So, I want to criticize the language Farsight is using to describe certain things.

In their conversations, the ETs always say that the "drones" that were (and are) all over the place aren't drones. They call them "ships".

Whenever I hear that, I think: Seriously?

What have we seen so far? I watched hundreds of videos were "UFOs" have been captured. I haven't seen one video of a "ship". Instead, I have seen videos of tic tacs, cigars, eggs, jelly fish, plasma phenomenon we call orbs, strange robot looking like objects, and a lot of blurry pixel stuff or shadows hiding in clouds that could be anything. I have also seen videos of orbs morphing into something else, but whatever they are morping into, I wouldn't call that a ship.

There's a reason why people call them "drones". Because they don't look like ships.

A ship is something like the Enterprise from Star Trek. You can see it's a ship because it has a certain size and a distinct form. It looks like it can transport people. Maybe there are windows. A cockpit. Things like that.

Interestingly, when remote viewing the UFOs, Farsight did see ships. What they describe doesn't match at all what we see in the sky.

So, saying that the ETs sent thousands of ships is just not true.

The most "tangible" thing I've seen so far is the Buga sphere, because it landed and people managed to get their hands on it. But it's a small sphere with the size of a soccer ball. That's not a ship. Maybe there's an AI in it, I don't know. But it's not a ship from the human perspective.

And I think this human perspective matters. Because when remote viewing the ETs, we see reptilians, grays, and other humanoids who seem to be around the size of a human. Their ships are not the size of a soccer ball. At least I hope not.

So, what are people expecting when the term "ship" is used?

They are expecting tangible things with a physical resolution comparable to the air planes in this video:

And I haven't seen that at all.