Remote viewing is interesting, but still unproven.
Farsight is dead in the water.
I’d really like to see Farsight make falsifiable claims - specific predictions or observations that could be independently tested and potentially proven wrong.
Remote viewing is interesting, but still unproven.
Farsight is dead in the water.
I’d really like to see Farsight make falsifiable claims - specific predictions or observations that could be independently tested and potentially proven wrong.
And you've studied Farsight history for what. 20 minutes?
Go sit in a bloodletting class.
Sounds like more pseudo-skeptic mantra of a priori assumptions with no examination;
Like those people who refuse to look into the telescope while confidently claiming geo-centrism.
https://vid.quantum-note.com/Q-Z/Suppression/Suppression-Evidence(Rufus029TL12m23d)01.mkv
https://vid.quantum-note.com/Q-Z/Suppression/Suppression-Evidence(Rufus029TL12m23d)02.mkv
What is this about Remote-Viewing being so-called «unproven» now?
Time-Stamp: 030TL05m26d/22h43-4Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)