My first impulse is to say I want more time. I want a longer life span and the opportunity to learn more.

Then, I also think I want to learn about how other civilizations have managed longer life spans. If the tech is there to extend life and memory, surely how others approach having these things is an very old, ancient history. I'd like to learn more about the history of universal civilizations and how they dealt with the psychology and social science of being in a civilization that invented so much.

We use to live longer, in fact before that we didn't die, we were allowed to go to all the different dimensions and move freely within this construct.
We don't need life extension, we need to stop 'entropy'. That is what causes aging...in other words, they suck on our life force, which causes entropy.

Sometimes constraints are good I think. If I had too much freedom, I'm not sure I'd make good choices. If I could do anything and go anywhere, my soul could wander wildly across the universe. If everyone else could do the same, would anyone ever connect again? There's something to be said for self-restraint. I'd like an intermediate stage of freedom before taking the training wheels off.

@Just Another Isby
You think that because you forgot you were free before you came into this construct. What's wrong with going all over and adventuring off to where ever? You can't lose your connect to source, it's within you in your heart center. It's like a black hole. For lack of better expanation.
You think freedom you'd do something that would be overkill or not sure what you 'fear' you'd do if you were truely free, don't think of it in a human type scenario. Just remember when you were free before you came here.

If everyone was free originally, something apparently went wrong because people made some bad choices. Some people used their freedom for nefarious ends so I think we should be careful to think what freedom means. Freedom is a good idea but there's a history about how it can be misused.

You can't be free if you have limits. That isn't how freedom works. You act like if we all were freed from this construct that we'd lose our minds from all that freedom and go crazy.
The thing about freedom is that you must be sovereign, to be sovereign means there is no one above or below you. When you accept the 'responsibility' for sovereignty (freedom), you know that everything you do affects others, we are the ones responsible for our own actions. I'm not going to go crazy with freedom, it's a natural state for ISBEs, it's not natural to be memory wiped and told you are some sinful lowly creature and have no control over your condition.
FREEDOM to choose, freedom to create but with that comes great responsibility....I don't need to be throttled by some construct to not go crazy with my freedom.

I don't know how you come to this interpretation to answer to my post with what you wrote about freedom and how I imply that freedom makes somebody crazy. I wrote nothing about freedom at all.
I can now write something about it if you like: 1 the title "nothing in life is free" is absolutely stupid. I just need to watch the birds outside to realize that. A smile of a kid, a walk in the forest, feeling the sun on a spring day, a hitch-ride, a self-grown flower from a seed or small twig from the roadside in a pot from the cemetery waste bin -these or alike things in life are very valuable -and they are totally free.
2. "absolute" freedom does not exist, will never exist and would be bad if executed. My freedom ends where your begins. We are limited by physics, biology and society. We need a plane to fly through the air, cannot run 200km per hour and it is actually good that certain folks fear the police, which hinders them to overextend their freedom and steal from the old woman. That is reality -now and it will be in the foreseeable future. Only accepting certain limitations will give you the ability to feel freedom.
Yes it is actually a feeling. And very subjective. One can decide for oneself what it actually means. If you feel limited, then you are not experiencing freedom. If you set yourself a goal and fail -then you feel limited.
FS will not reach its goal to go viral and spread their message when YT subscriber views are limited to less than 10% because the content is not interesting or useful for the YT audience. That will also limit FS freedom of action in the future, because they need the advertising to enable paid subscriptions on vimeo to replace those who cancel.

The word "freedom" is actually one the most instrumentalized words we have. It is used to catch attention and to justify wars and exploitation, as well as lack of responsibility. Consider this as well.

I'm sorry, I was reading another post where someone here seems to believe that we can't be free cuz we'd go nuts and create lots of stuff....and I was responding to them somehow this forum rolled down past your pose and when I looked up your name was there so I thought it was the post I was just reading....Anywho....whom ever stated that we should be allowed to be totally free cuz we might do some crazy things, well, that is the one I'm talking to.
Either way, you don't believe we can be totally free, and are limited anyways. Whatever, this forum is just getting ridiculous, all the fear is gonna bring all that to your front door.
I'm not interested in having a war. So I think I'm just gonna take time away from this forum cuz it's just getting so low frequency and everyone wants to get the good ETs to 'save' us, and simply they have the power to do it themselves. These ETs know it. The good/bad ET thing is the matrix program...the good vs evil.

I'm sorry, I was reading another post where someone here seems to believe that we can't be free cuz we'd go nuts and create lots of stuff....and I was responding to them somehow this forum rolled down past your pose and when I looked up your name was there so I thought it was the post I was just reading....Anywho....whom ever stated that we should be allowed to be totally free cuz we might do some crazy things, well, that is the one I'm talking to.
Either way, you don't believe we can be totally free, and are limited anyways. Whatever, this forum is just getting ridiculous, all the fear is gonna bring all that to your front door.
I'm not interested in having a war. So I think I'm just gonna take time away from this forum cuz it's just getting so low frequency and everyone wants to get the good ETs to 'save' us, and simply they have the power to do it themselves. These ETs know it. The good/bad ET thing is the matrix program...the good vs evil.

No problem I am fine. :)

I think what they're trying to communicate is outside the main stream and also the main alternative streams. It's sort of a complicated and subtle message too: There are good ETs, sort of, but they're more like social workers than cosmic warrior Jedi or other sci fi aliens most people think of. The system is a system to control the mind and opening minds isn't easy because if they were open it wouldn't be a problem.

If opening minds is the goal, I see a backwards trend. Instead of letting the RV data speak for themselves and letting the audience take their own conclusions, the focus is now on a top-down educational approach to promote a certain point of view. -Similar like in school. The last spotlight (from my perspective) is an attempt to subtly justify the decision of reduced free RV content on YT. (Humanity has to do something to change/educate itself -pay for the 'gET-enabled FS historical' knowledge)
That misses the fact that the free content enabled the vimeo branch and income in the first place by gathering the attention of potential paying followers. This attention of the masses is in fact not free. One has to give something valuable, interesting, entertaining or useful for this attention of the YT audience. One is in competition for the YT user's watch-/lifetime with other channels. The audience also gives its time, focus and attention for this "free" content. And satisfied followers do free word-of-mouth propaganda by sharing and spreading the offer for interesting or useful stuff to their friends, family and via social media, forums, comments, etc. This marketing is very valuable, too. This kind of marketing is, by the way, seen by all experts as the most desirable marketing a business can have. -A lot more powerful than expensive paid ads. So FS do actually get something very valuable 'in return' -nearly for free. The most attractive/informative creators get huge amounts in donations, often without even asking for it. They give something 'for free' and get something back 'for free'. They can also do product placements and are able to run premium content, because the free content draws so much attention, the law of big numbers enables the fulfillment of other goals (spreading the message, education, financial abilities, etc. for Farsight).
So 'free content' is actually a free WIN-WIN -if it is useful or attractive in another way for many.
The ET stuff is interesting and useful if the predictions are reliable and verifiable in the real world (we can see that in the strong raise of the numbers which strongly declined with the 'bigger ships' and AI-focused content). But I guess scientific RV and useful (free YT and later/more on vimeo) market and world event predictions have a wider/bigger potential audience to address. RV is constantly moving towards the direction of becoming mainstream knowledge. -FS had a major role in spreading the word. But others will take over the attention in this area if the trend of declining views on YT does continue. 'Free content' is key. One can see that very clearly at FFG's channel. They lost a lot of attention and got many bad comments by clickbait and redaction of content till the point of complete uselessness and frustration of the clickers. The numbers came back instantly when they started to deliver more insightful/usable RV content.

The American role in arming of the Soviets and domestic pro communist propaganda during the Roosevelt era (you will not believe until you have seen the historic material: it switched from anti-war involvement to pro-Soviet and later -shortly before the end- to anti-communist) to enable that and also direct war entry (which became the basis for the empire we see today):

Here is the first part about Stalin...

Yes, position one is clearly the Crowley -"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law" - and "everybody has the right to kill those who are opposing/hindering this right" agenda, also often adapted by satanists.

I would like to add further perspectives:
Freedom is the ability to take free decisions about the allocation of the individually available resources. (socioeconomic perspective, even the foundation of the theories: basic assumption!)
Democratic freedom: The ability to vote based on freely educated political will-formation.
Both are incorrect/fundamentally faulty due to the reality of microeconomics (manipulative advertising, desire production/neuro-marketing) and propaganda/forced education and media framing.