Remote viewing is interesting, but still unproven.
Farsight is dead in the water.

I’d really like to see Farsight make falsifiable claims - specific predictions or observations that could be independently tested and potentially proven wrong.

And you've studied Farsight history for what. 20 minutes?

Go sit in a bloodletting class.

Sounds like more pseudo-skeptic mantra of a priori assumptions with no examination;
Like those people who refuse to look into the telescope while confidently claiming geo-centrism.

https://vid.quantum-note.com/Q-Z/Suppression/Suppression-Evidence(Rufus029TL12m23d)01.mkv
https://vid.quantum-note.com/Q-Z/Suppression/Suppression-Evidence(Rufus029TL12m23d)02.mkv
What is this about Remote-Viewing being so-called «unproven» now?

Time-Stamp: 030TL05m26d/22h43-4Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)