In the latest Farsight Weekly, 19 Sep 2024, Courtney describes the "chess game" that is going on right now, and it seems to boil down to a simple conclusion: Everybody wants war for different reasons, asap. Well, we already knew that, didn't we? But let's take a deeper look at the logic of the so-called good ETs.

The good ETs want to take advantage of the outbreak of war by showing up and saving the day, so to speak. But in order to be able to do that, they need to win the hearts of the masses first. When Courtney mentioned that, I thought: They are doing poorly, because who is still reaching the masses?

Just go on Youtube and look at the Starseed movement. For example, look how they are pushing a certain picture of the Pleiadians, always coming with beautiful pictures of beautiful people, sacred healing music, prophecies of ascension and so on. They look like shining angels coming to rescue us. And they push this narrative a lot, reaching a lot of people.

They are also pushing the narrative of the Pleiadians being the ones who are preventing nuclear disasters on Earth. Sounds familiar?

Now, here's what doesn't add up:

In the Operation Highjump project, Farsight saw these long haired human-like beings – who they called Pleiadians – cooperating with the Nazis in the base in Antarctica. In the second part, these Pleiadians fought a very unfair battle against the primitive US-american military force. They had fun shooting primitive people out of the sky! Courtney claims at the end that the Pleiadians changed their mind and want to help humanity now. Okay, could be true. But: How does he know?

Courtney doesn't explain why he knows that, so we have to assume that Farsight has viewed or contacted the Pleiadians. But we still don't know wether that's the case, because the ETs Farsight is in contact with just don't say who they are. They are just speaking, providing no proof for anything they say.

So, let's talk about proof...

Farsight looked into the reality of Harvey, seeing the ETs at the beach, the security people and all that. But for us normal people, they remain invisible. This is how Courtney explains it at timestamp 2:07:04 in the Reality of Harvey video:

"We have this chair here, so that he (Harvey) has some physical presence in the picture, but of course he's not actually sitting on the chair. He's got some other type of chair that he's, that we normally don't see on the camera, that he's actually sitting on in the same place. It is a little weird, I know. [...] It's a frequency thing, but anyway, it's complicated, and it is physics, but that's what it is."

So, let's take note: The good ETs can be invisible through some complicated frequency thing, let's call it phase shifting. They can't even be seen in infrared light, as Courtney proved in one of the videos. Now a quote of what Courtney said at timestamp 2:19 in the latest Farsight Weekly video:

"We have even been showing people how to make video recordings of the ET ships on demand, using modified cameras that can record in infrared and at 120 frames per second. Now this circumvents their stealth technology, and all this should be convincing to many..."

It's not convincing if you try to put 2 and 2 together:

1. The stealth tech of the bad ETs can be circumvented easily with 2022 smartphone technology and an infrared filter.

2. The stealth tech of the good ETs can't be circumvented that easily, they are literally untouchable, not moving the sand when they stand on the beach, having their own chair that must be standing on an entirely different planet and so on.

So, the good ETs can phase shift into non-physicality, but the bad ETs can't do the same thing, because if they could, they would do it to prevent humans filming them with smartphones in order to keep secrecy intact. At least since 2022, but actually earlier, because they are not that stupid to not see 4K smartphones coming. And they still can be filmed today.

Why are they not hiding? It would only make sense if they can't phase shift like the good ETs, but if that was the case, why do the good ETs need security at all? They should be untouchable to the bad ETs just like they are to us.

It doesn't add up.

So, let's change the premises. The good ETs are not phase shifting, but instead communicating telepathically over a greater distance, which would be much safer. The problem with that is: They still wouldn't need security, and the Reality of Harvey remote viewing would be false, because the ETs wouldn't be there.

Okay, let's assume that the bad ETs are capable of phase shifting. Why can we film them? Do they want us to see them? And why would they want that?

And how do the Pleiadians fit into the picture?

Farsight and the so-called good ETs need to provide answers to these questions if they want to be convincing. If this is ignored, we would have to assume that the ETs Farsight is in contact with don't have good intentions, and that means that the remote viewing can't be trusted either, as the ETs provide "support" for the viewers.

I'm looking forward to the next board meeting.

Regarding the last part: Can't be (fully) trusted. You can trust some of it, if not most of it.

Every good disinformation agent knows that disinformation only works when you mix in the disinformation with 99% truth. That way the receiver will trust the source and won't be able to find out which part is disinformation. Poisoning the well - basic espionage 101.

I would just be cautious of what gets deemed as logic. Logicians have a strong consensus that you can't assume apriori ("logic") from aposteriori (experience) - any phrase "we must assume that" is immediately challenged with asking "why or why not". Alternatively, when we state things like "*if* we assume that . . . " then we can draw some conclusions - but those conclusions are never irrefutable.

Another way for me to say what I am saying -

Farsight deserves to be examined with a fine properly skeptical microscope. If we follow the Farsight premise - they knew they were coming to try to save a screwed up planet scoured with hellish lies. So they shouldn't be troubled by our rise of questioning.

So many things are uncertain. For example: I think the thing about the pleiadians, if this name was ever brought up I believe it was a deduction by one of the remote viewers (and really, the word "deduction" seems like a really poor choice to describe what that process is in rv. I don't know why they couldn't have just stuck with "aol")

I think this original post is quite insightful so I'm going to read over it again, but I wanted to speak into the logic factor.

Ok, looking over original post more closely, it matches some of the questions I've raised in the past. Here's some things I would say now, in continuing this line.

*Why chairs. I mean really. I get the placeholder thing. You want to approximate their location with a physical thing. Regardless of whether it's truth or lies, empty chair it's just so . . . mmmm . . . so 80s tacky. Like why not go all out. Put some silly bear (especially a periwinkle coloured one) it's just . . . lol you guys it's so silly!! Why not like a couple of nice sleek pylons or those ribbon guards they use at movie theaters, use that to represent the phase-shifted space they occupy.

*Why say "oh you need to go through the process of discovery" when it comes to trying to tracking them. Like how about gamna rays. Would a gamma ray detector confirm some sort of geometric solidity to Harvey et all? Why not a simple yes or no to that?

I wonder if the good ET/bad ET routine is similar to the good cop/bad cop routine, considering this IS a so called prison planet.

Consider the possibility that earth may be a private, for profit prison, interested in ROI (return on investment) rather than a government prison with an interest in reducing the number of inmates and eliminating the need for a prison in the first place.

"I wonder if the good ET/bad ET routine is similar to the good cop/bad cop routine, considering this IS a so called prison planet."

That's a very important point. There is no proof as of yet that the ETs who Farsight calls "good" are actually good.

"It's based on the one side being the "right" side.... authoritarian tyrannical and nationalist and the other being the "left hand path" or the false light/fake light of Lucifer whereby it thinks it knows what's best for you and therefore will force it on you."

That's the dialectics of left vs right, which in reality has nothing to do with good vs bad in a moral sense. Left and right in a political sense are both bad, because both sides are authoritarian, meaning they are based in the false belief that a government has the right to rule over people. That right doesn't exist in nature.

"and they think they can just put out whatever dumb propaganda message they want and we will just believe, believe, believe... Such sillyness"

Many people believe silly stuff, just like children. They put it out because it works. The problem is: People who believe that silly stuff are easy to manipulate, just like children. The bad guys will always try to benefit from gullibility, because it's an easy win if no one is protecting the children.

"the "angelic" looking ones are actually more so the demonic ones if anything."

That's a possibility with a high probability. That's why we have to discern based on what they are doing, not how they look and what they are saying. We have to ask as many questions as possible – because bad people don't like reason and evidence, they want you to not question them.

"In this inverted world"

It's not the world that is inverted – it's the people.

"The good ETs want to take advantage of the outbreak of war by showing up and saving the day, so to speak. But in order to be able to do that, they need to win the hearts of the masses first. When Courtney mentioned that, I thought: They are doing poorly, because who is still reaching the masses?"

After watching the following interview, I'm under the impression that the "good ETs" never intended to win the hearts of the masses before disclosure. I think the winning of the masses will start after catastrophic disclosure has happened, so it will be very important for us to vet them. We'll see...

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/70381-conflict-radio-interview-with-courtney-brown

"Why are they not hiding? It would only make sense if they can't phase shift like the good ETs, but if that was the case, why do the good ETs need security at all?"

I'm still thinking about this. The interesting question is: When standing on the beach, armed to the teeth, who are they expecting to fight against? The strategy of the bad ETs, meaning the ones running the prison planet, is to use human military to do the dirty work. So, the security is not needed against the bad ETs, because if they chose to attack, the hot war breaks out. Instead, the security seems to be needed against human attackers.

This begs the question: Are human military forces able to phase shift? If not, the only reason for security would be to protect Courtney.

There's still the possibility that I don't get how the phase shifting works and therefore are unable to come to the right conclusions.

Hey are these prison planet traps in another dimension I’m guessing? If that’s the case it’s the ETs who will have to destroy because we can never see them. So why don’t they? Or message us about them in crop circle, has to be somewhere safe on the planet could leave a message. Or even broadcast in Morse code from safety of ship

@Tazz regarding your deleted post:

"I mean you might as well say it's true if you believe it, but using the above adjectives won't really do much I think."

You need to define those words in order to be able to use them without being confused. The problem is: Most people haven't defined basic terms, they are just using them because everybody does, or to provoke an emotional reaction due to mental overload. Doesn't mean they know what they're talking about.

I have clear definitions of the terms I'm using. If you want to know, just ask.

Another lively discussion; I think I will just throw in another one into the mix here... according to the Cross-Correspondences, thanks to Frederick William Henry Myers, this very «universe» itself ISN'T REAL, even though the «experiences» and what you «experience» within it IS real...

Here's another question regarding the Reality of Harvey project:

The viewers see Courtney and Harvey, they see the beach, the chairs, the ships, the entourage, the stuff the entourage is carrying – but they don't see the camera equipment that has been used to record the meeting.

Why is that?

If these extraterrestrial beings are indeed advanced, it’s logical to assume that they are fully aware of the doubts they will raise among humans. Being technologically and intellectually superior means they understand human nature, which is naturally inclined to question and scrutinize anything unfamiliar or mysterious. They would surely recognize the risk involved in any interaction with us, knowing that we will analyze their intentions and measure their actions against our own ethical and cognitive frameworks.

In this context, if their intentions are genuinely positive, they would likely take clear steps to build trust. They might try to demonstrate their intentions through tangible actions that leave no room for doubt or by providing verifiable evidence of their sincerity. Advanced beings would not just showcase their impressive technologies or capabilities, but would also work to prove that they are not seeking to exploit humanity, but rather to offer genuine support.

On the other hand, if their goal is manipulation or control, they would understand that dealing with humans through ambiguity and deceit is a double-edged sword. Sowing doubt could lead to inevitable confrontation, as any being or group of beings that recognizes the risks would also account for human resistance or unpredictable reactions. This suggests that even if they have malevolent intentions, they might develop more precise methods of manipulation or pacification before revealing their true objectives.

In the end, knowing that humans will question everything may prompt them to act more intelligently in their interactions with us, whether by enhancing transparency or deepening the mystery.

"In this context, if their intentions are genuinely positive, they would likely take clear steps to build trust."

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71637-zombie-disclosure