In the ET Psyop project, Aziz is saying the following:

[1:55:26] "I have come to think that we should really drop every idea of a good and a bad ET, or a good and a bad anything. It just doesn't make sense to me. What makes sense is what you see when you turn on a nature documentary: there's predators and there's prey. And when you add a higher level of intellect to predators and prey – like the gazelles, the lions, the cheetahs, the hippos, all that type of stuff – when you had a higher level of intellect, then the play, the theater of predator and prey relationship becomes more sophisticated. Suddenly you have states, nation states, vessels, propaganda. I mean, it's just things become more complicated, because the mind that's involved in the play is more complicated."

[1:56:24] "I'm thinking that there are beings that are engaged in a very complex predator/prey relationship, and the identity of good and evil is a simplistic interpretation that is applicable for a mind that isn't prepared to grapple with the complexities of nature. And I would call that propaganda to say that there is the goods and the bads, and I'm just sort of trying to reach myself out of this. I could be wrong."

Dear Aziz, you are indeed wrong. It's not complicated at all:

If your intellect is developed enough to understand what you've just said, evil means to wilfully choose to be a predator despite the fact that you can survive not being a predator, and good means to wilfully choose to not be a predator.

You say:

[1:57:16] "And it also makes me feel a lot better about myself, and more empowered to try to pursue better abilities on my own side of things, because if I acknowledge that I'm in this jungle predator/prey relationship world, well, the first thing I want to do is have better tools, and value my own intellect, my own abilities, and I want to sharpen my sword, so to speak. I think it's very empowering to drop the ideas of goods and evils entirely, and to acknowledge the predator/prey dynamic of the galactic jungle that we live in."

No, you feel better because if you deny evil, it seems like you are not surrounded by it anymore. But this is a fallacy. You are still surrounded by predators.

The concept of good and evil does not contradict the concept of the galactic jungle. The harsh truth is that a hell of a lot of beings out there still choose to be predators despite the fact that they are intellectually and technologically advanced enough to stop being predators.

But this doesn't mean that there aren't beings who have chosen to not be predators and to respect self-ownership. Those would be the good ones. Ask Harvey and the others what they really believe.

I did feel tempted to challenge Aziz premise somewhat. I basically agree with Aziz in context. But I think him and Courtney are sort of aligning opposite polarities. "Good and evil" vs "there is no good and evil". But this is sort of the postmodern interpretation in which we keep challenging words themselves instead of asking how do we make use of the language. When people say "there are no stupid questions" I say yes there is! When someone says "there is no heaven or hell" I say yes tgere is! Be creative you will find some appropriate interpretation for basically every word in the dictionary.

I think Aziz wants us to appreciate that the galaxy is an ecosystem of diverse philosophies. As civilizations advance you'll find more extremes, more variations, more diversity.

But let's not kid ourselves. If you're reaching for the extremes of what conquering civilizations are possible, you can come up with some pretty horrifying examples.

If the "bad guys" want to call themselves "good guys" that's their prerogative. I don't have qualms about killing assholes that think it's ok to perpetually rape kids and pawn them off to just reincarnate them for further servitude: yeah that's pretty evil and anyone who wants to go defend them is pretty evil too.

I think there's another psychological effect at play here.

Getting rid of the concept of "good vs. evil" and replacing it with "predator vs. prey" makes you aware of a fact that a more simplistic view of good and evil won't tell you: Are you predator, or are you prey?

So the subconscious (or even conscious) wish is to not be prey anymore. To get stronger. But if you're surrounded by predators, you need allies. If you tell all of them that they are evil, they won't ally with you.

So there's a strategical component of getting stronger through alliances.

For example, if there is such a thing as a Galactic Federation or similar faction, it could well be that their strategy was in the past to tolerate a certain degree of predatory behavior in order to get a foothold against the real bad ones. So, you can't tell your allies now that all predatory behavior is wrong, because it would threaten the alliance you are depending on to win the war.

I think this is why it's complicated. It's idealism vs. harsh reality.

Regarding "how to sharpen your own sword"...

I highly recommend to have a look at the natural law expressions described in the linked videos here:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72111-understanding-natural-law#post-408529

Especially understanding the "internal expressions" of sovereignty and confusion is crucial knowledge for developing psychic abilities and getting better at it. If you are in the state of confusion, which means you don't own yourself because you don't know how, your psychic abilities will be limited or absent.

In short: It's crucial that you understand what sovereignty actually is, and this will help you with your psychic abilities as well.

Why we live on a prison planet:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72396-understanding-rights

The invention of the food chain:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72466-predator-prey-good-evil-alien-interview