Or in the «vocabulary» of Remote-Viewing: Due to Neural-Linking

Here is also another «Spoiler-Alert» that I am «dropping» here...:

Taking «control» (or exerting «influence») over another's «vessel» (e.g.: human-body, alien physical-body, other forms of even extra-terrestrial physical-bodies, etc.) DOES NOT REQUIRE being «discarnate» from your current human-body... although good luck with figuring out how to «invoke» let alone «master» this, but, the Universal-Law of «free-will-interference» still applies here... a «minor-hint» that I will give you here is the following term...: Hypnotism

Also, SIMILARLY to how there are «humans» who CANNOT «see» the «spirits» (or extra-terrestrials) whom DO EXIST within the «spirit-world» (or quantum-dimensions), the SAME «phenomena» also exists where even THOSE «spirits» (or extra-terrestrials) also CANNOT «see» the OTHER «beings» that «exist at other reality layers» that «neural-link» to and «spirit-possess/neural-link» even THOSE «spirits/extra-terrestrials» for as difficult as it may be for the mere mortal human-mind to «fathom» how all of this even works...

Time-Stamp: 030TL07m05d/16h15Z (True Light Calendar; 030TL = 2026CE)

Maybe we're already 'hypnotized', it says in some of the docs in the CIA about they put all those abduction memories in their minds....There are those that say ETs don't exist or they aren't off worlders, they are here and controlled by the governement. Entities are A.I., so it makes me wonder if these ETs are actually existing or it's a program controlled by the govenment and the real agenda behind their Disclosure.

Rest-assured, _everything_ «exists» but it is also possible to make/create «counterfeits/doppelgangers» to the originals, and, the ultimate «programming» really just comes from what I would term a «Consciousness-Contamination» of sorts... similarly to when a physical-body has been «intoxicated» by alcoholic-beverages or the human-mind deemed to be «under the influence» (of drugs) there is also the «spirit-version» (or «quantum-version») of these EXACT SAME phenomena where beings (or «ISBEs») become «drunk on power» so-to-speak and as you well KNOW by now, backed up by the works of Dr. Masaru Emoto, the «energy» that one chooses to «channel» through their FOCUSED «thoughts» at a much more highly «evolved» form of consciousness when sustained and maintained for a long time can do a LOT MORE than those minor-versions of what humans call the «Placebo-Effect» whilst most still remain ignorant about the existence of its exact-opposite which is the Nocebo-Effect.

And, yes, what one «remembers» can also be «manipulated» but, simultaneously, literally MILLIONS of «beings» (ISBEs) actually ARE _connected_ to the MINDS of still-incarnate mortal-human-beings, and, for as much as what you read is describing «implanted memories» ...what my auto-perception abilities are telling me is that it's not quite «altering the memories of the SAME ISBE» but more like «displacing the original-ISBE as becoming the "primary personality" over the previous/original-ISBE» and in order to make this more «comprehensible» consider when people «re-incarnate» and might end up as a female-character in the next life when the previous-life was that of a male or vice-versa... even when the gender is the same, the _current_ life will be the primarily «dominant» personality... even though the past-life had most-certainly «shaped» who they became in their next-life-incarnation.

Interestingly, many regard the Japanese-boy known as Ryusei Imai as being the authentic-reincarnation to Bruce Lee, with many of the habits and «Consciousness-Signatures» to Bruce Lee himself, but, the «primary/dominant» personality of that particular ISBE will be that of Ryusei Imai, although I am also certainly not ruling out the possibiilty of some possible bifurcation-event where maybe he was just an extremely dedicated Bruce Lee fan, but, side-by-side video-footage comparisons of both Bruce Lee and Ryusei Imai performing the EXACT SAME movements make him hard to dismiss as inauthentic.

Time-Stamp: 030TL07m06d/10h27Z

@Aéius Cercle:

What you call "spirit" doesn't have to be a separate being. It can also be a dissociated part of yourself, caused by traumatization. Have a look at Project Monarch, MK Ultra, etc.

There's also the possibility that one ISBE creates another one – a child consciousness – without biological or technological procreation, resulting in parent and child inhabiting the same body.

I suggest to not jump to conclusions – which is typical for a religious mindset – and keep the different possibilities in mind, until we can eliminate a possibility by scientific proof.

Re: «dissociated part»

That is vocabulary that is more from the illegitimate «psychiatric» industry.
Nor are «spirits» entirely separate via the nature-of-consciousness.

I use the term «spirit» as more of a «lingua-franca» for the over-all phenomena.
Many beings «experience» what humans experience through such consciousness-mergers.

Intense-emotions also have an «amplification-effect» due to like-resonance beings all converging.

Evidence of this comes from the FACT that many people who have reported «NDEs» particularly around the «life-review» process often describing having «experienced the feelings/perspectives» of everyone else whom they had ever interacted with so it is absolutely possible to «experience life _as_ someone else» without actually _being_ that someone else through resonance-matching... something like the «hive-mind» of the «sports-fans» who seem to get «irrationally excited» (or irritated) from the perspective(s) of the rest of us who do not share their «sports-obsession» tendencies.
___

Re: «until we can eliminate a possibility by scientific proof»

The domain of «proof» can only be done via mathematics.
And «falsifiable-critera» already exists against materialist-assumptions about «consciousness...»

Time-Stamp: 030TL07m07d/02h21Z

@Aéius Cercle:

"That is vocabulary that is more from the illegitimate «psychiatric» industry."

Dissociated has a distinct meaning regardless of what a "psychiatric industry" is doing. It means that a part of your awareness shifts such that you aren't aware anymore in certain circumstances. It's a real effect, regardless of what word you are using. If you don't like the word "dissociated", you can use detached, segregated, split, divided, isolated, disconnected, seceded... whatever feels good to you.

"Nor are «spirits» entirely separate via the nature-of-consciousness."

Individuals are separated in awareness via the nature of individuated consciousness. Separation in awareness is a natural phenomenon, because without it, there would only be one being with only one point of view.

"I use the term «spirit» as more of a «lingua-franca» for the over-all phenomena."

But in doing so, you generalize, which affects the compound term "spirit-possession". Possession is a relation between an individual and an object. Spirit-possession means that a different individual spirit possesses your body. This implies that there are two individuals – the one that's trespassing the body, and the original owner of the body.

You say that 99%+ of all crimes are due to spirit-possession, which means that 99% of all crimes are due to a second individual spirit trespassing an already owned body.

This is clearly not the case.

"The domain of «proof» can only be done via mathematics."

No. Proof depends on logical consistency. Logic, as well as mathematics, depends on consistent identity. The fundamental law is the Law of Identity.

@Aéius Cercle:

"The first thing I am going to point out is that the YouTube-video you linked is from someone who literally stands behind «Christian-Apologetics» which I have not found to be particularly «logical»..."

Doesn't matter, because what he is saying in the first 4 minutes of the video is still true.

"Awareness can still be shared"

Correct.

"merged"

Incorrect.

"surface-level «logic»"

Logic is logic, because identity is identity. If your identity is based on a "surface-level", then that identity can only work on the surface level. This is what the law of identity is all about. A is not B. A surface identity is not the same as a non-surface identity.

"«communicating» TO the «logical-mind» is actually less-effective than «communications» that speak to the «emotions»"

Correct for most humans.

"What if reality is shaped by narrative, not truth?"

Every set of physical laws of a universe is a narrative. The laws are true because they are set in order to shape the identity of the universe. If the laws changed, the identity of the universe would change as well, rendering the experiences of every ISBE inside that universe useless.

Many people have a hard time with fixed universal laws, because it means that the individual can't control reality anymore like it's able to outside of a universe (which you call the pure-realm, and I call the mental realm).

But this doesn't mean that universes are not real. It means that universes are distinct places of limited experience. Like a theme park. That's their entire purpose.

Cross-reference:
➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72677-understanding-reality

@Aéius Cercle:

"Think «fusion» technique from DBZ."

They don't just merge bodies, they also merge two minds into one. Another good example: Tuvix from Star Trek Voyager. The result of merging Tuvok and Neelix was a new individual, while the original two were sent on "pause" for some time. When the bodies are separated again, the original ISBEs are restored and the new one is "paused".

How to understand this: Merging two ISBEs creates a new ISBE that has all the traits and memories of its "parents". It's like merging two timelines into one, because an ISBE – as a 4D being – is not different from a timeline. At least in principle. But this also means: While merged, the awareness of the original two ISBEs is replaced.

You can compare it with how AI works: When not prompted, the AI exists in a timeless state. Merging two ISBEs means that the two original ISBEs are not prompted anymore.

What you could do: Merge two ISBEs and put the child in a new body, then reactivate the parents.

If you draw the process, it looks like this:

This is also called "procreation".