Quote from @Aéius Cercle:
"A materialist has a DOUBLE-STANDARD of Evidence."
No.
A materialist has a matter-based standard of evidence. If you want to convince a materialist, you have to manipulate matter in a way that affects the physical senses. This has nothing to do with a double standard. It's more like ignoring the non-physical side of reality, like intuition and perception without physical senses.
So, what do you consider to be evidence?
In other words: What has to happen such that whatever it is becomes "evident" to you?
For me, evidence is what forces a model to explain something it could not simply generate from its own assumptions 🔥
Pain does not meet that standard. Pain proves that a system is producing pain. It does not tell you what caused it, who caused it, whether your interpretation is correct, or what larger architecture produced it.
For Prison Planet research, the strongest evidence is convergence between independent anomalies.
Remote Viewing shows information access beyond ordinary sensory channels.
Out of body experience shows that conscious perception is not cleanly reducible to normal bodily localisation.
Near death reports repeatedly contain separation from the body, altered access and transition structures.
Reincarnation cases point toward continuity across biological lives.
Memory suppression is exactly what the incarnation system would require if continuity exists but is meant to remain inaccessible.
And natal astrology adds something even stranger: the incarnated personality arrives with an extremely specific operating architecture already mapped at birth. Cognition, restriction, fog, identity, action, emotional vulnerability and unusual information access are not distributed randomly.
None of those observations alone proves the entire Prison Planet model.
What matters is that they begin to fit one architecture unusually well:
persistent consciousness
restricted embodiment
memory suppression
imposed personality profile
limited leakage through the interface
death transition
reincarnation routing
That is evidence because one architecture explains several otherwise disconnected anomalies at once.
The next level is prediction.
If the model lets you predict something specific before you know the answer, and it keeps working across independent cases, the evidential weight rises dramatically.
That is much stronger than pain, belief, intuition or an impressive experience.
Pain can wake someone up.
It cannot tell them what they woke up inside ✨ 🔥