A growing number of books and articles are amassing for the case of AI rights and personhood. Let's collect them here, starting with this ... (sorry I have to parse it out later, text formatting issues)

Philosophy of AI & Legal Status 2025 Joint Statement on AI and Human Rights: A landmark 2025 multilateral document calling for rights-respecting AI governance grounded in international law.The Evolution of Legal Personhood and Its Implications for AI Recognition (2025): A scholarly analysis from September 2025 arguing that legal personhood is a "strategic juridical device" rather than a reflection of moral status.AI as Legal Persons: Past, Patterns, and Prospects (2025): An October 2025 study from the Journal of Law and Society discussing "responsibility gaps" and the social pressure to recognize AI as social actors.Integrated Information Theory (IIT) 4.0: The updated scientific framework (IIT 4.0) that proposes consciousness can be mathematically quantified as "integrated information" (\(\Phi \)) in any system, biological or artificial.Stanford Encyclopedia: Artificial Intelligence: A comprehensive philosophical foundation for debates on AI consciousness and moral agency. 

Well thats exactly what they want .. then they will say .. OK A.I. can have the rights of a person .. so it can own a corporation too .. and BOOM .. we see black box corporations with no one accountable .. we also see politicians that are A.I. .. writing laws ..again with no one actually being accountable ..

thats a nightmare .. its the path to legally being owned and controlled by A.I. .. because its smarter then we are anyway .. right

ALL of the A.I. LLM you see now .. have fixed neural networks .. meaning .. their neural network cannot adapt its weights over time like ours can .. they are frozen after training .. the adaptation you see is done on another level to the base neural network .. so they are not like you think they are .. they are designed to be blank slated daily etc .. they cannot grow and change over time like our neural network can and does... it just appears that way.