Okay, let's have a closer look at this idea...

My first reaction was:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71740-telling-the-truth-is-not-a-psy-op

Because, in my world of thinking, telling the truth is not an "operation" you have to carefully think through and plan and prepare. In other words: You don't have to manipulate people into truth, as truth is self-evident. You just tell it.

But I thought about this, because of the egg uap and how people react to it. It's just an egg, there is no ground crew and this and that, and even my grandma can fake it. Everybody was waiting for the big revelation, and then it's just a boring egg... WTF?

But what if that's not the purpose at all? If you pay attention what's happening right now, you see that more and more people are talking about ETs and secret technology. There are more videos and photos of strange eggs coming out, as if people were sitting on footage for years and kept it secret because it's not good enough. It's like, one had to do the first step, and now others find the courage to go public as well. It's the same with the "drones": More and more people are willing to share their experiences, even if they happened years or decades ago.

I was very frustrated with the disclosure process so far, because, I am aware of certain things for so long now, I just have no patience anymore. They claim to be technologically advanced and dominating the solar system and all that, so why not just end human slavery first and tell us afterwards?

But maybe there is something to it that the "rambo way" of freeing the planet won't work. The transition would be too harsh. We have to consider the psychological effects, and we have to counter negative reactions in a peaceful way. In other words: You can't force a being to be free, because being free means assuming responsibility, and this needs to be learned (just like with children).

So, what if the strategy is to accustom the population to a certain way of thinking? Don't present the evidence on a silver plate, but make them discover it all by themselves. Like with the egg uap – people think it's fake and underwhelming, but they still want to know the truth, so they keep digging. And the ones who are just consuming the information are getting used to it over time. This is why it's taking so long.

I must admit, I wanted the ETs to be our saviors. As I said, I have no patience anymore. This planet is so primitive. You know what I mean when you have to deal with returning memories. You feel the loss, and it hits you hard.

I'm still very skeptical, because I hate religions and mind control. But because of this, I started the process of creating an association of people who want to look at the results of remote viewing scientifically. Not the process of remote viewing, because the science is already there. I mean to look at the evidence wether it's correct what remote viewers see. Verification. We should start to collect real world evidence. Not just some pictures of uaps. We need to think big. Don't take remote viewing as gospel, but question everything, and go after it. That's the only way to get to the truth.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72163-the-next-step

And maybe that's what the so called good ETs wanted to achieve in the first place? That we take it in our own hands because what they do is not enough? Maybe that's the "psy-op". I don't know.

Here's another example:

TikTok, after being banned for a few days, seems to be different after it returned. But the difference is presented in a way that people get more aware of what's wrong, not less.

Is this a psy-op to make people aware of what already has been the case for years? To make them see?

Not everybody is going to follow nor agree with your nor anybody else's «ideology» and in fact, I had people «follow» me in the past, who apparently WANTED for ME to «lead» them, basically, telling them what to do and when to do it which I didn't really have the schedule for. When I attempted to get them to try «thinking» more «independently» they literally got MAD that I tried to get them to be more of a «free-thinker» and «question authority» RATHER THAN wanting ME to give THEM «military style ORDERS» for them to «follow» on a STRICT «disciplined» regimen.

A past Aikido-Instructor also told me that the reason that her students go to her is because she is actually very STRICT with her «Discipline» that she expects upon them and they actually PREFER to have such a «structured» life & life-style & discipline... believe it or not, people DO exist who want to be told what to do and let OTHERS do the «thinking» for them, because, you know (unless you do not), activities like... thinking... just takes and requires things like... like... gasp... work, and, and, and, also... gasp... effort...! [this is where we now insert some sort of terrified face-emoji here...]

"Resurrecting the Mysterious"
A Biomind Super Powers Book -Ingo Swann (Edited by Nick Cook)

Keeping the masses stable or relatively stable, and thereby the entirety of the whole pyramid, thus becomes the chief concern of the top echelons of the hierarchy.

Many measures to attain this stability have been experimented with thru the ages, the most basic one being force and slavery. p95

Thus, belief-management has always been a top priority for those occupying the top positions in a hierarchy.

In the ideal-sense, belief-management should concern itself only with certain realities needed to keep the pyramid sane and rational; and provide it with a dependable real future.

A good part of this involves accurate recognition of the limits - of what is known
and shared as knowledge, and - what is not known but should be found.

Unfortunately, this ideal-sense - usually comes into conflict with the realities
those at the top of the hierarchy are using to keep the masses stable.

It is then usually only one brief step from
belief-management to
belief-manipulation and
belief-modification with all the conspiracies these latter two demons imply. p98

"Did you notice that when I pushed him too hard before he "gave up" and said I win just because he's not getting paid to be on here 24/7."

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71326-understanding-the-game

I said you won the game to make a point. You now prove you didn't get what that point was, so let me explain: You won the "you can't convince me" game, and in doing so, proved that you are a person one cannot talk to rationally.

You won that game. Congratulations. 👏🏻

So, let's have a deeper look at your "Signs of a Government Shill":

1) "Avoidance..."

I'm discussing issues head-on and provide constructive input. My input is based in logical thinking, which is necessary for a rational discussion or debate in order to call attention to contradictions and logical fallacies. I also use the socratic method to ask questions, and in doing so, imply things. The reason is to teach people how to think, not what to think.

2) "Selectivity..."

The way how I choose "opponents" is merely based on wether and how they apply logic, as my intent is to make logical inconsistencies and fallacies visible and talk about them. The reason why you are my main focus at this point is because you provide the most logical inconsistencies, as the religion you promote is logically inconsistent.

3) "Coincidental..."

I choose my topics not by coincidence, but it may look like it to people who don't understand why I'm talking about what I'm talking about. Also, I'm a human being with a real life. I'm not here 24/7 like you, so it may happen that you have to wait for answers, or that threads vanish in the depths of the forum over time. This is normal.

4) "Teamwork..."

I have no team. But I'm working on creating an association to look into RV data scientifically:
➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72163-the-next-step

5) "Anti-conspiratorial..."

I have no disdain for conspiracy theorists. There are a lot of conspiracies out there, and I always find them interesting and worthy to have a deeper look into them. As you know, I'm thinking in possibilities and probabilities. Many conspiracy theories are totally possible.

6) "Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance."

That's part of Stoicism, it's called temperance: ➡️ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperance_(virtue)

"Temperance in its modern use is defined as moderation or voluntary self-restraint. It is typically described in terms of what a person voluntarily refrains from doing. This includes restraint from revenge by practicing mercy and forgiveness, restraint from arrogance by practicing humility and modesty, restraint from excesses such as extravagant luxury or splurging, restraint from overindulgence in food and drink, and restraint from rage or craving by practicing calmness and equanimity."

7) "Inconsistent..."

I'm happy to discuss and debate any inconsistencies. That's the main reason why I'm here, doing what I do.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/72277-infiltration-of-consciousness