The forum user Lindsay Druschel wrote in another thread:
"But I do worry still that our government officials will then be tricked by the bad ETs to sign another agreement & the good ETs will leave. It’s all very concerning & overwhelming to think about. "
So, let's talk about this little piece of information that says: If you choose the wrong side, the good ETs will leave.
Are they really good if they leave when governments are tricked into signing another agreement with the bad ETs?
Because, good people know that the government doesn't represent all of the people, and they know that a contract without informed consent is void.
So, when someone is telling us that the good ETs will leave, that sounds to me like a disinfo psy-op to instill hopelessness and despair. That's not what good people would do. Good people would stand by your side even in the darkest times.
Precisely. It would be different if they concluded that our decision was to oppose them collectively, by majority, by our own free will. But coercive "contracts" are not free will, they're not contracts at all.
I don't mind "negative". Face it, there are negative things. I despise trying to avoid what's negative just to avoid the unpleasant. But in this case, how is some secret military contract valid by any stretch other than basically a criminal pact.