Bro you *mad* dude.
You need like a little yahtzee game or a snuggle with your favorite stuffy or something
@Tazz:
I'm not mad.
You already confirmed that you have no problem with being an archon.
As an archon – which is a believer in authority – you are cheering for a system that enables child abuse on a large scale.
Your holy republic doesn't prevent pschopaths like Epstein.
Your holy republic enables them.
I'm watching you implode into your weird myths RN. It's kind of pretty as much as it's weird
@Tazz:
"I'm watching you implode into your weird myths RN."
So, the government enabling child rapists and human trafficking is a myth again.
It get it: Your kind of government will do better.
We'll see.
So the world affairs suggest that it's possible the archives and records won't really exist as it did.
But if it helps to frame it mentally, a lot of this sovereign law stuff really arises from the laws of the "wild west"
Well we may approach such a time. It's kind of uncertain what it can become. A gestapo state or a delapitated wild west? But both require a mindset where a better understanding of traditional law counts. Much of it was built by centuries of philosophers and fighters for those carefully thought models of civilization. In a gestapo state, all the better to have many that can already identify the criminal behavior not just lump facts together pointing at everyone as the enemy. In a "wild west" or broken yet open state, a knowledge of how laws worked before is also essential. What's a big fact that gets smoke-screened again and again is that there are distinctly two layers of, let's say, behavioral mechanisms.
One is what was built up as law which was basically an emergence of the british peasantry rebelling against the Crown (and the real Crown, not just the proxy king's hat "crown" people think it represents). And yes it also incorporates the tribes of the nation to have real land, as is verbalized as land patents in both old and modern parlance.
You can sit and wait believing a crumbling empire will make a golden bridge to bear fruit for all your alleged glamorous future, or you can begin now.
The basic principle is simple enough, though I know sone of the legalese gets bothersome. But they would have you rack your brain with meaningless tax law and weird filing already.
it's basically like this. Both the man / woman and the land need to have their status corrected. County recorders and notary publics are used, not because they're the answer to everything but ... they're record keepers. They're good at what they do. And they aren't tied to banks and mega law firms like some think.
Anyhow you recover the original documents, or at least shour efforts to uncover them. Your own long form birth certificate, and the land's original certificate by the governer. In some cases it literally says "king". You show the lineage of it going from man / wiman to man / woman down to you. And you take all of it to the county recorder and (here just remember it this way: record the sh*t out of it) - and publish in the paper your "bringing forward" the land patent. Say in the article where disputes can be sent for 30 days. The dispute needs to have documentation for ownership of another man or woman. Have a specialized mailbox for this to record the incoming mail.
After 30 days take all your records now, back to the county recorder to verify as proof that the issue is undisputed and therefore acquiesced. Send the documentation back to the IRS and all other tax fraud vultures. Add notice of an assembly and militia. Don't put aggressive language, just notice that these things exist.
I know this is a broad summary not the mini steps but for anyone carrying a deed to a property you may want to consider why you don't hold the superior title when you've put your own blood and sweat into it all these years
You cling to the old ways, which is the belief that you can make law (as an authority).
You can't make law. It's an illusion.
Ok so context- this is the video
This is the book they talk about in the video
It took me a while but here is where, legally, "Sovereign Citizen" is legitimized. A corporate fiction like the FBI has no place arguing law.
Dred Scott v Stanford 60 US 393 Item 26
The words 'people of the United States' and 'citizens' are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the 'sovereign people,' and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty.
Just so everyone knows, each «state» across the «united States of America» is essentially its own «country» and the various «STATES» within the «United States» are also their own corporations.
Evidence-Base: Each «state/STATE» (and «province/PROVINCE») has their OWN «Constitution(s)»
Time-Stamp: 030TL03m09d/15h06Z
Some forum members like to write a lot.
I thought they should try something called self‑publishing. Amazon helps with that.
They have a service called Kindle Direct Publishing.
You can publish your book free of charge, and if you earn any money, it’s yours.
I don't know which forum members you're talking about Edward 😉 ...
I keep telling another dear soul from the forum I could work on content from a personal platform rather than trolling forums. Alas, I get impatient and think "at least if I'm too adhd to complete my own projects then I can spill these fragmented points in a place that I cherish anyhow"
I find it interesting, though, how modern day writing has difficulty *combining* their efforts in a productive way.
I start to think that this kind of fragmented way of thinking may serve a greater evolutionary purpose. If you are able to link just a few of these thinkers that contribute in bits rather than a whole to one or a few ultimate projects (without incorporation or hierarchically controlled memberships) - you now have a recipe to produce effective things ... out of the "ether" , having no head, resilient against co-opting.
We're obviously not there yet. But it makes me wonder if weird forumites as a cultural niche may yet serve a purpose. You know ... those strange people, whomever they are.
Edward
More sovcit stuff
A video explaining how the 14th amendment was never ratified.
This implicates everything you do today. Americans were never supposed to be living a corporate empire.
If you have *anything* in court, and you post the history of the unratified 14th amendment as a rebuttable presumption ... I can promise one thing. The courts will avoid your case because no matter what criminality they claim with you: your evidence reveals the ponzi scheme that's getting played in open court, of the vast criminality from the corporation they represent