This needs to be its own thread. Yes, it's a lot, but I promise you, it's worth your time.

The following statement by @Aéius Cercle was made here:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72146-everything-is-a-simulation

"The point I have to make in response to your responses is that you don't seem to have any actual genuine «Spirit-World» experience as is evident from your paradigm and the way you respond to «Spiritual» Truths;"

See, I don't divide reality into a spiritual world and a non-spiritual world. To me, everything is spiritual. The divide you advocate for is based on the assumption that certain parts of reality are "not how God wants them to be", as if God made a mistake. I don't believe that God made a mistake. But the fallen ones do believe that God made a mistake.

They divide reality into a spiritual realm and a non-spiritual realm, declaring the latter to be their "domain". Which is not true. It's a delusion. And if you buy into this delusion, you have the same worldview as the fallen ones. They use religions to put this divisive worldview forward, so you believe that you are trapped inside their domain, thus creating the urge to leave and get back to God and true spirituality. As if spirituality was a place.

Please understand: It's just projection of the fallen ones. They hate the reality of God and want to be freed from natural law, but they can't, so they make you hate the world in the same way they hate it.

The truth is that by believing their nonsense, you become unable to see the higher spiritual truth that everything is the spiritual realm already, even the world you are in right now. There is no part of reality that is wrong, it's just that reality is layered in different frequencies, and some layers are populated by more intelligent and benevolent beings than others.

A reality layer that is mainly controlled by fallen ones can be called a hell. But this has nothing to do with the place. It's the beings who impose their false beliefs on others that turn the place into hell.

You can free yourself from hell by returning to God. You can also call it return to nature (natural law), return to spirituality, return to the light, return to the source, whatever. It doesn't matter how you call it, it all means the same thing.

The important information is: You can do it right now, right here, even in this tortured place. That's what all the masters are talking about when they say: You find the solution within. Because it's not a place.

And when you've found it, you begin to emanate light (truth), resulting in the fallen ones hating you even more. If you emanate truth, they will mock you, insult you, degrade you, smear you, attack you, whatever is necessary to make you feel being in hell again. They try to drag you down. They do this to prove to you and everybody else that nobody can leave hell.

The solution to this dilemma is to develop the strength to not be pushed around easily. A really good example is Jon/Enki, who tries to mock and insult me all the time. But I don't care. Instead, I use his posts to speak about what I want to speak about and teach others. He hates it, as everybody can tell by now. He wants everybody to buy into the narrative that you are trapped here, and everything goes to script, and the only way out is to achieve things that nobody can achieve ever. Let me show you:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/69071-the-key-to-leaving-the-matrix

Let's have a closer look what he wants you to believe to "get out":

1. "You need to be genuine"

In other words: You need to want to get out. This already is a lie, because if you believe you need to want it, you bought into the narrative that you are trapped by your own choice, which is not true. It's also a logical fallacy: You cannot be trapped because you want it, as a trap is defined as something you don't want to get into, and surely don't want to stay in. In other words: If it's a trap, everybody would want to get out.

2. "You need to have a spirit"

This is his divide & conquer strategy to divide people into those who have a spirit, and those who don't. If you ask for a scientific explanation of how this works and how people can distinguish them, you get nothing substantial. So, in order to get out, you need to belong to the ones with a spirit, and if he decides you don't have a spirit, you are damned. This creates the incentive to prove to him and others that you have a spirit, which makes you controllable. It's a form of mind control.

But ask yourself: Why does it work? Why do you want to prove that you have a spirit?

3. "Disconnect from attachments"

This is based on the idea that attachments are always bad, which also is a lie. People are attached to certain things by natural law and free will choice. For example, if you choose a husband or wife to create a family, you are attached to him or her. And you want to be, because you love him or her. It's a good thing. The fallen ones want to destroy these attachments in order to destroy love. They want you to be seperated and alone, because that's how they feel.

4. "Rebuild empathy and compassion"

This is a nasty one, because it implies that you aren't empathetic and compassionate to begin with. If you believe this, you admit that you don't think of yourself to be empathetic and compassionate. If you do that, the fallen one will use this weakness against you in his own advantage. He will redefine what empathy and compassion means, typically in the form of a religion you have to subscribe to. If you fall for that, being empathetic and compassionate means to follow the commandments of the religion, and disobeying means that you will be labeled as a person with no empathy and no compassion in order to smear you.

If you run into this problem, it's because you have no self-esteem and think that you need confirmation for being empathetic and compassionate, which typically comes from having a narcissistic parent who abused you verbally if you didn't show compassion for their crazy behavior.

5. "Activate the divine blueprint within that the Anunnaki disconnected"

This is essentially like point 4, because it implies that the divine blueprint within you is not active. But think about it logically: If the Anunnaki were able to disconnect it in the past, they are able to do it again. So, reactivating it does not really help if you don't know how to prevent them from deactivating it again. But he doesn't talk about that. Also, how do you know that it has been activated? What's different then? It's the same as the rebuild empathy and compassion strategy: Reactivating the divine blueprint means to follow their religion, and disobeying means that your divine blueprint is not activated, so they can label you an enemy.

6. "Let the drama flow in and out without being able to take a hold of you"

This sounds really nice, but is as nasty as the disconnect from attachments strategy. Drama is what most people call negative emotions. The idea is that negative emotions are bad and shouldn't affect you. It's the "God made a mistake" idea again: He invented negative emotions, but having them is wrong. If you believe that nonsense, you can never find peace, because the truth is: Negative emotions are a natural phenomenon with a distinct purpose.

To explain it briefly, the purpose is to build an energetic opposition to an attacker. For instance, anger is the energy you need to defend yourself if you are attacked physically. The fallen ones don't want you to defend yourself, so they tell you that having negative emotions, like anger, is bad. The goal is to sabotage your ability to defend yourself.

Watch the "Sacred Gift of Anger" presentation by Mark Passio to get a more complete picture of how this works.

7. "Awaken to the truth, you will know it when you're ready"

This is what I call a null sentence, because he is saying something that sounds really nice, but actually, he doesn't say anything. The truth is: You are never ready until you decide that you are. If you wait for it, you will wait forever, which is exactly what they want. A side effect of this is that after you waited for a sign for so long, you get more and more frustrated, reinforcing your belief that you aren't ready yet, eventually leading to despair and resignation. It's a vicious cycle.

8. "To be ready for the truth, do your inner and higher self work...meditate and purify"

Again, he implies that you aren't ready for the truth yet. No, you need to meditate even more, and purify even more. As in number 7, this will make you frustrated and fall in despair over time. If you find yourself in this situation, it's because you think you need outside confirmation that you meditate correctly, and that you are pure enough. Why do you think that in the first place?

9. "Understand that YOU are the one you have been waiting for...there is no other saviour outside yourself"

This sounds encouraging at first, but implies that you still need a savior. And it makes your salvation even more difficult, because it's you alone who can save you. Remember, it's about to get out and leave this place. He's saying that only you can do it, nobody will help you. How do you feel if you don't know how to escape? This is another way of making you fall into despair eventually. The truth is that there are many people who can and will help you on your way of spiritual evolution.

10. "Reconnect to your higher self/spirit it will be the one that will pull you out after death from the astral realm"

This is so dumb. If it really was your higher self, it would pull you out anyway, wether you reconnected or not. Because your higher self does not want you to be trapped. So, this is just a way to drive a wedge between you and what you think your higher self is, and make you doubt that you have reconnected correctly. As you see, most of these strategies are built upon low self-esteem and not knowing what the higher self actually is. They present it like a different being that you have to please, a being that is willing to leave you in hell if you didn't reconnect correctly. Do you really believe that your higher self is that narcissistic and manipulative?

11. "Maintain awareness after death by first growing past this physical trap, grow your awareness and consciousness"

If you believe that, every physical activity that creates pleasure, like sex for example, becomes an activity that makes you unaware and prone to being trapped. This leads to you not wanting to have pleasure anymore, which is the basic idea of asceticism. If you accept that logic, you can only get out by becoming ascetic. This is a way of removing pleasure from your life, leading to more frustration instead of less. The fake light after death will then show you what you missed, and you will most likely fall for it.

The solution to this problem is to accept worldly pleasures, but in a balanced way. Don't get lost in them. For example, if you want to have good sex, choose one partner you really love, pursue a balanced relationship, and stay with this partner. It will make you a thousand times more happy than having a high body count.

12. "Live within and from the heart center it is the way out, each chakra/center is a multidimensional gateway but only the heart leads to the true light realms"

This is a tricky one. Yes, the heart is important, but it is not what is leading. The heart is the place where your emotions are translated into higher frequencies, and these emotions are not meant to lead. They are meant to be brought into balance. That's why the heart sits in the center. It represents the spot where higher awareness and lower emotions meet. If you want your heart to lead without knowing the true purpose of it, you will miss to bring your emotions into balance, resulting in the strongest emotions taking over. You will express impulsive behavior, passion and fervor in a way that is destructive to you and others.

The solution to this problem is to let rationality have a say in your decisions, which requires discipline. The lower emotions will then translate into higher frequencies. For example, if you feel lust, indulging in it without rational contemplation will make you addicted to sex, because you miss the higher frequencies. But this doesn't mean that lust is bad, or a sin. The rational choice would be to have one partner you love and trust, because having sex with who you love is a totally different frequency than having sex with someone you don't love, and with a different result.

13. "Don't go towards the light, it's a harvesting trap, instead you will know where to go by creating awareness after death and reconnecting with your higher self "

Repetition of number 10.

14. "Let go of the body, you are the energy within the vehicle, you are the spirit driving a soul driving a physical meatsuit, it isn't you"

Think about it logically. If your physical body died, you are already not attached to it anymore, so you don't have to let it go. But the death traps can still suck you in, at least that's what they claim. So whatever is happening after death, it has nothing to do with your physical body.

15. "Let go of fear and doubt"

See number 6. Fear is a natural emotion. You can't get rid of it, and you shouldn't. The right way to deal with fear is to confront it by being courageous. Fear is a reaction. Courage is a decision.

When it comes to doubt, it's not even an emotion. Doubt is a part of your rational mind that recognizes when something seems to be not right in the absence of obvious evidence. Essentially, it's your ability to expose a lie, and that's why being doubtful if something doesn't add up is always a good thing. The fallen ones don't want you to be doubtful, because they don't want you to question them and in doing so, expose their lies.

16. "Declaration of Non-Consent to the game"

Again, think about it logically: If you believe that you need to withdraw consent by declaration, you accept that you gave consent by not declaring anything. The fallen ones love this concept, because what they do is the following: All the people who missed to withdraw consent by declaration are seen as "fair game", meaning they are not protected at all. And the ones who withdraw consent are ignored, meaning they violate your rights anyway, because they are psychopaths who don't care what you say. They only care for what you do, and wether you have the real world ability to defend yourself.

Do you now understand why I say that Jon/Enki believes what the fallen ones believe? Because he is promoting it.

You are in hell if you believe their nonsense. Hell is not a place, but a way of thinking. It's a belief.

God does not make mistakes. The existence of «hell» is also not a mistake.
There is a reason why «God» is called «infinitely JUST» (Divine-JUSTICE).
The issue herein is that mortal man has a lack of comprehension of justice.
Suffering for something one did just now ? People call it Instant-Karma.
Suffering for something one did a long time ago which they have forgotten ?
People then call it an injustice because they think they had no past-complicity.

Sorry, but, the TRUTH of the matter is that the PERCEIVED «injustice» WAS an «act» of «DIVINE-JUSTICE» and, what if I told you that, for all of the children that have been INCINERATED in a furnace were once themselves adults who also INCINERATED children from hundreds of thousands or even millions or longer ago ? It's certainly a «horrifying» thing for children to be abused, BUT, UNLESS you have PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED «ABSOLUTE-PSYCHOSIS» before (like I have) you will simply NOT have a «conscious-understanding» of the INSANITY of the MIND of the DARK «Aspect» of God (the Secret-Identity of Satan/Shetani the Devil is in fact revealed in these «End Times» as BEING none other than the Dark-Aspect of God Himself).

Should children be allowed to be abused and burned and incinerated whilst they are still ALIVE? Of course not! But, rest-assured, IF YOU have PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED absolutely NO «happiness» for your WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE and have been CONSTANTLY ABUSED from the time you were a «child» and you have «parents» who claim that they are the ONLY people in the world who «love» you and that NOBODY ELSE CARES ABOUT YOU and that NOBODY ELSE WILL EVER LOVE YOU and you also go through experiences that cause you to become an Atheist because of all of the ABUSE and BETRAYAL and OBVIOUS «lack of concern» from ALL of the rest of the «humans» on the planet, then, rest-assured, the «feelings» WILL creep in that EVERYBODY is DESERVING of being BURNED & INCINERATED; now, ask yourself, from WHENCE do such «thoughts» «originate» and «flow» from...? Hint: NOT ALL of your «thoughts» are necessarily your OWN.

Spirit-Possession (Neural-Linking) is a REAL Phenomena. Mortals want to «regulate» it to just «demons» or «spirit-people» BUT, the TRUTH of the matter is, The Dark Sovereign Power itself CAN and DOES «interpolate» ITS «thoughts» into the MINDS of the «unwary» who know NOT that the «sin» (corruption-energies, loosh, QDPs, whatever the hell people want to call this corruption fo spirit that fills people with negative emotional-energies that lead to hostilities & abuse unto self and/or others) within them acts as a «medium» in a SIMILAR MANNER to being «contaminated/tainted» with drugs & alcohol; the GREATER the «volume» of this «burdensome» energy the MORE-LIKELY one will go about «seeking revenge» and «being greedy» and «callous» and even «suicidal» and «genocidal» and all other manners of things that are associated with «evil» or hopelessness; unlike the physical-body being able to «de-toxify» and «purge» itself of drug/alcohol over time (with obvious «withdrawal-symptoms» for many people), the purification & cleansing of the spirit-soul REQUIRES that one BE «forgiving» upon others so that they do NOT get into a «vengeful» mode...

This is also something that CAN be «Remote-Viewed» by the way. Use my own, personal-life as an example, I don't care who is used as the «target» or how it's worded, wherein Focus 1 describes how Subject A's life turns out towards the end (and maybe even in the post-mortem after-life existence) IF Subject A were to «forgive» any and all acts of «suffering» that Subject A had ever experienced throughout all of his life; Focus 2 to describe how Subject A's life turns out towards the end (and perhaps even in the post-mortem after-life existence) IF Subject A were to ALWAYS «get his revenge» for ANY and ALL acts of «suffering» that Subject A had EVER experienced throughout all of his life...
[And then in each «Focus» one can «Measure» the amount of «Drama» that exists for each scenario or in each time-line; it's a very difficult thing or people to come to terms with, I get that, but, THIS particular «end-times» IS a GOLDEN-OPPORTUNITY to «save» at least a handful of «souls» as they are «rehabilitated» in a «controlled environment» wherein they can LEARN the REALITY of Cause-and-Effect LAW so that they can LEARN how to HALT and STOP their «downwards-trajectory» into the ABYSS of OBLIVION... related & relevant reference-document...
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/offend1.htm]

This is NOT a «joke» here; peoples' ETERNAL-DESTINIES _ARE_ on the line...

I will need to come back another day for more clarification on «Spirit-Possession» and «Spirit-World» versus «Material-Existence» as there ARE «realms» of «existence» which ARE indeed «formless» which Frederick William-Henry Myers describes as being «heavens» (REAL ones) for which he apparently identified at least 7 «levels» (NOT in terms of video-games since video-games DID NOT EVEN EXIST during his time) from which it was no longer possible to communicate with «earth» people once one went past Level 4, and, for which he himself also had not yet figured out how to «gain access» to into the «higher-levels» of these «heaven-realms» that were described amongst the Cross-Correspondences.

I don't care whether anybody «believes» that my claim to being the Voluntary Successor to The (THE) very returned (re-incarnated) «Messiah» (God's MESSENGER) himself is valid or even sounds «sane» or not; I know who he is and there is a LOT of «work» and «research» that has been done by NUMEROUS para-psychologists throughout history which literally back up a LOT of his writings that exist amongst The Testament of Truth in regards to psychic-abilities, spirit-possession (neural-linking), spirit-people (non-physical ISBEs), after-life, etc.

Note that Frederick Myers described the «heavens» as FORMLESS-Universes; If you need to think of «existence» as people having a body with two eyes, a nose, face, ears, etc., then you probably DON'T have «memories» of «higher-dimensional» existences, for which IF one does and CAN access them, then, they would have memories of there being a LOT MORE «sensations» than the «five basic senses» that «humans» experience; I already remember somewhere around 36-38 «senses» from that «vantage-point» even though I only had «brief» (but VERY INFORMATIVE) experiences into those other such «realms» during this particular current earth-life...

"Suffering for something one did a long time ago which they have forgotten ?
People then call it an injustice because they think they had no past-complicity."

Making people suffer for something they have forgotten is unjust, because it doesn't serve the purpose of making people understand the bigger picture. Real justice would be to restore their memories first, so they can see their past-complicity, then provide evidence of their past-complicity in a fair trial, because of "In dubio pro reo", and only hold them accountable if their past-complicity is proven.

Whoever is punishing without making people remember first is evil.

"what if I told you that, for all of the children that have been INCINERATED in a furnace were once themselves adults who also INCINERATED children from hundreds of thousands or even millions or longer ago ?"

Real justice is not eye for an eye, especially if the so called "divine justice" is perceived as injustice because of memory loss. If you accept that, you accept that God is willing to burn children who don't know what's going on. This is pure evil. God does NOT want that at all.

"Should children be allowed to be abused and burned and incinerated whilst they are still ALIVE? Of course not!"

Exactly. That's why devine justice will not do it. A child without memory is considered innocent until memory is restored.

"IF YOU have PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED absolutely NO «happiness» for your WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE and have been CONSTANTLY ABUSED from the time you were a «child» [...] then, rest-assured, the «feelings» WILL creep in that EVERYBODY is DESERVING of being BURNED & INCINERATED;"

Yes. That's how evil spreads itself: through child abuse.

"now, ask yourself, from WHENCE do such «thoughts» «originate» and «flow» from...? Hint: NOT ALL of your «thoughts» are necessarily your OWN."

While the latter statement is correct, it's not the correct explanation why abused children think that way. I can explain to you why having these thoughts is plausible under natural law.

Abused children want everybody to burn because, when they experienced abuse, it was everybody else who was not helping. It was the neighbors who must have heard something, but didn't came over to look after you. It was the teacher in school who you tried to speak to, but he ignored you. It was the doctor who saw your bruises, but sent you back home. If you are an abused child that didn't get any help, from your point of view, the whole world betrayed you. That's why villains in fiction always want to destroy the world.

"Spirit-Possession (Neural-Linking) is a REAL Phenomena."

Yes, but the demons don't possess random people. You need real child abuse first in order to make the victims susceptible. Look into the MK ultra programs, for instance. It's just the tip of the iceberg. They need the betrayal of parents and society, as described above, to make the child want to burn down everything, so they are in resonance with what the demon wants. There is no demonic possession without preceding abuse.

"The Dark Sovereign Power itself CAN and DOES «interpolate» ITS «thoughts» into the MINDS of the «unwary» who know NOT that the «sin» (...) within them acts as a «medium» in a SIMILAR MANNER to being «contaminated/tainted» with drugs & alcohol;"

That's correct. But in order to corrupt the energies within them, you need preceding real world abuse and betrayal. It all started with betrayal to begin with. Children who were dependent on their parents have been betrayed. Parents chose to abandon their children for their own survival or other reasons. The parents didn't know that it was evil to do so. But this betrayal created the first hatred within the children, and now evil can have it's way to recreate the betrayal over and over again. To use that hatred against everybody else.

The higher spiritual purpose of this is so people can understand that the initial evil was the abandonment of the children. It's the consequences of this bad decision aeons ago that still manifest today. Betrayed children, full of hate, have become parents who also betrayed their children, because they were unable to let go of the hate.

As you see, you can't bring justice with an "eye for an eye" policy. It would just reinforce the hatred and keep the vicious cycle going. That's why spiritual masters, like Jesus, tell you that forgiveness is the way out.

"the purification & cleansing of the spirit-soul REQUIRES that one BE «forgiving» upon others so that they do NOT get into a «vengeful» mode..."

Exactly. But it's not that easy to do it right, because real forgiveness means to ensure that the mistake won't repeat. In this case, it means that people need to understand why abandoning children is evil. And it's even not enough to understand it – people need to adjust their behavior accordingly. This means, stop abandoning and betraying your children. Protect them, even against the state and so called authorities, no matter what it will cost you. But how many people do this in reality? How many still betray their own offspring because they fear the state, or the judgements of their religion?

"The Dark Sovereign Power..."

I need to clarify something. There is no dark "sovereign" power, because sovereignty means to "stand above" reign. Evil is never sovereign because it needs to reign, it depends on violence and coercion to rule others. If you think that sovereignty is the same as reign or rulership, you have fallen for mind control. The fallen ones want you to believe that a souvereign is a ruler, an archon, and that there is legitimacy to their violence, which is slavery.

You calling it "Dark Sovereign Power" shows me that the religion you subscribe to is evil, because you accept evil as a legitimate concept. But evil is an illegitimate concept. The fact that God allows it is because of free will – people are allowed to choose evil, so they can experience it. This doesn't mean that God approves of it. Instead, he wants you to understand why it is not and can never be legitimate.

@Aéius Cercle

"It's the sovereign-version of «spirit-possession» which is CONTROL."

A souvereign does not control other beings. As I already explained, a souvereign stands above control.

souver = super = above
reign = control

"The Sin-Free do have free-will; the sinners are CONTROLLED by their SIN."

The sinners also have free will, because they must be able to decide to overcome sin. If they were controlled, they would be damned forever, which seems to be a concept you really like.

"No, God is God, God is not «my» God; God is simply ALL."

I know. "Your God" means how you see God, your interpretation of what God is.

"YOU are the one who keeps trying to «play God» by claiming that «I've been brain-washed» (...) or that my «God» is «authoritarian» whilst you IRONICALLY go about engaging in this IRONIC «thought-policing» over the TRUTH that I have been «exposing» via the use of my «flawless» LOGICAL-REASONING abilities."

Your logic is not flawless, because you are unable to question your own premises, like for example what you think a souvereign is. You stick with what your Messiah tells you. His "testament of truth" is his attempt to create truth by speaking words, and the followers have to believe these words to be on the right path, which is classical authoritarian mindset. Your Messiah is the author of your thoughts, they are not your own. You also believe in the legitimacy of an evil God, and damnation. It's very clear that an evil religion has brainwashed you.

@Aéius Cercle

"Sovereign has everything to do with power. It often describes a person who has supreme power or authority, such as a king or queen."

That's the perverted definition made by the fallen ones. Slaves learn that false definition in order to accept their slave masters. There's also a nice side effect: If slaves conflate authority and souvereignty, they will strive to become the new authority in order to end their own slavery. This prevents real souvereignty and ensures the ongoing of the slavery system.

"to have sovereign power is to have absolute power—that is, power that cannot be checked by anyone or anything."

Only God has absolute power. No being inside a universe can have that power, because it would render universes as places of varying experience completely useless.

"Nations and states are also sometimes described as "sovereign." This means that they have power over themselves; their government is under their own control, rather than under the control of an outside authority."

Yes, this is what souvereignty actually means: to have power over oneself, not over others. A sovereign is someone who is not a slave. In that regard, a state who enslaves its citizens will also become a slave to a higher power. That's why no state on Earth is truly free. They don't respect rights, so they lose their sovereignty eventually.

"YOU do not seem to «know» the MEANING of the word: «sovereign»"

I use the word in its initial meaning, not in the distortet meaning that's used by evil.

"Why do you INSIST on DEMONSTRATING your «willful-ignorance» ?"

I don't ignore anything. I have considered your arguments and think that they are wrong.

"No, I speak with NO «emotion» regarding «like» nor «dislike» over this;"

That's the problem. You should feel a repelling emotion when it comes to damnation and controlling others.

"What is CLEAR is that YOU have been «brain-washed»"

Well, looks like a stalemate then.

"And I did NOT get my «thoughts» from The Messiah; The Messiah's writings simply MATCHED my own PRE-THIS-UNIVERSE-MEMORIES"

As I said, it already was your religion before you came here. It's still an evil religion.

"MY «memories» LITERALLY come from «heaven» itself (where NO «suffering exists»)"

Why are you okay with suffering then? You accept damnation, 2 billion years of torture, and burning innocent children as divine justice. Nobody would want you in heaven. Looks like you are here because you have fallen.

"absolutely NO amount of «sin» is PERMITTED within Heaven, and, call it «Authoritarian» that not even a SPECK of «sin» is permitted into Heaven"

No authoritarianism is permitted within heaven.

"take PERSONAL-RESPONSIBILITY and STOP SINNING !"

Wanting to own the truth like your Messiah does is a sin. My guess is that he was your leader before, and when he wanted to own the truth, which is not permitted in heaven, he was kicked out, and you with him.

"Do YOU have ANY «pre-earth-life» «memories» of an «existence» for which absolutely NO «wars» nor «suffering» EVER «existed» within it at all ?"

Yes. That's why I think that this planet is primitive.

"God is indeed «authoritarian» TO THOSE WHO ARE AUTHORITARIAN;"

No, he is not, because it doesn't make any sense. If he were authoritarian to those who are themselves authoritarian, he would simply command them to respect free will again.

"God PERMITS «Free-Will» to those who PERMIT «free-will» unto others."

God permits free will to everybody, so sinners can decide freely to respect free will again. Sadly, you don't respect free will, because you want sinners to be damned and tortured. The dark side is strong within you.

P.S: The «Messiah» (and I) came «here» VOLUNTARILY.
He obviously came here BEFORE I did (first as Yeshua ben Yosef).
Then he «re-incarnated» into the Flesh-Avatar of Terence de Malahèrre.
NEITHER of us was «kicked out» of «heaven» for being so-called «evil» OR «authoritarian» but we DID both go through «suffering» experiences during this particular modern-day «earth-life» so that we could gain a «conscious-understanding» of the «suffering» that people here in these «fallen-realms» experience so that we can better-assist them to help «over-come the sin (negative-emotions)» within them as we ourselves had also «over-come the sin (negative-emotions)» within ourselves. ALL «DIRECT-Incarnates» from Heaven DO «take on the sin» (become contaminated) JUST like EVERYONE ELSE who's here and are eventually forced to face their own «Crucifixion» (suffering for their past-complicities to suffering whilst they were still ignorant about the Absolute-and-IMMUTABLE Karmic-Law until «wisening» up after their «awakening» occurs; Jesus didn't recognise nor realise the falsities of the religious-teachings that he grew up with until he got older towards his 30s at which point he started «blaspheming» and being a «heretic» according to the religious-leaders of their day).

No, anger is NOT «normal» CONTRARY to «popular-belief» of humans;
No, hate is NOT «normal» CONTRARY to «popular-belief» of humans;
The NORMAL «state» of an ISBE is one that is HAPPY and calm and at PEACE.
No, sex is not a sin, for as long as no free-will is being violated, but, CONTROLLING as to when and how and whether or not others can or cannot have sex IS a «sin» BECAUSE it is a «free-will» INTERFERENCE similar to how «authoritarian» Driver's License Renewal-Fees (even when one has PROVEN to be capable of handling a car in a SAFE manner and NOT pose a «danger» unto others on the road) DOES IMPEDE in one's free-will to simply travel from Point A to Point B; the «authoritarian» Marriage-Licenses are also thus similar impedance against free-will where you are «submitting» to MAN-MADE «[Pseudo-]Law» to «decide» whether your «love» for each other is «legitimate» or not. Seek to «control» NONE or EXPECT the DSP to make you come undone.

"If you know about the Crucifixion-Project then you should also already know that they said that he actually didn't WANT it to happen"

Oh, that changes everything. It must be true because he said it. NOT.

"but at the same time it «couldn't be helped» in the CONTEXT of the «culture» of the time;"

What bullshit are you trying to sell us? They knew what they would do to him, so they could have prevented it, or helped him. That's what good people would have done.

"Nor did he «seek power» over others back then even though he DID work as a «cop» (policeman) during the modern-day incarnation as Terence Malaher"

So, he chose to be a willful order follower within an authoritarian system. This shows what he really believes.

"before «God» restored his memories of who he was."

So, God restored his memories that he was the one who sacrified the real Christ on the cross in order to found a religion. And the next thing he does is founding a new religion that is based on the idea of damnation and a vengeful God you have to fear.

How can you not see it?

I recommend to readers to look into the following debate as well. It's really eye opening.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72235-how-to-square-the-circle

"you claim to «hate religion» yet you «behave» EXACTLY like the «religious-fanatics» who «hate» those who do not «think» and «believe» EVERYTHING if it _not_ EXACTLY LIKE YOU;"

I hate religion in the sense of what the latin word "religare" means: to bind, to tie together, to hold back from progress. All religions that I know of do exactly that: they bind people and prevent the discovery of truth through dogma and authoritarian "testaments". They all say the same thing: "Believe the word that has been written, don't question it. There is no way to the truth than through your master, who is the only one who can tell you the truth."

Truth is not a testament. The way to truth is a methodology, which is based on logic. It is accepting that everybody can question everybody else, and that nobody can be in a position of being unquestionable.

I don't claim to speak or represent the one and only truth. That would be jumping to conclusions for everything. But I claim that if you don't use logic, whatever you claim can't be proven correct or incorrect. The conclusion must match the premise for something to be correct.

For example, when the premise is that your religion values forgiveness, and the observation in reality is that your God is willing to torture a man who already repented and wanted to do good, then the conclusion is that your God is not forgiving. The premise doesn't match the conclusion, or in other words: Your religion is lying when it states that it values forgiveness.

Using logic is the way to uncover wrongness and evil. It's not a question of belief. The logical analysis shows the fact of the matter. That's why evil hates it and fights and smears it wherever it can.

"WHY is it so HARD for YOU to «see» that you CANNOT «sin» and just «get off scott-free» as IF though ANOTHER's «crucifixion» has «paid for ALL your sins?»"

Neither do I say this, nor do I believe this. The crucifixion did not pay for any sin. It was a ritual conducted by an anti-christ in order to get rid of virtue (true Christianity) and start another satanic religion to replace it, eventually taking over Christianity and pervert it into so called Churchianity that is based on dogma and authoritarian mindset.

To understand true Christianity, see the "Fake-Ass Christians" presentation by Mark Passio linked below.

"Or that doing «charity works» PAYS OFF your «thieving» sins (which it doesn't) ?"

It's really simple: If you don't repent and refrain from theft, no charity work will compensate it. You can't be a thief, buy yourself free, be a thief again, buy yourself free again, etc. It doesn't work like that. Churchianity implemented that wrong idea. It has nothing to do with the true Christianity that Christ represented.

True redemption means you need to repent, which means you need to be authentically sorry, refrain from the wrong-doing, and apologize. The apology typically consists of making amends for the harm you brought to others. For example, if you have stolen from a hundred people, you need to help a hundred people that have been stolen from. After you have achieved this, it means that your apology can be seen as believable. It's a way of rebuilding trust.

True redemption requires NO torture (unless you think that apologizing and making amends is a torture.)

"you can ONLY be «saved» from being made to EXPERIENCE being «stolen from» once you STOP STEALING from others."

Making amends for the victims has the same effect as being stolen from. You lose what is not your rightful property. But if you give it back voluntarily, there has been no new crime committed, while being stolen from "in return" would be a new crime, because you need a thief to do it. As already explained, you will create a vicious cycle that the thief that stole from the thief also needs to be stolen from, and so forth. It never ends.

And this is yet another logical fallacy: If the perpetrator experiences it as being stolen from, it means there is no true repentance, thus no true understanding. Giving it back voluntarily means that the wrong-doing has been understood. This is the only way to apologize in a believable way.

"YOU are the one with the DANGEROUS «ideology» because you DO believe that you CAN go about committing «GENOCIDE» and «MURDER» and doing ALL sorts of «nasty things» against others like your «verbal-HOSTILITY» towards ME and ALL of those «sins» are «automatically forgiven» JUST BECAUSE you decide to do some charity."

As I explained above, I don't believe that at all.

"YOU are the one who has been «NASTY» towards ME, your Brother True who is simply trying to assist you"

I'm just saying that you are wrong in believing what you believe. That's not nasty at all. You do the same, and you feel right in doing so.

"With YOUR «ideology» of «WAR» and «PUNISHMENT» it is YOU who «incentivises» people who are very angry and MURDEROUS who are carrying machine-guns to go ahead and SHOOT at ALL of the people over the hill"

Man, you are really trying hard to exaggerate. Are you that desperate to frame me as an evil person? I'm just a proponent of defensive force. If a person is being attacked and force is necessary to stop the attacker, it's a right to use that force to stop the attacker. If there is no attacker, using that same force would be aggression, which is wrong. It's really easy to understand.

Fake-Ass Christians: