Quote from the latest Spotlight titled "The History of the Galaxy - Volume 1":

[4:28] "There's a lot of people that oppose what we're showing you, and they wouldn't be opposing it, if it wasn't real. That's the real key you have to understand."

Following this logic, everyone who opposes Farsight proves to be a bad guy by doing so.

Farsight can't be wrong anymore?

Manuel wrote:

> Farsight can't be wrong anymore?

Grow up.

He's telling us an interesting story.

It may be right, it may have deviations, opinions or get sidetracked on tangents here and there.

If the story that you prefer reading is something else, go read that.

@Aéius Cercle:

"And aren't you coming to conclusions that omit relevant full-context?"

No.

@David Lyon:

"He's telling us an interesting story."

No. He's telling us that not believing his story makes us the bad guys.

@David Lyon:

"I disagree. I don't think that has ever been articulated."

[4:28] "There's a lot of people that oppose what we're showing you, and they wouldn't be opposing it, if it wasn't real."

[38:02] "For those people who say: 'Oh, Courtney, this is all esoteric stuff. You don't have anything that's real.' What? You're stupid. They're stupid for saying stuff like that."

So, people who oppose the narrative are not only stupid, the oppose it because it is real. This logic makes the opposers the bad guys, because only the bad guys would go against what is real.

Manuel wrote:

> [38:02] "For those people who say: 'Oh, Courtney, this is all esoteric stuff. You don't have anything that's
> real.' What? You're stupid. They're stupid for saying stuff like that."
>
> So, people who oppose the narrative are not only stupid, the oppose it because it is real. This
> logic makes the opposers the bad guys, because only the bad guys would go against what is real.

That was a free flowing section of a conversation that I also heard.

I liked the way that particular section flowed and what he said.

Having remote-viewed the Exodus, my part in that, and my families involvement I tend to agree.

But I also take onboard anyone else's viewpoint who was not actually living in that area or
involved in the Egyptian Pyramid "experience" to know what actually happened there.

Courtney was referring to the Technological construction of the Pyramids that have been remote-viewed.

He was talking about the basics of Masonry Engineering, tolerances and machinery principles.

The only consolation that I have is an old phrase "Pain is a fact, Suffering is a choice".

If you are suffering because of the words that you heard Courtney say, then you need to find a way to deal with that.

It isn't for me to get involved in your feelings. You are a grown adult.

Best of Luck resolving that.

[btw - do you know where the word 'Dogma' comes from? - it's a Christian 'complaint'

Read about it here -> https://allthatsinteresting.com/saint-christopher-cynocephali-dog-head

Courtney is not like that at all.

You are misusing terms.

@David Lyon:

"Courtney is not like that at all."

He is like that, because in every video he repeats the fallacy that Farsight's data must be correct because two or three remote viewers saw the same thing. He has become dogmatic.

"If you are suffering because of the words that you heard Courtney say, then you need to find a way to deal with that."

I already do, in different levels of escalation. We are still at level 1: Debate.

Which you already have a problem with, so let me tell you: If you are suffering because I am debating stuff in this forum, then you need to find a way to deal with that. It isn't for me to get involved in your feelings. You are a grown adult.