Suppose that Bob were to testify in court on either of the 2 scenarios

*Bob is the defendant against a lawsuit for damages of failure to oay and breach of contract (such as a mortgage or bill left unpaid)

OR

*Bob were to sue an organization for damages in that they've harassed and arrested Bob, seized his property without due process.

AND

Bob calls a witness to the stand.

Bob states that his Nation is the Galactic Federation, and as a result, the seizure of property has no jurisdiction over Bob, or the plaintiff has no jurisdiction over Bob

*****

Would someone, anyone, willingly take the stand as a witness as a representative of the Galactic federation?

Interesting input so far, thanks

"Bob states that his Nation is the Galactic Federation, and as a result, the seizure of property has no jurisdiction over Bob, or the plaintiff has no jurisdiction over Bob"

The seizure of property is always wrong, because seizure means that it's not you who owns the property, but the authority. If you believe that an authority has the right to take your property away, it's actually you renouncing your property right.

"Legal systems do not entertain claims of intergalactic or fictional entities with no grounding in existing law."

In other words: The court doesn't have a contract with the Galactic Federation, but you bow down to the judge nonetheless, so why should he care?

This means: You will only have a chance, if...

1. you're defending yourself against seizure (theft), and
2. the court respects or fears your nation.

So I didn't think too much about this scenario when I first put it out but I now have an idea how it could play out.

First off, let me volunteer that I will testify for anyone as a representative of the Galactic Federation, and enter as a witness, with the provision of paid travel and (cheap) lodging (eg: rent me a car to sleep in). I'd take the time off work as a donation.

Now I would create multiple tasks related to the court case (kangaroo court or not) and rely *solely* on certified remote viewers and their data, particularly any responses they receive from subjects relevant to the matter.

So I would gather this data and present it as evidence for the court.

. . . Now . . . The court has an interesting dilemma,

First, everything said there becomes case law. So that's minefield number 1

Second, the unique case would garner a lot of attention. Even skeptics wanting to laugh at this "lunatic bound to fail" and after a bit of public campaigning it wouldn't be long before there's a bit of media attention (get all those A1 audit guys, they would eat this)

So: if the court wants to challenge the certificates, they have to go after the individuals as incompetent or illegitimate, but such is the responsibility when you operate by a certificate.

Alternatively, they could argue that the whole institute is illegitimate. . . and that raises the "clean, defendable" aspects of SRV.

I don't see any disclaimers that this is for entertainment purposes only.

Do the powers that be really want to open this can of worms?

Or would they quietly just give Bob whatever he wants?

"Yes through Remote Viewing data"

That's not valid. Even Farsight admits it at the end of each video:

All remote viewing data must be considered speculative until the data are confirmed by reliably obtained physical evidence.

So, the judge would ask for physical evidence, and if you don't have it, the conversation ends.

Yes to physical evidence. Physical evidence is UAP matching the remote viewing data predictions. 😄

Okay, so there's a remote viewer testifying in court. He presents his data about the Galactic Federation, and then the judge asks... let me write it as a dialog:

Judge: Where's the evidence that backs your data?

Viewer: Here's another session where I viewed UAPs, and what I saw matches the video data.

Judge: That's impressive, but how do I know wether you tell the truth regarding the sessions that are lacking evidence?

All I know in relation to the case is that multiple viewers were tasked separately, blindly, and were in contact with someone from the Galactic Federation whom gives consent for Bob to be a member.

Meanwhile, Bob sues the organization that is attempting to sue Bob or seized Bob's property (which is ultimately an LLC of some kind), and he provides evidence that the LLC is operating falsely as a US citizen, and US citizens don't exist as it would have been created through the 14th amendment but Congress states that the 14A was never ratified.

You're still stuck in the "man-made law is binding" fallacy.

If you create an organization, and you tell people it's a republic, the people who become members of that organization are members of a republic. It's called an "implied-in-fact contract". If the organization doesn't act like a republic, the simple truth is that its members are delusional about their own organization. And I can explain to you the nature of the delusion:

Every government, without exception, is an LLC in principle. LLC means Limited Liability Company. A company is just an organization. If you have more than one person, it's a company (because they accept each others company). Limited Liability means to hand over the responsibility each person has by nature to the leaders of the company. That's exactly what a government is.

Let me tell you: If the Galactic Federation works the same way, it's also just an LLC.

So, US citizens exist because they claim they are US citizens AND their company validates their claim.

In the same way, if you claim to be a citizen of the Galactic Federation, that company must validate the claim, which means it has to provide physical evidence of your citizenship. Remote viewing data without evidence means nothing, because from the judge's point of view, it's just hearsay.

It is the other way round: If ETs come to Earth, then they are under Earth's Law. Bob is under earth's law, too. ETs would be under International law if they come as diplomats. Otherwise the laws of the country would be applicable, or space law, aviation law, sea law, if not in a national border. It would be to decide by the entered state/country how to deal with this -visa, permissions, person v.s object, etc.
The UN may decide to join the GF and accept Galactic Law as superior, this has not been done, as far as I know.

Contact With Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Human Law: The Applicability of Rules of War and Human Rights
Bohlander, Michael

Rechtsfragen beim Kontakt mit Extraterrestrischen: Völkerrecht, Wirtschaft und Politik - ein Gedankenmodell (In German - Legal issues in contact with extraterrestrials: International law, economics and politics - a thought model)
Klaus Stähle
Video in German:
(

Bob is under the law he of the Nation lives in, he cannot even go to an international court, as this can only do nations.
If the national courts and authorities do not respect GF-Law, he (de facto) has no chance to get a positive response to his claim.

If there is a "Galactic Meta Law" the UN (or EU if app.) could decide to join it and the Nations (e.g. via their parliaments) would need to ratify it and then would have to put it into their own legal framework to be applicable to Bob.
Bob would need a lot of time, a very good lawyer and a lot of money to go through all the instances up to the high court, even if he has really good evidence that GF law exists. No low-level judge would want to decide on such a thing, but would send him right to next level. And I don't mean RV as evidence, this is hearsay -at best. He would need several confirmed ET diplomats and ET lawyers coming physically to the courtroom and to testify for him.

ETs can also be held liable for damages they do under Earth law.

"It is the other way round: If ETs come to Earth, then they are under Earth's Law."

There is no Earth's law. There is only universal law. Every being has the same rights in the whole universe, based on self-ownership. It doesn't matter where you are. Here's a telegram voice message where I explain it in German:

➡️ https://t.me/moralische_anarchie/415

But if the ETs believe the nonsense of so called "legal spheres", they will either subjugate themselves under the law of where they are, or they will try to implement their own legal sphere through violence and manipulation. Everybody who does that cannot be considered good, because "legal sphere" means: You don't own yourself – the authority owns you.

And as long as Bob cannot bring any "certificate" which is issued by an authority the court has to respect, like from another lawful authority, this would be worth nothing.
In this case I would recommend Bob to fly under the radar and to do not waste his energy on a fight he cannot win.

Just so you know, a Scenario like this has already happened before, except it's not Hypothetical, but, was a case of Terence Malaher versus the State of Tasmania. The details are documented starting here... http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/godslaw1.htm#Section%20-%201

Terence had written much of what he personally experienced (most although not all of his letters managed to be preserved by him for the «record» for the rest of us to be able to read) when dealing with the «systems men» (government «officials») of Tasmania where they had subjected him to over five years imprisonment, threatened him with even more fines and penalties, kidnapped him literally from his own home, forced him into a very long drive into the back of their kidnappers' vehicles while all tied up & hand-cuffed, despite the fact that he was a frail old man of 70 years old, and, all for what reason ? ALL because of his REFUSAL to pay for a 15$AU Driver's License Renewal-Fee.

NOW do you people finally come to the understanding of why I am able to respect this guy ? He simply REFUSED TO GIVE IN TO EXTORTION and wouldn't even go so far as to budge an «inch» at their attempts to try to FORCE him to «pay» SOMETHING... ANYTHING ! «Oh, you won't pay up ?» they say ? «Alright, then jail time and more "fines" for you, old geezer !» they continued (for YEARS).

The «version» of «The Galactic Federation» that Terence had brought with him can be «read» here in this lettre to a constable wherein Terence stated the «reason(s)» for his own Diplomatic-Immunity...
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/offend8.htm#page%2016

Now that you have more «fuel» (with something that has actually happened and is not merely hypothetical) with which to add and probe into this scenario you can better-predict that the whole entire damn «system» here of Caesar-style court-systems is really just another part of the control-grid.