Dan Winter and the physics of soul YT videos attempt to answer the questions you have. If you like Courtney Brown's commentary then you'll like Dan Winter's videos - they have that nutty professor aesthetic but very nuanced, profound, and informative.

Thanks Druj, yes definitely this is the cocaine of my thinking

Edit; this is original post

I try to think a lot about "sacred geometry" - but then I start to think that calling it "sacred geometry" only serves to alienate it from the larger community and subdivides it into a weird little new age niche. So instead: It's just geometry. But a specific interest around geometry.

Some of the original speeches from physicist Nassim Haramein fascinated me. But this question keeps on popping up for me which is why the freemasons put so much emphasis on the needle and compass, and secondly why crop circles focus so much on circular geometry. I started to wonder about trigonometry. Because trigonometry is just as much about circle geometry as it is about triangles, arguably.

Now correct me if I'm wrong, or if I'm not making sense: But I start to find that all trigonometry is is understanding how the Sine function works. Once you understand the Sine (sinusoidal) function, you can pretty much figure out everything else using algebra. I suck at calculus and algebra but I think you can pretty much figure out anything about the triangle by hand by taking the degree, and then finding the derivative of the Sine wave at that degree. Maybe this next part makes more sense-

I start to understand the Sine ratios of the common angles, and actually the way we're taught trig is so convoluted and confusing, when there's so much more intuitive ways of understanding it. Now once you understand the fundamentals of the sine wave, you understand electromagnetism and just some pretty fundamental stuff about physics. So arguably, once you really understand the sine wave, you can start using that to understand . . . just about everything else.

The majority of this post is what I think is a more intuitive approach to trig. Maybe it'll make sense, maybe it won't.

First off, if you use Tau instead of pi (Tau = 2pi), you're no longer memorizing all kinds of weird angles to figure out the radians. Say you divide the circle into 24 parts, and you number the dots from zero to 23, counterclockwise from the right-most point. Now you put (Tau (number of that point) / 24) and that is your radian. You can simplify the fraction any time. To think of what the sine ratio is associated with each point, you do the following-

Ignore the fractions that can't be simplified for now (these are a bit more complicated but I'll still explain them after). Make the following fraction for each point ((a^1/2)/2). Now plug into "a" the whole number corresponding to the buoyancy of the point. I know "buoyancy" is not a math term. But just think: 0 is at the even level. 1 is one level up. 2 is the next, 3 is the next, 4 is at the very top. And then the circle goes back down, so you plug into "a" 3, then 2, then 1, then 0, then you're going below the horizontal line, so you do the same thing going negative. You will see once you simplify those fractions, they are the correct sine ratios that you see in familiar trigonometry.

Now if you remember the angles that I said to ignore, these are basically ( : (6^1/2) : (2^1/2)) / 4 ), but the signs where I put the ":" colon just correspond to where the point is on the circle. If it's highest, make it all positive, if it's lowest, make it all negative. If it's a little high, make only the bigger numerator term positive. If it's a little lower, make only the little numerator term positive.

What is sine, really? Well draw any segment from the center to the circumference. Call the point intersecting the circumference "n". Now draw a vertical segment dropping down from point n to the horizontal line, and call that intersecting point "g". length of Radius * sin = length of segment ng.

What is cosine? It's just the calculation of the segment going from the center to "g". How do you figure out the cosine? You turn the circle one quarter turn counterclockwise, and then you write out all the cosine ratios exactly how you did the sine ratios.

Now here's where I go extra off the deep end. Experiencing sine waves is how we experience our world. The things we see and hear, and even touch and olfactory and gustatory because these are just chemical experiences of things emitting complex sine waves. And the difference between experiencing these things and understanding them is understanding where these waves are coming from, and what they're doing.

Now here's where I go extra off the deep end. In our mainstream we are taught to experience the tone of things, rather than the fundamental meanings behind them. We are not taught real spelling, because real spelling would be an intuitive understanding between a tone and a shape. The shape would always mean the tone. Instead, we're just taught to hear things and say things. This is the say - tone - ic language. We don't know what it means really, and we're pushed to not care. Don't know, don't care, just hear it and say what you hear. Parrot the phrase and sound. Say - tone -ic.

But once you know the angles, the fundamental connections between what's producing the waves, you start to learn the angle language or the angelic language. Angel - ic.

We must shift our awareness from the say - tone - ic language into the angel - ic language. Is that part of the mystery behind all this geometry in the crop circles and the freemason compass?

I hope this hippy weird woowoo bizarre statement was in some way beneficial to you - or . . . my sort of apologies in advance if it was a complete waste of your time.