Quote @Aéius Cercle:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general-farsightprime-discussions/78688-falsifiable-claims#post-464101

"It's a Formless-Existence after all, but, then again... would Telepathy be considered... physical?"

We should come to terms about what "physical" actually means, because it gets really confusing when people talk about formless existence, non-physical dimensions, and stuff like that.

As far as I'm concerned, there is nothing in existence that is formless, except for what I call a "singularity", which is the only non-physical way of being.

This means that everything that is not a singularity, is a physical being or phenomenon.

For example, a radio wave is a physical phenomenon, because it has form. The form of the wave is interacting with other physical forms. The form is the reason why interaction is possible. You can even "touch" a radio wave. The fact that you don't feel anything if you touch it with your hand, for instance, doesn't mean that there's no interaction happening. It's just that the interaction doesn't result in changes that you can perceive. But if you use an antenna instead, attached to a radio device, you will get changes that you can perceive more easily.

The singularity on the other hand can't touch anything, because it has no dimensions.

The ISBE, at its core, is a singularity. This is the reason why ISBEs can't be killed. They are untouchable. But existing as a singularity alone doesn't make much sense (literally), because in that state, you can't touch anything. You have no effect in the physical world, regardless of the realm, plane, dimension, or however you would call it.

Every plane of existence is a physical plane from its perspective, because whatever is happening in that plane, has form.

So, in order to be able to have an effect inside a plane of existence, you have to have form. The ISBE therefore "projects" a form into the plane. It becomes physical, because being physical is the only way to do stuff. For example, what people call an "astral body" actually is a physical body on the astral plane.

But this comes with a downside: The physical form by definition is touchable, and this means it's destructible. One form can destroy another, by means of so-called destructive wave interference. This means that no form is built for eternity. It only lasts as long as the ISBE is able to maintain it.

This way of looking at physicality solves many problems, especially the problem of identification.

How do you identify a singularity? You can't. But a form, by its very nature, is always recognizable. An ISBE projects a reptilian body? Well, then it's a reptilian, of course.

This means that every target of remote viewing is a physical target – because you aren't looking at the formless. You want to see something, identify something. If this wasn't the case, you would end up with a blank paper.

In other words: Form is the reason why things happen. The source wants to express form. That's what it's all about.

Re: «The form is the reason why interaction is possible»

I don't know about that... I could easily communicate with the other formless-beings... telepathically.

I just no longer have those «connections» within this current restrictive human-form...

Time-Stamp: 030TL05m28d/12h22Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)

@Aéius Cercle:

"I could easily communicate with the other formless-beings... telepathically."

Good point. When I wrote the text, I used the word "interaction" in the sense of "causing physical change". Communication from one singularity to another doesn't necessarily cause physical change.

But: In most cases it actually does, when communication leads to emotion (vibration) and physical storage of memories.

Re: «when communication leads to emotion (vibration) and physical storage of memories.»

I am still not really sure about this since the formless-existence didn't actually feel physical.

However, it's difficult to «translate» the existence and experiences into... Earth-Life-Equivalent Metaphors because there really aren't any Earth-Life-Equivalent-Metaphors to really be able to describe that Existence-Type other than to just call it Formless.

Perhaps the closest «physical» approximation would be the existence of co-ordinates.

Co-ordinates certainly existed but everything there exists as something like pure-energy or maybe pure-light and, according to Ken, matter or solid-matter is just frozen-light... that guy runs this channel...

https://www.youtube.com/@KenTheoriaApophasis/

Time-Stamp: 030TL05m19h39Z

Vibration and physical storage of memories is only possible if there is form. The singularity can't "feel physical" on its own.

Here's an attempt of translation:

What I call the singularity, I also call the "God state" or "God consciousness". In that state, the ISBE doesn't look through eyes. It has no indirect sensory input. Instead, it senses its surroundings by going directly to the coordinates. And it can be at multiple coordinates at the same time, because without dimensions, it isn't bound to linear time.

It's not easy to get your head around if you are accustomed to linear sensory input. So here's an example:

Think of the singularity as a stone, and the physical universe as a body of water. When the ISBE "intersects" with the water, it's like throwing a stone that's causing waves. But the ISBE can throw multiple stones at once – which in physical terms means that the singularity moves faster than light. This causes multiples waves that interfere with each other. The points of interference are where matter is "frozen" – which we then call particles.

So, the ISBE, while throwing multiple stones at once, can "catch" the interfering waves. These interference patterns is what we sense as "touchable".

But it's still a little more complicated, because there is not one single ocean. There are multiple layers of ocean on top of each other. To understand this better, we can use our understanding of radio waves. There are multiple radio signals on top of each other, and the radio can pick one. It's essentially the same with physical reality.

This means that physical things can exist at the same spot if they exist in different layers of reality. For example, Harvey doesn't sit in the chair we see, or stand on the beach. He doesn't interact with our layer.

Now here's the interesting part: If you remote view, you aren't using your physical eyes. You don't even use your brain, at least not for the remote viewing part. Instead, your singularity – which is not bound to space and time – goes to the target. But this also means that you are making waves at the target. You are actually there, which is why other ISBEs can sense you.

For example, I wondered why the light up procedure works. It's because the singularity makes waves that correspond to a light that's becoming stronger. There is no physical equivalent, at least not in the same layer. But there is a change in energy, because you make waves in the ocean.

This also explains why telekinesis works. You make waves at the coordinates where another object already exists. Your singularity actually goes there, creates a wave pattern, and comes back without any time loss.

Lacerta also talks about this, but she uses different words. Quote:

"Imagine for yourself that all the matter here —you, this table, this pencil, this technical device, this paper— does not really exist, but that it is rather only the result of a field oscillation and a concentration of energy. All matter that you see, every creature, every planet and star in this universe, has an "information-energy equivalent" in the sphere of influence which is located on a main field —the general level {of things}. Now, there is not only one level, but several. Last time, I had mentioned that highly-developed species which is capable of changing levels (which is something completely different from the simple bubble changing, for bubbles are a part of each and every level). Do you understand? Dimensions, as you call them, are a part of a solitary bubble, bubbles or universal foam are a part of a level, and levels are layers in the sphere of influence, while the sphere of influence, acting in the capacity of single physical size, is essentially unending; it is composed of innumerable information-energy layers and general levels. There are in the sphere of influence no null-levels; all are the same, but they are separated by means of their energy conditions."

Is a creator a requirement?

@Entodude:

"Is a creator a requirement?"

A creator is a being that creates things. A creator is required if you believe that things can only exist if they are created.

I create so I am. You create so you are.

@Linda Bachop:

If an ISBE can't be killed, it can exist without creating things.

@Aéius Cercle:

Sounds like a valid remote viewing target. 😉

@Aéius Cercle:

"How in the world would a Remote-Viewer actually be able to depict such a target?"

Maybe it's not about depiction, but instead, a description of principles?

@Aéius Cercle:

"Not only that... exactly how would this target even be worded?"

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/78746-how-to-create-a-target