I think it's time to clarify how Natural Law works, as I see a lot of confusion about the difference between right and wrong, which leads to the inability to correctly distinguish between the free will ET's and the authoritarian ET's.

For example, the following claim in this thread, quote:

"This is an extremely important target because if enough countries sign this deal before the full disclosure event then we lose."

This is NOT TRUE.

If the ET's know anything about Natural Law, then they know that secret contracts are not binding because there is no informed consent. If a government signs any such contract, the people who don't know about it are not part of the contract. It's a natural law transgression to allege consent based on deception.

The authoritarian believe system is either based on direct enslavement through violence, or on indirect (mental) enslavement through deception. The latter feigns contracts through implied conduct.

If you don't understand what I mean, here's an example: Think of parents who command their kids to do the dishes. The kids are rebelling against the command by not reacting, so the parents say: "If you don't say a word, we'll take it as a yes."

The truth is, that in Natural Law, not saying a word is a No.

Nobody can say Yes to something not known. Contracts feigned this way are naturally illegal and therefore not binding.

ET's who don't know that are not free will ET's !!!

If you want to learn more about Natural Law, a good starting point is here:

https://onegreatworknetwork.com/mark-passio/mark-passio-the-science-of-natural-law

https://onegreatworknetwork.com/richard-grove/1-mark-passio-s-natural-law-seminar-natural-law-the-real-law-of-attraction-1-of-3-morning

Well, Hello Manuel,.....
In review of your comment I started to smile as I was anticipating some key words & ideas & YOu did not disappoint ! Well done and I am confident in your answer on premise & you understand the way "Natural LAW" works or should. . . . . . . . .but wait.
→ CONTRACTS CONSENTS AGREEMENTS COVENANTS PERMITS etc. is the thread that runs through history as far back as we can imagine or comprehend. No matter if it is VERBAL or in STONE, PAPER or DIGITAL PAPER lol it is binding. A human is only as righteous, or GOOD as their . . . . . . WORD !
oK so that said I take you back to what you SAID.
" It's a natural law transgression to allege consent based on deception." ← I understand this but I submit the following for thought.
If a people/group of HUMANS lets say ELECT others, as in other HUMANS to represent them which is giving them the POWER to act in their behalf when they enter into a CONTRACT what then? Because we have by default chosen to exist under LAWS by MAN or say HUMAN have we not?

So the point I am directing us to here is that I likely agree with everything you said, I absolutely stand with NATURAL/UNIVERSAL/GODS law GOLDEN rule even he he oR whatever one wants to name what we both agree is righteous position to engage other sentient HUMANS [or] BEINGS . But here is where the hmmmmmm I guess issue or weasel clause lays. Making sense, do you understand?

So I will stop here, kick it back to you for reply. I want to be clear, us to be clear so as we go forward in this war, make no mistake we are at WaR world wide against these things and it is paramount we are talking about them. Putting them into the PUBLIC DOMAIN for a REASON.

oK looking forward to reply Manuel. . . . . . . . .seriously.
/;^)
WeSaveUs
Do No Harm [unless a innocent]
AlwaysForward~Godspeed

It's the endless string of clauses that go back to, not coincidentally, the Egyptian days. When Courtney explained that a war took us away from ancient Egyptian life, suddenly a whole bunch of the weird freeman / sovereign stuff made way more sense.

Everywhere you see some reference to ancient egypt in our laws / codes / constructs whatever. Sure enough that is where you will find corruption and especially chicanery. Because everywhere they are trying to screw us, that is where they pay homage to their old Egyptian rule.

Do a lot of people from USA realize how goddamn weird it looks when you have all this weird Egyptian shit on your dollar bill? Sure enough you look at the bank notes that were quietly replaced with the greenbacks. Each note normally said "in exchange for 1oz gold" or something like that. Because paper money was not the real money. Just a promise note that when you take it to the bank you exchange it for metal aka real money. They never forced anyone into it. The masses just stupidly went "oh the words aren't there anymore, whatever, everything else looks the same"

Why is the one place allegedly in charge of the United States not even a state? It's the *District of Columbia* It has nothing to do with USA.

London the city has nothing to do with London aka New Westminster. It has another Egyptian obelisk, it's the *District of Columbia*. I bet you have a mom or a cousin or neighbor who's catholic. They sit racked with guilt about how they agreed in their baptism that this is their religion and god forbid if they excommunicate. The Vatican has nothing to do with Rome or Italy. It's the *District of Columbia*

This, I believe I understand now, are the Orions. They're not paying homage to the Egyptian gods. They *are* the Egyptian gods.

I think the way to handle it is much the way like you have to handle it when a spouse is so conflicted and yet desperately desiring a divorce. As disclosure begins, you realize not only has your partner been absolutely terrible to you but they've been cheating on you the entire time. And you go to the social worker and they give you the same damn line you always hear: "but, did you tell them at any point that you want to separate?" And then you think about the kids you share and what will your parents think, and what about that trust fund and was it really that bad?

Think about the lawyers and the doctors and the after school teacher they're all grumbling "oh my god I desperately want to help this person but I have no damn case until they make up their goddamn mind" and the confused spouse going "oh I'm such a victim. But nevermind I'm better to just go with it. "
oh but I'm such a victim. But nevermind I'm better to just go with it"

I bet you anything it's the perfect analogy for the human earthlings.

Informed consent.... we are all exhorted to go and vote - "If we don't vote, we are powerless and must accept the situation as it unfolds" kind of thing. On the contrary. If we vote, we not only give our endorsement to one or another puppet with only the merest hope that they will change things for the better, we also subscribe to the system and thus accept any puppet which emerges victorious. Get the puppets and their supporters squabbling and you can control the lot.

In UK law (from what little I know of the subject) states that a fraud uncovered renders null and void all contracts made under that fraud.

I cancelled my subscription to the system, preferring to govern and police myself. No-one owns me but me.