Quote from the Spotlight titled "Disclosure and the Stripper Girl":
[49:17] "And second, it would replace one imposed order with another, thereby violating the very principle of autonomy. The intervention seeks to protect. So, if liberation is imposed rather than chosen, it is structurely indistinguishable from conquest."
No, it is not. Getting rid of the bad guys is the same as defending the woman on the street.
➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/77806-understanding-autonomy
It's obvious why the bad guys are evil in the same way it's obvious why the man assaulting the woman is evil.
Disclosure will make it obvious.
Disclosure brings the evidence of how evil humans collaborated with evil ETs. How innocent humans were sold by their fellow humans, how children were betrayed by their own parents, and how human rights that human governments acknowledge on the surface were violated on a regular basis.
The good ETs don't have to impose anything. But they would have to fight humans that choose the bad side.
So, if you ask me, the ETs want to avoid having to fight humans at all. What they want instead is this: Bring the truth, and then let humans fight against each other. If the bad humans win, Earth remains a prison planet. If the good humans win... well...
What do we do with the bad people if the good people win?
Put them on another prison planet?
There's still a problem with the "let humans fight against each other" theory.
The bad humans are already aligned with the bad ETs.
The good humans would align with the good ETs, but the good ETs refuse to align with the good humans, because they only want to align with all of humanity at once.
It doesn't make sense.
Why are the good ETs not willing to align with the good humans only?
Why is it all or nothing?