A remote view session done of Farsight ET Board meeting, which one i didn't get it!

"Target objective is to penetrate Courtney Brown and his team of remote viewers at the time of their ET board meeting for the month of May 2025 specifically when the camera is rolling during their on camera discussion. The primary objective is to optimally perceive the points of discussion but also to determine if we can be perceived by farsight remote viewers during the meeting and be acknowledged that our presence is there."

My thoughts on this:

The viewer is on target, perceiving two subjects in the beginning. Those were the ones he was allowed to see, because the meeting is protected. Later on, the room lights up, because the viewer and the intention behind the "experiment" has been vetted. In other words: The viewer was not harmful, so they allowed him to see more.

Now the question is, quote from the video, timestamp 32:27:

"The question you need to ask yourself is, why wouldn't these ETs turn around and say to Courtney and the other Farsight viewers, just so you know, there's other remote viewers here? Why wouldn't they? Tying these two things together would literally be a silver bullet for proving his claims. And yet, they don't make that connection for him. So, it's something we got to think about."

Okay, let's think about that:

What the tasker wanted the ETs to do is not a simple acknowledgement, but to let the viewer become part of the video recording. Their operation is called "Precognitive Party Crashers". This means that they came without an invitation. It's like those situations where a reporter is talking into the camera, and some random dude walks into the picture greeting his grandma because it's cool to be on television.

Why would they allow this? What's the gain for everybody else?

So, let's think further: Let's imagine they did allow it and gave the viewer a presence in the video. How would they introduce him? There's a human remote viewer here? Well, there's always human remote viewers present at these meetings, so that's not a new information. The viewer would have to formally introduce himself so everybody knows who he is, including the audience watching Farsight's video. Would he be able to do that? And what does he say next? I stumbled in here because I'm doing a blind remote viewing right now? And what then?

It's literally an embarrassing moment for the viewer. He wouldn't look good at all.

So, the ETs gave you the proof you needed: That they were there, and that connection is possible.

Next time, just ask them instead of interrupting an important meeting for egotistical reasons.

Just be polite.

!"What the tasker wanted the ETs to do is not a simple acknowledgement, but to let the viewer become part of the video recording. Their operation is called "Precognitive Party Crashers". This means that they came without an invitation. It's like those situations where a reporter is talking into the camera, and some random dude walks into the picture greeting his grandma because it's cool to be on television."

I don't think this was their purpose, i don't believe they wanted recognition, i believe their target purpose was to find answers about these board meetings, just like some of us have questions about the beings coming, however i do think the fact hat Dave make that statement also tells me their bias towards the meetings, hence im seeing him focusing only in this questions and not all other possibilities..

The only reason i shared this was just because it's the first target we have OF the et board meetings, for now, which helps gather more information about these beings and it shows indeed what many others claim, like Cliff High a supposedly remote viewer that states , "the viewers of Farsight are delusional thinking they are talking with someone or an ET", or even others that don't believe there are actually ET's and A.I.'s in the board meeting.. so here is another remote viewer not attached to Farsight presenting his data.

Me and Del remote spied on Courtney's house one time. Del's results were uncanny. I emailed Courtney about it, he said it was fun. 😉

Just to give you context.

@Artur Faria:

"i believe their target purpose was to find answers about these board meetings"

And they got answers.

"The only reason i shared this was just because it's the first target we have OF the et board meetings"

I made a target a while ago:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/remote-viewing-practice-forum/71139-target-7824-3245

Unfortunately, not many viewers are participating.