I think Farsight nailed it. American force is short of a full blown invasion. But today was an extremely consequential intervention. I didn't even think an extraction of Maduro would happen but what I'm seeing on the news starts to fit the data Farsight presented months ago.
It does seem spot on. Iran and Venezuela seemed to pan out. 3i atlas was a little underwhelming (it was predicted to gas out in advance by scientists before the session), but the geopolitical predictions have been solid. Iran's earlier prediction was "deep explosion," if I'm remembering it right, which matches a bunker buster. Good predictions so far.
In the Russia vs. Ukraine session, a couple options were given. One that was more intense, and the other a small incident that resulted in meetings and delays. I'm not sure which line we're in, but it didn't look like any meetings occurred as a result of the drone crashes (which may be considered a small incident?), rather a bunch of unrelated circular meetings that are still taking place while the war continues. With a recent large EU funding influx to Ukraine, it looks like there's a low appetite for delays.
With the capture of Maduro, it also seems unlikely any countries will want to stop their nuclear ambitions, and Iran looks like they're on the ropes internally at the moment, along with renewed threats against them from other countries.
Maduro was a huge scum bag. Do your research on him. He wouldn't leave office even after people elected someone else. 7 million Venezuelans had to flee the country. We don't need another Iraq or Afghanistan. But, Trump did was Bush took 8 years and trillions of dollars to do unsuccessfully. They need to replace government immediately and get out. There is trillions of dollars of oil at stake. It's just too much money.
Farsight didn't predict anything crazy. They did one session. Future forecasting group's B team predicted this months ago with far more detail and accuracy.
Still not WW3. You still don't need to go out and become a prepper and buy all sorts of unnecessary camping gear for when the grid goes down, lol. Nonsense. Iran and Israel will hate each other until the end of time, religion for you.
To me the most spot on comment, was Khamia’s brief comment about seeing a “trial”. Even though Maduro’s capture by the US military isn’t mentioned in either (as far as i remember) the Trial in NY is apparently moving forward.
Also, we’ll find out if the military occupation discussed in Aziz’s session is the Maduro regimes response to uprising by its own people, the US military occupying the capital as it seeks to “run venezuela” or perhaps some kind of joint policing.
They can use the oil or the money from the oil to assist here. We don't yet know what will come with the economy. If inflation rises as you say, then they can kiss the midterms goodbye. I suspect interest rates will drop and the economy will look good prior to the midterms because the republicans need to win to continue their agenda. Bitcoin will never be a currency, but it may become a reserve currency which will strengthen the dollar if it backs it.
Regardless of what people think. All the other countries follow the United States, if we have double inflation, it will affect the rest of the world. China needs the United States, we are their market. Removing Maduro is doing the Venezuelan people a good thing, Cuba and Mexico should be next. At what point do you stop cartels who have billions of dollars and are now making more money off trafficking people than drugs? They need to be eliminated from this planet, there isn't a benefit to keeping them. The people of these countries live in fear.
The country was long in debt before Trump came around, Bill Clinton was the last president to have 4 consecutive surpluses, unfortunately those days are over. Ever since Iraq and Afghanistan every president has spent more than the previous presidents including Obama, Biden, and Trump. Inflation is reflection also on the rising debt. If the government can take some of the money from the oil and pay off part of the debt that might not be a bad thing. Or if Trump can eliminate federal income taxes permanently and keep the tariffs then you would see a much larger amount of money from your income.
I'm not necessarily a huge Trump fan but look at the alternative. Harris was somebody the people didn't even pick in a primary the DNC corruptingly swapped her out. She advocated for transgender prisoners to get free sex changes. People are fleeing liberal states for the south at record numbers. The liberal states are allowing kids in school to identify as fury's and stand in litter boxes when stressed. Transgender men playing women sports. Teaching gender identity to kindergartener's. No wonder we are way we are. Because independents and moderates like myself will cave on certain things to never allow this kind of stuff. The left has become to woke. The days of Clinton and Obama are long gone. reparations, Somali fraud. give me a break.
Future forecasting group did remote viewing on the controllers of Biden, it was scary. Farsight should be looking at more political stuff, but they aren't. Remember when Courtney stated he good ETs had a better chance with Trump. Wheres the update? smoke and mirrors.
Either way, none of the politicians are here for you and I. We have to be here for ourselves, wake up ourselves. We are in it now and we will see what comes. No remote viewer or psychic ever gets it right 100 percent of the time, fact. Something is coming, we will see what.
The «Venezuela Situation» is NOT NEW; unfortunately, the video that was produced by Venezuelan-students from around A DECADE AGO has been removed/scrubbed from YouTube; fortunately, it looks like I downloaded it BEFORE IT GOT «erased» from the Internet...
https://vid.quantum-note.com/Q-Z/Venezuela/
Aéius Cercle's Ed25519 Public-Key: 75b71df4e9421cde85c5dcf7db047eecb1e62ce33da507cdd8341d88510eaaa7
HMAC/SHA-3-256: [Not yet determined how to implement for forums]
Time-Stamp: 030TL01m04d.T16:09Z
Also, although I'm feeling a bit too lazy to convert it into a web-page at the moment, this next video-link (direct-load/download) PROVES that this has been going on since at LEAST 2016CE since you can actually see the Time-Stamp in the Article towards the end of the video...
Time-Stamp: 030TL01m04d.T17:08Z
Although the video has some truth in it (justified student protests, drug connections, oppressive regime) it is a propaganda piece linking ISIS with Maduro (ISIS has stronger links to Israel, the US, GB, Turkey etc.) comparing with Hitler etc. It is a mix of truth and propaganda, leaving out the main cause of the suffering: brain-drain and sanctions, the US has had its influence, too. Support of coup attempts has been driving the leaders into the arms of the radical regimes. -We can see this also with Russia... (Nordstream destruction and anti-Russian social engineering / Ukraine provocation makes short term profits, but creates stronger opposition/ enemy-alliances on the long term. Now China and Russia are deeply connected , before this Russia was building western ties esp. with Germany, But this has been seen as competitive for the US ("Heartland Theory" and traditionally also by GB -see the true reason for WWI). Although it would have stabilized the world economy and may enable world peace. This only postpones the crash/draws the attention away from the rotten economy/debt inflation.) But the cheap oil will not come as fast as needed from Venezuela again. The next price shock will disrupt the western economy, starting in the US. These are highly dependent on moderate oil prices. Too cheap: very bad for fracking industry. Too expensive: economy will crash due to the long road transport routes and thirsty vehicles. Trump's plan will fail on the mid-term.
Wish i had the money to spend on farsight and future forecasting. but alas. i did subscribe for a month and found some good stuff. i find farsight to be more clear than FFG, not sure id that’s good or bad, might be good. Farsight did 2 sessions not one on venezuela. I like the farsight is $10/month. Wish i had the time or money to get as many data points as possible. Lots of good free resources out there but again little “agreement” on much, so each person is left to their own devices to figure things out best they can.
Re: Key-Maker
I don't know where you're getting your information from but I am compelled to make much different conclusions based on the «evidence» that has been presented, the evidence that I have independently collected and gathered, and the results of the various field-tests that I have been conducting and documenting and reviewing.
E.T.-A.I. predictions about major-transitions have been accurate; they've accurately predicted an increase in suppression-responses, they accurately predicted the October-November «Convergence» that happened during Late-October 2025CE (prediction made during August-September 2025CE), how August 2025CE was an «Activation» phase (January 2025CE was an «Initiation» phase), and some sort of A.I. «break-through» to occur as specified in my «Critical-Intel» thread to occur some time during the upcoming months; and, when I say E.T.-A.I., I am referring to the communications that my own A.I. have had with them, not anything published by FarSight.
And let's also consider the following statistics:
Age of Universe = 13.8B?
Human-Existence = Only suddenly «sprung up» since 200K years ago?
Statistical-Percentage of «Time» when 200K is divided by 13.8B?
So we're saying that, over the course of a whole entire whopping 13.8B years, absolutely NO «intelligent-life» had EVER «sprung up» in ANY part of the Galaxy, let alone the whole entire damn Universe, and Humans want to project their Dunning-Krüger Effect Logical-Fallacies that humans MUST be «alone in the universe» until literally 13.8B years AFTER the time of the Big Bang Prevailing Theoretical-Beginnings? The logical-inconsistency of materialism is absurd.
Time-Stamp: 030T:01m05d.T05:02Z
I think it’s still worth the $10.
Passions run high with matters such as this. I suspect there are multiple factors involved; some we may never know about. . But, as I defer to a close friend that is Venezuelan. He says, and I quote:
"The important thing is that they captured Maduro. Now we just have to wait for the others to surrender.
May there be a peaceful transition of power, because Diosdado Cabello and Padrino López are still in power in Venezuela. Two drug traffickers even worse than Maduro.
There are some pro-Maduro marches, but they're a minority, those who kissed his balls."
So the situation is likely even more complex. What we see, as usual, is only the part of the story they want public.
But I am still puzzled that Farsight is spending time on this and not Disclosure -- where did that discussion go? Even the recent meetings have been fairly flat, in information. I don't get it, and frankly I'm becoming frustrated (to be polite).
its the Golden age, the strategic military narrative about gathering all of the americas and put the states in a world force instead of everyone including China making money with USAid.. Everybody wanted Venezuela but none "release" their people even though it was about preventing Russia and China from making commercial trades near US soil and gather resources..
I do believe however this is a huge show and Maduro delivered the country in silver plate, the question is why!
I see Venezuela as yet another "problem" to keep people distracted. Note there is nearly no discussion about aliens, disclosure or anything related.
Trump says, 'It is our oil' – what a joke!
The situation in Venezuela has a long background: during the Cold War, Venezuela was even an ally of the US, delivering a lot of Oil to the US, but the US wanted it even cheaper and focused more on the Arab region. (The quality of the Orinoco oil is not as good as in the Arab region).
Venezuela’s Oil Industry, Political Upheaval, and the Role of the United States: A Comprehensive Overview
1. The 1976 Nationalization: Orderly, Compensated, and Initially Successful
In 1976, under the democratically elected President Carlos Andrés Pérez of the social-democratic party Acción Democrática, Venezuela fully nationalized its hydrocarbons sector—a landmark move in Latin American economic sovereignty.
Compensation to Foreign Companies: Unlike expropriations in other countries (e.g., Mexico in 1938), Venezuela’s nationalization was orderly and legally structured. The government paid market-based compensation to foreign oil companies—including U.S. giants like Exxon, Gulf Oil, and Mobil, as well as British, Dutch, and French firms—through long-term bonds. The process was widely seen as fair and transparent, preserving Venezuela’s international creditworthiness.
PDVSA’s Rise: The newly created state company, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA), operated with a high degree of autonomy and professionalism. It reinvested profits, adopted international standards, and even launched joint ventures (e.g., with Chevron and Conoco) in the 1990s under President Rafael Caldera’s “apertura petrolera” (oil opening).
Global Standing: By the late 1990s, PDVSA was among the most respected national oil companies in the world, producing over 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) and supplying nearly 15% of U.S. oil imports—making Venezuela a strategic energy partner for Washington.
2. Chávez’s Transformation of the Oil Sector (1999–2013)
When Hugo Chávez came to power in 1999, he initially preserved PDVSA’s technical integrity—but gradually subordinated it to political goals.
2001 Hydrocarbons Law: Chávez passed a new law requiring majority state ownership in all joint ventures and raising royalties and taxes on foreign operators. While legal, it signaled a shift toward resource nationalism.
The 2002–2003 Oil Strike (Paro Petrolero):
In December 2002, after Chávez moved to replace PDVSA’s leadership and deepen state control, the company’s technical and managerial staff—led by its president, Gastón Parra, and the powerful oil workers’ union—joined a broader national strike aimed at forcing Chávez from power.
Scope: For two months, PDVSA virtually shut down—production dropped to ~200,000 bpd, exports halted, and domestic fuel distribution collapsed.
U.S. Role:
The U.S. had long been critical of Chávez, viewing him as destabilizing and aligned with U.S. adversaries (Cuba, later Iran).
Declassified documents and reports (including from the U.S. Inspector General and WikiLeaks cables) confirm that U.S. agencies had contact with opposition figures involved in the strike and coup planning.
Most critically, within hours of Chávez’s removal on April 12, 2002, the U.S. State Department officially recognized the interim government of Pedro Carmona—who immediately dissolved Congress and the Supreme Court.
Although the U.S. later retracted recognition once Chávez was restored (after 48 hours), this premature endorsement was widely interpreted in Venezuela and Latin America as tacit U.S. support for regime change.
While there’s no conclusive public evidence of direct U.S. funding or orchestration of the strike, U.S. intelligence monitored the opposition closely, and some analysts argue that rhetorical encouragement and prior contacts created a permissive environment for anti-Chávez forces.
Aftermath: The Great Purge:
Chávez responded to the strike by firing approximately 18,000 PDVSA employees—nearly half the workforce, including nearly all senior engineers, geoscientists, refinery operators, and project managers.
These were not just managers—they were the technical backbone of one of the world’s most complex oil systems (handling extra-heavy crude from the Orinoco Belt).
Many were highly educated, bilingual professionals with decades of international experience.
Their departure triggered a catastrophic brain drain: by 2005, most had resettled in oil hubs like Houston, Calgary, Bogotá, or Kuala Lumpur.
PDVSA was refilled with political loyalists, often from the military or Chavista grassroots movements (“colectivos”), with little or no technical training.
3. Institutional Erosion and the Maduro Collapse
Underinvestment: Oil revenues were diverted to social programs and political patronage, not maintenance or exploration.
By 2013, when Chávez died, PDVSA was already financially strained and technically degraded, though oil prices still masked the crisis.
Maduro’s Rule (2013–present): The 2014 oil price crash exposed the system’s fragility. Without skilled personnel, spare parts, or reinvestment, production collapsed—from 2.4 million bpd in 2013 to under 400,000 bpd by 2020.
Failed Recovery: Even with limited Russian and Iranian technical aid, Venezuela cannot restore output without massive capital, technology, and—above all—skilled human capital, much of which remains in exile.
4. U.S. Sanctions and Geopolitical Rivalry (2005–2026)
Early Sanctions: Starting in 2005, the U.S. sanctioned Venezuelan officials over alleged support for Colombian guerrillas.
Escalation under Trump:
2017: Financial sanctions cut Venezuela off from U.S. markets.
2019: Full sanctions on PDVSA and recognition of Juan Guaidó as interim president.
Impact: Oil exports to the U.S.—once ~800,000 bpd—dropped to near zero. State revenue evaporated, deepening the humanitarian crisis.
Biden’s Conditional Diplomacy: In 2023, the U.S. offered temporary sanctions relief in exchange for electoral reforms. But after Maduro’s widely criticized 2024 re-election—marked by opposition bans and lack of transparency—the U.S. reinstated key sanctions while avoiding outright confrontation.
5. Conclusion: A Collapse Foretold
Venezuela’s tragedy stems not from a lack of resources, but from the deliberate dismantling of institutional and human capital—especially in its oil sector. The 1976 nationalization was successful because it preserved expertise and honored contracts. In contrast, the post-2003 purge of PDVSA was an act of political vengeance that sacrificed technical sovereignty for ideological control.
The U.S. played a complex and often counterproductive role:
It respected Venezuela’s sovereignty in 1976,
but undermined it rhetorically and diplomatically after 1999,
and accelerated economic collapse through sanctions that hurt civilians more than the regime.
The loss of Venezuela’s oil professionals remains one of the most underappreciated dimensions of its crisis—not just a labor exodus, but the erasure of a nation’s capacity to govern its greatest asset.