely abhor everything that tries to keep to a singular focus to avoid unpleasant conflicts